Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]


Forum rules
User avatar
Lady 6
Lady 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 506
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:47 pm

Post by Lady 6 »

Spoiler: Lady 4 intro
In post 39, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 35, Lady 9 wrote:
In post 32, Lady 4 wrote:Hello. I wish we had more memorable names.
We could come up with memorable nicknames based on avatars. That might be easier than numbering everyone.
That would help me a lot. Can we do this?
In post 52, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 51, Gentleman 3 wrote:
In post 50, Lady 7 wrote:Me. It hit me wrong.
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.


The first few posts by Lady 4 are unreadable nonsense designed to bog us down in busiwork. She takes an awkward defending angle on Lady 5 too, when most felt the smiles were fake.

Then, we look at the substance of her posts later today.

Spoiler: Recent Lady 4
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
In post 1225, Lady 4 wrote:I'm coming around on L7.

G6 possibly changing his mind is most of the reason I havent accepted my offer.
In post 1200, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 1161, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.
*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.
Scumposting
AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes

Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.
I partly posted that because I thought the attitude might be annoyed at being called out for the wrong reasons, but mostly I posted it to be snarky.


Most of Lady 4's posting is focused on shading players, rather than sorting them. Town look to narrow their focus to find scum. She's taking a buckshot to townreads, particularly unpaired women.

This suggests my pool might not be 100% correct though. Yet G4 and L4 may not be partners. I'm still sorting that.
User avatar
Lady 6
Lady 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 506
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:48 pm

Post by Lady 6 »

In post 1249, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 1120, Lady 6 wrote:Holy forkballs!
I like you just for this.
*jumps into pocket*

I gotta go now.
User avatar
Lady 4
Lady 4
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 4
Goon
Goon
Posts: 405
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:53 pm

Post by Lady 4 »

This is some malarkey.
In post 1250, Lady 6 wrote:
Spoiler: Lady 4 intro
In post 39, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 35, Lady 9 wrote:
In post 32, Lady 4 wrote:Hello. I wish we had more memorable names.
We could come up with memorable nicknames based on avatars. That might be easier than numbering everyone.
That would help me a lot. Can we do this?
In post 52, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 51, Gentleman 3 wrote:
In post 50, Lady 7 wrote:Me. It hit me wrong.
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.


The first few posts by Lady 4 are unreadable nonsense designed to bog us down in busiwork. She takes an awkward defending angle on Lady 5 too, when most felt the smiles were fake.
Asking for nicknames is nonsense? Busywork? These claims are not even supported by the posts you quoted. Also this is ancient history and everyone scumread me early so this isnt exactly revolutionary.

Who cares what "most felt?" Is anyone who goes against the consensus scum now?
Then, we look at the substance of her posts later today.

Spoiler: Recent Lady 4
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
In post 1225, Lady 4 wrote:I'm coming around on L7.

G6 possibly changing his mind is most of the reason I havent accepted my offer.
In post 1200, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 1161, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.
*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.
Scumposting
AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes

Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.
I partly posted that because I thought the attitude might be annoyed at being called out for the wrong reasons, but mostly I posted it to be snarky.


Most of Lady 4's posting is focused on shading players, rather than sorting them. Town look to narrow their focus to find scum. She's taking a buckshot to townreads, particularly unpaired women.

This suggests my pool might not be 100% correct though. Yet G4 and L4 may not be partners. I'm still sorting that.
Why did you even quote these? Two of the three posts you quoted are me expressing relatively favorable reads on ladies and the other is me snarling at you for incorrectly scumreading me. The assertions you're making are not backed up by the posts you e chosen to quote. And you e conveniently skipped the mid game where I got into the swing of things and started town posting. What I'm doing is absolutely sorting. This whole post is unparalleled tripe.
User avatar
Gentleman 5
Gentleman 5
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 5
Goon
Goon
Posts: 873
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:56 pm

Post by Gentleman 5 »

My reasoning:

Assuming all gentlemen are here and dance, they will all be at the dance. That means one lady is out by default.

We have 3 inactive gentlemen so the pairings wont be as strong, that means we should leave the weakest ladies with those gentlemen for now. L1 and L6 arent getting a partner for now; the other two slots are up for debate. I think Im being ignored by G6 but I perfer L7 to have a partner compared to L8, and G3 regardless of your read, is here, and deserves to take a lady who is worth dancing with.

With the exception of L8, who people townread, Im sure no one will object leaving L1/5/6 out at this time.
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Gentleman 3
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Goon
Goon
Posts: 452
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:57 pm

Post by Gentleman 3 »

In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
Honestly I have a pretty hard time seeing her as scum. She just seems laid-back and natural in her interactions like she's just trying to contribute and prod wherever she can, rather than trying to project any sort of appearance. It resonates with me because that's a lot like how I play town.
User avatar
Gentleman 5
Gentleman 5
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 5
Goon
Goon
Posts: 873
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:58 pm

Post by Gentleman 5 »

Im done for tonight. Best of luck to yall.
User avatar
Lady 7
Lady 7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 796
Joined: October 29, 2019
Location: Septem

Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:58 pm

Post by Lady 7 »

In post 1250, Lady 6 wrote:
Spoiler: Lady 4 intro
In post 39, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 35, Lady 9 wrote:
In post 32, Lady 4 wrote:Hello. I wish we had more memorable names.
We could come up with memorable nicknames based on avatars. That might be easier than numbering everyone.
That would help me a lot. Can we do this?
In post 52, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 51, Gentleman 3 wrote:
In post 50, Lady 7 wrote:Me. It hit me wrong.
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.


The first few posts by Lady 4 are unreadable nonsense designed to bog us down in busiwork. She takes an awkward defending angle on Lady 5 too, when most felt the smiles were fake.

Then, we look at the substance of her posts later today.

Spoiler: Recent Lady 4
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
In post 1225, Lady 4 wrote:I'm coming around on L7.

G6 possibly changing his mind is most of the reason I havent accepted my offer.
In post 1200, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 1161, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:
In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.
*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.
Scumposting
AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes

Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.
I partly posted that because I thought the attitude might be annoyed at being called out for the wrong reasons, but mostly I posted it to be snarky.


Most of Lady 4's posting is focused on shading players, rather than sorting them. Town look to narrow their focus to find scum. She's taking a buckshot to townreads, particularly unpaired women.

This suggests my pool might not be 100% correct though. Yet G4 and L4 may not be partners. I'm still sorting that.
HM

HMMM

HMMMMM

Okay those hmmm are probably unnecessary but I've had a couple so I'm feeling a bit silly. Anyway I really don't give a crap about the reactionary accusations I saw, and really I need to actually read through it rather than skimming while doing something else, I mean like half my mafia career was built on being reactionary emotional town, may it rest in peace WE'LL SEE, but this kinda feels like building a narrative. And it's the narrative building that concerns me.
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Gentleman 3
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Goon
Goon
Posts: 452
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:59 pm

Post by Gentleman 3 »

I would rather leave out L2 than L5, I think L5 would be easier to read in the future.
User avatar
Lady 4
Lady 4
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 4
Goon
Goon
Posts: 405
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:03 pm

Post by Lady 4 »

L2 is town and readable, G3. You just don't have eyes or are scum.
User avatar
Lady 7
Lady 7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 796
Joined: October 29, 2019
Location: Septem

Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:07 pm

Post by Lady 7 »

In post 1253, Gentleman 5 wrote:I think Im being ignored by G6
He's ignoring everything so he can guilt trip.
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Gentleman 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 974
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:08 pm

Post by Gentleman 6 »

lol
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Gentleman 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 974
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:08 pm

Post by Gentleman 6 »

lol
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Gentleman 3
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Goon
Goon
Posts: 452
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:11 pm

Post by Gentleman 3 »

In post 1258, Lady 4 wrote:L2 is town and readable, G3. You just don't have eyes or are scum.
No, I took another look at her ISO and I see what you mean now.

Her posts are just hard to follow on mobile, which is how I do a majority of my playing. So I will freely confess to not having read all of them in real-time.

I still think L5 will eventually be readable though.
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Gentleman 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 974
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:14 pm

Post by Gentleman 6 »

L1 and L5 are good removes for opposite spectrum reasons.
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Gentleman 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 974
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:18 pm

Post by Gentleman 6 »

Am I ethically required to pretend that I don't know that having really bad takes isn't a scumtell for L6?
User avatar
Lady 7
Lady 7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 796
Joined: October 29, 2019
Location: Septem

Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:27 pm

Post by Lady 7 »

In post 1264, Gentleman 6 wrote:Am I ethically required to pretend that I don't know that having really bad takes isn't a scumtell for L6?
so you wanna hear something fun? The last alt game I played at my homesite rip every single person decided they knew at least one other person's alt and gave them a meta town read. Some of them were wrong about their alt guess. A couple were wrong about the meta they decided on.

Like i realize you think you know half the people here, you think you know who I am, which if you really knew anything about me you'd not call me out for the crap you have, but even so this is an alt game. I don't know anyone here and due to above I don't trust whatever little things you think you know about someone else. But again even so this is an alt game. Kindly act like it.

(I'm sorry if this is harsh I've had a couple to drink, and I'm a little annoyed that you tried to make me feel guilty.)
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Gentleman 6
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 6
Goon
Goon
Posts: 974
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:29 pm

Post by Gentleman 6 »

I have no idea who you are!
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Gentleman 3
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Goon
Goon
Posts: 452
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:30 pm

Post by Gentleman 3 »

To be fair, I think is perfectly fine, because it isn't a meta townread.
User avatar
Lady 7
Lady 7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 796
Joined: October 29, 2019
Location: Septem

Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:30 pm

Post by Lady 7 »

OH MY GODS

Gentleman five I love our new avvie!
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Gentleman 3
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gentleman 3
Goon
Goon
Posts: 452
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:31 pm

Post by Gentleman 3 »

Lmao.
User avatar
Lady 8
Lady 8
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 8
Goon
Goon
Posts: 479
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:31 pm

Post by Lady 8 »

I'm reading. I'm trying to commit to at least one catchup a day.
In post 1005, Gentleman 6 wrote:Whatever disregard correct play dance with the hottest girl.

Lady 8, will you dance with me?
I accept.
User avatar
Lady 7
Lady 7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 796
Joined: October 29, 2019
Location: Septem

Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:33 pm

Post by Lady 7 »

In post 1266, Gentleman 6 wrote:I have no idea who you are!
Well them um some of my middle fingering of you can be ignored then.
User avatar
Lady 7
Lady 7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 796
Joined: October 29, 2019
Location: Septem

Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:35 pm

Post by Lady 7 »

In post 1268, Lady 7 wrote:OH MY GODS

Gentleman five I love our new avvie!
*your
User avatar
Lady 8
Lady 8
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 8
Goon
Goon
Posts: 479
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:36 pm

Post by Lady 8 »

In post 1022, Lady 7 wrote:Can we please stop with the altguesses? It would really suck if he started force replacing due to it.
Not sure why G5 is being extremely aggro.

Also, I'm not really a big fan of L5 postings.
In post 1050, Lady 5 wrote:
In post 1046, Gentleman 5 wrote:Honestly, theres alot I could say about L5 not accepting the proposal.

I thought she would have accepted that asap since people scumread her and probably have her pinned as a first target.

Im not sure how that makes me feel ie her alignment
Do people still scum read me for emojis? XD or something else?
Is this LAMIST? Also, I'm at like page 45 and wondering why G5 is ignoring all these questions.
User avatar
Lady 8
Lady 8
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Lady 8
Goon
Goon
Posts: 479
Joined: October 29, 2019

Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:37 pm

Post by Lady 8 »

L5* My bad.
Locked