Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER

Hopkirk · Post Post #1050 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:38 am

In post 1048, EeveeLution Army wrote:I never said it was alignment indicative?

Why does hearing 'His reasoning for not being here his reasoning for having done nothing.' matter whatsoever then?

Garmr · Post Post #1051 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:40 am

In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?

Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.

EeveeLution Army · Post Post #1052 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:43 am

You missed my point. The sub wouldnt be able to answer those questions. They would only be able to read from a post-post perspective. So asking them anything about roster wouldnt get you anywhere

Hopkirk · Post Post #1053 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:45 am

I didn't think anyone had asked questions of Rooster. Did I miss any?

-Hop

EeveeLution Army · Post Post #1054 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:50 am

Idk if they did. If they didnt than they have even less reason to be on him.

Titus · Post Post #1055 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:54 am

In post 1051, Garmr wrote:
In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?
Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.

Why would my read make you conftown?

Garmr · Post Post #1056 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:58 am

In post 1055, Titus wrote:
In post 1051, Garmr wrote:
In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?
Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.
Why would my read make you conftown?

Because you never read me right in the numerous games we played. Was waiting for you to vote me

Titus · Post Post #1057 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:19 am

In post 1056, Garmr wrote:
In post 1055, Titus wrote:
In post 1051, Garmr wrote:
In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?
Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.
Why would my read make you conftown?
Because you never read me right in the numerous games we played. Was waiting for you to vote me

You're wanting a rash impulse decision from a woman who is putting her life back together. Not going to happen.

Garmr · Post Post #1058 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:21 am

In post 1057, Titus wrote:
In post 1056, Garmr wrote:
In post 1055, Titus wrote:
In post 1051, Garmr wrote:
In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?
Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.
Why would my read make you conftown?
Because you never read me right in the numerous games we played. Was waiting for you to vote me
You're wanting a rash impulse decision from
a woman who is putting her life back together
. Not going to happen.

Did something bad happen, are you ok?

Hopkirk · Post Post #1059 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:26 am

In post 1054, EeveeLution Army wrote:Idk if they did. If they didnt than they have even less reason to be on him.

I kind of got the impression on him people were on him for the sake of having a wagon, with some people being happy about it being a wagon on an inactive. Did you think differently to this.

VOTE: Elements

Titus · Post Post #1060 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:40 am

In post 1058, Garmr wrote:
In post 1057, Titus wrote:
In post 1056, Garmr wrote:
In post 1055, Titus wrote:
In post 1051, Garmr wrote:
In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?
Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.
Why would my read make you conftown?
Because you never read me right in the numerous games we played. Was waiting for you to vote me
You're wanting a rash impulse decision from
a woman who is putting her life back together
. Not going to happen.
Did something bad happen, are you ok?

Yeah and I will be. Mafia's a good distraction.

Cliff Booth · Post Post #1061 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:45 am

In post 1033, Carcalilly wrote:
In post 1009, YOUAREGREAT wrote:<snip>
i usually try to play mafia by sorting every player at once, but this game is too big for my usual playstyle to work here. i'm just gonna try to play ~in the moment~, so to speak.
ngl this is hella awkward

idk I feel that post tbh

Cliff Booth · Post Post #1062 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:52 am

A few votes have been made on others with reasoning that could easily also be applied to me. That makes me think that maybe people think I'm something that I'm not?

I can dig it.

Elements · Post Post #1063 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:59 am

In post 1032, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 984, Elements wrote:VOTE: elements
Look! a wagon is beginning to form! and it's on an active player! Quick join it so it has some significance!
Oh, you know we're going to be voting you soon so you vote yourself in a silly looking way to paint anyone who does the same thing as an idiot eh? Well I'm on to your little game.

What are you on about here

davesaz · Post Post #1064 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:12 am

In post 1051, Garmr wrote:
In post 1017, Titus wrote:
VC please

Garmr, you know I don't read on subbing in?
Yeah but I want to be confirmed town.

This type of comment bugs me whenever I see it.
Just be town, if you're town. Being "confirmed" is something to be wary of when you're town because scum are the only ones who

know

you're town.

davesaz · Post Post #1065 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:18 am

In post 1062, Cliff Booth wrote:A few votes have been made on others with reasoning that could easily also be applied to me. That makes me think that maybe people think I'm something that I'm not?

Ooh, let me guess. People think you're town but you're not?
VOTE: Cliff Booth

BTW that's not just a joke vote. I happen to agree that the reasoning [not scumhunting] applies to you. Prove me wrong.

davesaz · Post Post #1066 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:19 am

Separate topic (slightly related).
Someone made a comment that having opinions is scumhunting. It's not. Taking actions to become informed is what I'm looking for.

Hopkirk · Post Post #1067 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:19 am

In post 1062, Cliff Booth wrote:A few votes have been made on others with reasoning that could easily also be applied to me. That makes me think that maybe people think I'm something that I'm not?

I can dig it.

It took me until earlier today to realize you have no content. Most people don't seem to have realized.
Was it you or Rick who didn't like me?

In post 1063, Elements wrote:
In post 1032, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 984, Elements wrote:VOTE: elements
Look! a wagon is beginning to form! and it's on an active player! Quick join it so it has some significance!
Oh, you know we're going to be voting you soon so you vote yourself in a silly looking way to paint anyone who does the same thing as an idiot eh? Well I'm on to your little game.
What are you on about here

Nothing actually scum indicative/important.
Rephrased- Acting dumb while performing x action links performing x action with acting dumb, so makes people more reluctant to perform x actions as they'll think it makes them look dumb.
I do not think this is what you were going for, and have no evidence it applies in mafia games.

-Hop

Cliff Booth · Post Post #1068 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:20 am

I'm down to lynch elements or hopkirk so far. My gut tells me I want to lynch Gamma but that's why I don't want to lynch gamma. I could compromise on kop

Hopkirk · Post Post #1069 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:20 am

In post 1065, davesaz wrote:
In post 1062, Cliff Booth wrote:A few votes have been made on others with reasoning that could easily also be applied to me. That makes me think that maybe people think I'm something that I'm not?
Ooh, let me guess. People think you're town but you're not?
VOTE: Cliff Booth

Did you read my other post before this?

This is a terrible justification of wagoning Roster but would be a good justification for a Cliff wagon... @Dave too
BTW that's not just a joke vote. I happen to agree that the reasoning [not scumhunting] applies to you. Prove me wrong.

In post 1066, davesaz wrote:Separate topic (slightly related).
Someone made a comment that having opinions is scumhunting. It's not. Taking actions to become informed is what I'm looking for.

If you can find this person they're worth a wagon.

-Kirk

Cliff Booth · Post Post #1070 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:21 am

In post 1067, Hopkirk wrote:Rick who didn't like me?

Both, but I was the first to voice my opinion.

Hopkirk · Post Post #1071 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:22 am

In post 1068, Cliff Booth wrote:I'm down to lynch elements or hopkirk so far. My gut tells me I want to lynch Gamma but that's why I don't want to lynch gamma. I could compromise on kop

Let me guess, you plan to keep saying you dislike me, refusing to say why despite being asked multiple times, and then complain nobody is doing the wagon you want/you didn't want the lynch we got?

VOTE: Cliff

Cliff Booth · Post Post #1072 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:23 am

In post 1065, davesaz wrote:
In post 1062, Cliff Booth wrote:A few votes have been made on others with reasoning that could easily also be applied to me. That makes me think that maybe people think I'm something that I'm not?
Ooh, let me guess. People think you're town but you're not?
VOTE: Cliff Booth

BTW that's not just a joke vote. I happen to agree that the reasoning [not scumhunting] applies to you. Prove me wrong.

I'm not ready to scumhunt yet. But it was really easy to bait you into voting me. I'm gonna enjoy the feeling for awhile.

Btw your votes look really weird in a vacuum

Cliff Booth · Post Post #1073 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:24 am

In post 1071, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 1068, Cliff Booth wrote:I'm down to lynch elements or hopkirk so far. My gut tells me I want to lynch Gamma but that's why I don't want to lynch gamma. I could compromise on kop
Let me guess, you plan to keep saying you dislike me, refusing to say why despite being asked multiple times, and then complain nobody is doing the wagon you want/you didn't want the lynch we got?

VOTE: Cliff

I'm pretty sure you're the only person who knows why I voted for you. And if not that really hurts my feelings.

Hopkirk · Post Post #1074 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:25 am

To clarify, Rick is Flavor leaf and I don't know who you are. Is this right?