As a scumgame? Uh,In post 899, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Also I am required to be as vague as possible on this given that you linked a still-ongoing game.
It does not matter if you are dead.
It does not matter if you don't think it will affect a game.
It does not matter if you aren't in the game.
It does not matter if you are posting about a game taking place on another forum or posting about an MS game on another forum.
I stand corrected and shouldn't have linked it in the first place, then. Sorry.In post 901, popsofctown wrote:It does not matter if you are dead.
It does not matter if you don't think it will affect a game.
It does not matter if you aren't in the game.
It does not matter if you are posting about a game taking place on another forum or posting about an MS game on another forum.
I trust that you have more of a case than a apparent tonal tell that you can't talk about?In post 902, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I did read other (finished) games of yours and the specific tell that I was referring to earlier in this thread was from -not the MU game that you linked-.
However it is also present in that game so I feel a lot safer simply citing 'reasons' as I have been doing to date.
Forgive me if this does not inspire confidence in your play, especially when you can't demonstrate that you've read the scum game I linked you.In post 906, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Eh I just don't want to address my read on you anymore because there's so many ways to get in trouble doing so.
I think that Eventide is scum and I have very good reasons to think that.
Because there's nothing to productively engage; I was voting them for a bad reason and didn't know there was an existing wagon. Seemed like a good idea at the time, wasn't.In post 910, Tana and Ephraim wrote:At any rate, I mentioned that your Sailor vote felt opportunistic, how come you never engaged me on that?
-Tana
The scum game I linked you is not ongoing! You ought to be able to summarize the facts of my play in it at least!In post 909, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Why is it so hard to follow something as simple of "ongoing games dont exist" rule
-Tana
That would be nice, but im not good at meta reading, im more of a "in the momment" player. Dunno if it's ongoing or not, that's what RC said, he's the one that meta dives.In post 912, Lady Eventide wrote:The scum game I linked you is not ongoing! You ought to be able to summarize the facts of my play in it at least!In post 909, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Why is it so hard to follow something as simple of "ongoing games dont exist" rule
-Tana
I was obviously addressing Ephiraim there. Don't swap heads on me just to make my arguments seem unreasonable.In post 914, Tana and Ephraim wrote:That would be nice, but im not good at meta reading, im more of a "in the momment" player. Dunno if it's ongoing or not, that's what RC said, he's the one that meta dives.In post 912, Lady Eventide wrote:The scum game I linked you is not ongoing! You ought to be able to summarize the facts of my play in it at least!In post 909, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Why is it so hard to follow something as simple of "ongoing games dont exist" rule
-Tana
-Tana
I'm obviously signing my posts so dont quote the post from the wrong head if you were intending to talk to the other oneIn post 915, Lady Eventide wrote:I was obviously addressing Ephiraim there. Don't swap heads on me just to make my arguments seem unreasonable.
... If this is the actual rule I'm leaving this community. Because that's dumb as hell. You're literally saying that any form of meta discussion is off limits because it might affect how I'm read in some other game.In post 913, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Anything I said about what is present in your scum play would be tantamount to saying that it's not present in the same amount in your town play and thus would constitute discussing the town game to a level that I'm not comfortable with.
I guess you havent been reading our posts. I've mentioned several times that my role here is to make our hydra more readable coz RC is usually paranoia scumread, he's the better scumhunter and i generally dont question his reads unless i have a strong townread on the player he scumreads.In post 919, Lady Eventide wrote:@Tana: It surprises me that you don't lead with it and instead go with Ephiraim's toneread. What else are the "various" reasons that you two have mentioned, or does your hydra also contain "various people"?
Because if you are lying about having read the game, you are faking analysis. Which is the biggest red flag I know of in Mafia.In post 920, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Here'smyquestion. Why is your emphasis on me proving that I've read the game, if you scumread me? If I'm scum, I can read the game and provide facts.
OTOH if you feel like you've done a fantastic job of not playing to your scum meta and think that you'reso goodat scum, you might believe that I haven't read that game yet and that my read on you might change if I did.
You're failing to make him more legible, then.In post 921, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I guess you havent been reading our posts. I've mentioned several times that my role here is to make our hydra more readable coz RC is usually paranoia scumread, he's the better scumhunter and i generally dont question his reads unless i have a strong townread on the player he scumreads.In post 919, Lady Eventide wrote:@Tana: It surprises me that you don't lead with it and instead go with Ephiraim's toneread. What else are the "various" reasons that you two have mentioned, or does your hydra also contain "various people"?
-Tana