They have
[/color][/b]
In post 250, Thespio wrote:Dunnstral has been prodded
Moonchild has been prodded
They have(expired on 2019-11-18 21:03:26)until they are replaced.
VC on the way
I'm not sure what problem you're having with my post even when you try to paint it in a bad light like this.In post 241, Yimmy wrote:Dunnstral: your post here is sort of worthless. first thing has already been said, second thing is basically just reiterating what was posted, and the third thing just isn't really productive because it doesn't elicit any response.
What are you referring to, by the way?In post 236, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Jocus' whole "tried to shoehorn a case, got caught, tried to cover by saying I meant it this way all along" NONSENSE is just that... nonsense. It's gross. It's laughable. Don't fall for it.
I think the point of this is to say: you haven’t been here, then you show up with a post that adds nothing and see it as contribution? Seems p worthless to me.In post 252, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not sure what problem you're having with my post even when you try to paint it in a bad light like this.In post 241, Yimmy wrote:Dunnstral: your post here is sort of worthless. first thing has already been said, second thing is basically just reiterating what was posted, and the third thing just isn't really productive because it doesn't elicit any response.
@Jake, how come you just completely ignored me?In post 234, SausasaurusRex wrote:@Jake, what was it that made you scumread me?
“A & B are the scummiest. So I’ll vote C”In post 241, Yimmy wrote:Jake and Jocus are both the scummiest by far, but I don't think they are partners because hard bussing from page 1 would be really gutsy, and I'm really not sure which one's scummier ATM. That said
VOTE: Dunnstral
I'm not letting you ride through day 1 with virtually no content
I quoted it... not long after he posted it. Read the thread please.In post 253, Dunnstral wrote:What are you referring to, by the way?In post 236, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Jocus' whole "tried to shoehorn a case, got caught, tried to cover by saying I meant it this way all along" NONSENSE is just that... nonsense. It's gross. It's laughable. Don't fall for it.
Doesn't this confirm him as scum?In post 262, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:He’s unwilling to provide additional information in the wake of his flip thus posting as little as possible is the most beneficial for him.
Nothing we can do during the day short of a slip by scum will confirm anyone. But it’s an indication towards him being a buddy if jocus flips red.In post 264, LoserdudeOG wrote:Doesn't this confirm him as scum?In post 262, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:He’s unwilling to provide additional information in the wake of his flip thus posting as little as possible is the most beneficial for him.
SausasaurusRex wrote:@Jake, how come you just completely ignored me?In post 234, SausasaurusRex wrote:@Jake, what was it that made you scumread me?
So is it a sound ISO, or did you take problem to it? Not sure what "really rounded as a pro-town player" is supposed to meanIn post 228, Jake The Wolfie wrote:PyroDerma: All in all, has a pretty sound ISO (although I did take problem to it), and really rounded as a Pro-Town player.
My thoughts at the time were "I wouldn't have thought of this, ergo it would have been even more difficult for scum to think of it" but after letting it stew for a bit I realize that's pretty silly.In post 247, LoserdudeOG wrote:Could you explain why it seems like a lot of effort? I thought it was pretty low hanging fruit that any scum could’ve jumped on? Not saying this is what happened, but it’s definitely not out of the question for me.In post 241, Yimmy wrote: Pyro's argument against Loserdude is fascinating and seems like a lot of effort for scum to come up with. Unfortunately it's moot.
It does nothing, it adds nothing, it does not help town find scum.In post 252, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not sure what problem you're having with my post even when you try to paint it in a bad light like this.In post 241, Yimmy wrote:Dunnstral: your post here is sort of worthless. first thing has already been said, second thing is basically just reiterating what was posted, and the third thing just isn't really productive because it doesn't elicit any response.
Are you saying it's essential that we lynch you??In post 258, Jocus Aevorum wrote:prodging again
I think my flip is essential today, not going aggressively for anyone's lynch right now
I really don't think Jake and Jocus are scum so together it's a 50-50 in my mind. We have four days left, I really don't think it's gonna kill us to wait another day or two so I can sort this out. And seeing as I didn't want to lynch either of them just then the most productive place for my vote is to put pressure to post on someone who didn't post. I didn't ask or expect anyone else to vote on him but I did want him to know that his behavior needs to change. To push for a wagon on a lurker at this point with people so much scummier is absurd, but votes are tools of pressure, not just killing.In post 260, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:“A & B are the scummiest. So I’ll vote C”In post 241, Yimmy wrote:Jake and Jocus are both the scummiest by far, but I don't think they are partners because hard bussing from page 1 would be really gutsy, and I'm really not sure which one's scummier ATM. That said
VOTE: Dunnstral
I'm not letting you ride through day 1 with virtually no content
No. This is an attempt to start a counterwagon. It’s time to lynch scum. Dunn will be sorted.
so are you just ignoring people who you scumread??In post 267, Jake The Wolfie wrote:SausasaurusRex wrote:@Jake, how come you just completely ignored me?In post 234, SausasaurusRex wrote:@Jake, what was it that made you scumread me?I probably scumread you because you weren't posting content.