In post 647, Luca Blight wrote: In post 644, Alisae wrote: In post 642, Luca Blight wrote:318 - Klick was a topic of discussion at that time, so I iso’d him to see exactly where i stood on him. Earlier you called me scummy for being unsure of my Klick read, and now you’re calling me scummy for giving a solid, more confident townread on Klick. That is contradictory BS on your part.
here let me transcribe what your post here essentially is
This post - oh this post is a town post
This post - this post is also town
This post - and so is this one
This post - and this one also
Did anything you say add anything to the game?
No.
And guess what
In that exact same post, you STILL gave yourself room to turn that read into a scumread.
I do believe I added something to the game - the fact that Klick was the one who actually did the test (not Datisi) and that he didn’t try to take credit for it. No-one else had touched upon these points.
What is wrong with saying multiple posts are townie when Iso’ing someone? I said it exactly how I saw it.
waaaaaah
I came up with 1 irrelevant fact!
Waaaaaaaaah
My 1 irrelevant fact (that ANYONE can figure out just by READING THE GAME so its not actually new) is supposed to make up for the fact that I’m not actually doing anything but Ali isn’t buying it
Waaaaaaah
Seriously fuck off with that noise
You can add 1 thing but like, your iso is still shit and you’re still not doing anything
Also whats wrong with it just repeating that someone is town over and over again is that it can look unnatural and like you’re trying to force a read through to look like you’re trying.