good reckoner impression.In post 640, Papa Zito wrote:Friendly reminder that meta is trash
do UT next pls
good reckoner impression.In post 640, Papa Zito wrote:Friendly reminder that meta is trash
and thats my planIn post 621, RCEnigma wrote:That hard townreading me is an easy pocket. It is.
u haven't even seen abusive if u think that was abusive.In post 633, I Will Be Nice wrote:I feel like I may be digging this up again when it's kind of blown over, but I would feel bad if I didn't address this.
I can understand why you may have felt attacked by panthaleon's push, but I think it stepped over the line to attack panthaleon's character and to get abusive like this with people around this time. If you're really frustrated with people's play (and especially so if you think they're town) then it's probably better to just ignore him rather than being mean about it? Especially since you have to know that if this is how he's already reacting to abrasive content, it's probably helping no one/going to make things worse, right?
You're not even voting, get off my back mom.In post 696, Painting Trap wrote:this is a stretch.In post 666, RCEnigma wrote:Seems like an in-joke in a pt somewhereIn post 664, 0verki11 wrote:why doesnt the vault dealer wagon feel valid/real?In post 662, panthaleon wrote:I only asked about Zito because it seemed the realest out of those three ._ .
VOTE: Overkill
chen
He wrongly buddied me with Panth, pushing my (and his) lynch, so I am trying to 1v1 him.In post 693, Karnage wrote:ok, why 0verki11? I skimmed his ISO and nothing is jumping out at me.In post 669, Blatant Scum wrote:VOTE: 0verki11In post 650, Cephrir wrote:Deadline for Day 1: 6 days, 21 hours, 9 minutes.
I ask Painting Trap, Karnage, TheWayItEnds, Cookie Bakers, Josh Wilkinson to vote someone.
I suggest constructing at least one wagon before the day is over.
Why was it casted?In post 697, Painting Trap wrote:i think it was obvious that the first post was a rhetorical question?In post 671, Blatant Scum wrote:In post 441, Blatant Scum wrote:In post 383, Painting Trap wrote:you are aware that you're allowed to say "oops my bad i was so tunneled i didnt notice and i dont really know why i didn't pick up on it" right????What was the point of these two posts?In post 384, Painting Trap wrote:this doesn't really sound like you accepted itIn post 234, panthaleon wrote:So as far I am concerned, bitbringer is promising to make this game as difficult for town as possible. I am content to lynch them on those grounds.
In the meantime I'm kinda into Zito town for his response to bitbringer nonsense, and I would like chemist to elaborate more on his read on me as I believe he's still voting me, even after it being clarified that RC mentioned spamming as scummy before me.
In the first post, it seems to me that you are asking Panthaleon to stop tunneling Bitbringer and start producing content, offering that you won't dig in his past actions (you are talking to him like to potential town).
In the second post, you push Panthaleon back to defending his behaviour, taking TvS (or SvT) stance.
Did I misinterpret these two posts?I feel ignored.In post 634, Blatant Scum wrote:Wanna 1v1 me at least?In post 631, 0verki11 wrote:Didnt feel it was really neededIn post 628, Blatant Scum wrote:You didn't respond on my shade.In post 625, 0verki11 wrote:we are going to pretend I can spell
I feel like that you and Panth are scum for the reasons I already stated
Oh...I didn't see that first time around. Pocket denied.In post 702, bitbringer wrote:u haven't even seen abusive if u think that was abusive.In post 633, I Will Be Nice wrote:I feel like I may be digging this up again when it's kind of blown over, but I would feel bad if I didn't address this.
I can understand why you may have felt attacked by panthaleon's push, but I think it stepped over the line to attack panthaleon's character and to get abusive like this with people around this time. If you're really frustrated with people's play (and especially so if you think they're town) then it's probably better to just ignore him rather than being mean about it? Especially since you have to know that if this is how he's already reacting to abrasive content, it's probably helping no one/going to make things worse, right?
also i don't think ur reading very well because that comment u quoted was at RCE not at panth.
ill get u one day my dearIn post 706, RCEnigma wrote:Oh...I didn't see that first time around. Pocket denied.
I wasn't lurking, I was ignorant Dx Not that you knew that yet but eh. This post is more of an indication of where I am right now.In post 447, Almost50 wrote:one is lurking. *Le Sigh*
I did the thing.In post 709, Shiro wrote:I wasn't lurking, I was ignorant Dx Not that you knew that yet but eh. This post is more of an indication of where I am right now.In post 447, Almost50 wrote:one is lurking. *Le Sigh*
~Shiro
isn't the first time and won't be the last
I... Uh.... Didn't realize vault dweller was a player in this game. So uhhh..In post 696, Painting Trap wrote:this is a stretch.In post 666, RCEnigma wrote:Seems like an in-joke in a pt somewhereIn post 664, 0verki11 wrote:why doesnt the vault dealer wagon feel valid/real?In post 662, panthaleon wrote:I only asked about Zito because it seemed the realest out of those three ._ .
VOTE: Overkill
chen
I didn't even read this game before I /in'd but apparently I am one! Or past me was. Whatever. Let's fix that.In post 716, Blatant Scum wrote:KidAmn, what do you think about selfvoters?
sup bishpisskop wrote:kidadmin!
truth be told I am not too happy with that wagon comp.In post 718, Papa Zito wrote:Bold strategy Cotton etc
The one on Pants?In post 721, pisskop wrote:truth be told I am not too happy with that wagon comp.In post 718, Papa Zito wrote:Bold strategy Cotton etc