In post 719, Wake1 wrote: In post 717, Joey_ wrote:Also i dont want to sounds like a pedantic douchebags, but this post has no sound logic in any of the sentences, its all non-sense full of fallacies
"I mean, we don't all play the same. And missing that detail doesn't automatically make one Scum. If it did then me and everyone else with ADHD would be screwed in Mafia games. Point is, I am aware of who and what now, and I don't really see how me initially missing that detail makes me Scum or Town for that matter. For example Scum could have perfectly noticed it, but would that then make them Town? To be frank I don't think so."
OK Spock.
I mean, we don't all play the same
; not a point, it doesn't invalidates the rationale
And missing that detail doesn't automatically make one Scum
; that never have been my point, also arguing over probabilities is pretty bad overall instead of attacking the rationale
If it did then me and everyone else with ADHD would be screwed in Mafia games;
thats non-sens. Missing names is much more likely to be player-styles correlated than ADHD correlated.If anything, flips are the most fucking important pieces of information in a gamea and they only happens a few times per game after 48h nights. I assure you, any ADHD kids can read two important sentences after 48h pauses.
Point is, I am aware of who and what now, and I don't really see how me initially missing that detail makes me Scum or Town for that matter;
Yes you do, i explained it to you. You not understanding my point doesn't invalidates it. Also it's not "missing a details", its a fucking flip, not a crumb aka you didn't miss anything, you just didn't feel compelled to know the names for REASONS, be it AI or player style related.
For example Scum could have perfectly noticed it, but would that then make them Town? To be frank I don't think so
Thats silly rethoric that has nothing to do with what i explained. I am arguing that A + B = C which is never invalidated by arguing that A + D = E