Micro 914: CultD3 (Over)
Forum rules
- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Bingle
-
Bingle Jack of All Trades
- Bingle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: July 21, 2019
- Location: Bad Player Jail
Not at all. I’m saying that I lied to make the case on you look stronger because I wanted to see how you and others would react. But apparently no one did the slightest bit of follow through to check my case.In post 473, shos wrote:Bungle says I am lying because I didn't express surprise at being given daytalk. Rather stupid IMO and a non-defensible argument which townies don't often make"He brings the cool and the muscle" -FakeGod
"I was playing against the timer known as bingle tbh." ~Chennisden
"it's truest in mechanical games (if he gets a gritty setup and is town in it and needs to save the day, he starts levitating and his eyes start glowing. not exaggerating, it literally happens)." ~Ducky- Bingle
-
Bingle Jack of All Trades
- Bingle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: July 21, 2019
- Location: Bad Player Jail
Subject: Micro 901 | Penguin Mafia, The Third | Mafia PT
^relevant postshos wrote:Also it's awesome that we have daytalk. *warms engine*"He brings the cool and the muscle" -FakeGod
"I was playing against the timer known as bingle tbh." ~Chennisden
"it's truest in mechanical games (if he gets a gritty setup and is town in it and needs to save the day, he starts levitating and his eyes start glowing. not exaggerating, it literally happens)." ~Ducky- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Blatant Scum
-
Blatant Scum Mafia Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: September 3, 2019
- Location: Your head
In other words: let's policy lynch two players because of their playstyle. Yes, they don't have the highest CL credit of all players and yes, we likely lose if neither of them is CL, but anyway, let's do it!In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Can we kill Blatant today and Obvious tomorrow? I really don't like their posting thus far. It feels like to me they're actively playing jestery. I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not, but I'd like to kill them tomorrow.Don’t forget about how when I asked him for a link to his scumgame, he linked THIS game. - Pyrrha Nikos
He usually never puts effort into reads like that, which does sometimes get him scumread, but since he was on an alt and we didn't know his meta, I can see CL!him making reads as an exception since he knows he'll probably be scumread otherwise.
-Hectic- Blatant Scum
-
Blatant Scum Mafia Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: September 3, 2019
- Location: Your head
I am not telling it to you, I am telling it to people who would meta me later.In post 465, Kanna wrote:
Haven't checked your meta yet, but is there a reason you're changing it + telling us you're changing it?In post 399, Blatant Scum wrote:Disclaimer:I will be off-meta in this game (I will, for example, be doing reads). Don't use information gathered in this game for reading my meta.
I don't want people from other games checking this game, finding out I was doing reads here and was town.
Then they would automatically assume that if I don't do any reads at all (which is this account meta), it means I am scum.Don’t forget about how when I asked him for a link to his scumgame, he linked THIS game. - Pyrrha Nikos
He usually never puts effort into reads like that, which does sometimes get him scumread, but since he was on an alt and we didn't know his meta, I can see CL!him making reads as an exception since he knows he'll probably be scumread otherwise.
-Hectic- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Maybe. Depends on game size and setup. I do believe i have a huge scumrange though, so i am proud to say i'm not easily readable. I would say that my strongest assets are anti-associatives and made up bullshit reads, because that's what town!me uses to scumhunt, so i focus on faking those. I think i might be weak at emotional display when rolling scum, but then again it depends on how i am pinged by people pushing me.In post 461, ObviousScum wrote:farkran would you say you're readable in your own view?Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Blatant Scum
-
Blatant Scum Mafia Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: September 3, 2019
- Location: Your head
You are "pushing the game forward" and "towny". Sheeping others make me ignore the paranoia I have about town leaders being a secret scum.In post 462, Kanna wrote:I don't really know why I'm a UTR tbh but thanks @OS and BS; any reason other than sheeping?Don’t forget about how when I asked him for a link to his scumgame, he linked THIS game. - Pyrrha Nikos
He usually never puts effort into reads like that, which does sometimes get him scumread, but since he was on an alt and we didn't know his meta, I can see CL!him making reads as an exception since he knows he'll probably be scumread otherwise.
-Hectic- Blatant Scum
-
Blatant Scum Mafia Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: September 3, 2019
- Location: Your head
*displays emotions*Don’t forget about how when I asked him for a link to his scumgame, he linked THIS game. - Pyrrha Nikos
He usually never puts effort into reads like that, which does sometimes get him scumread, but since he was on an alt and we didn't know his meta, I can see CL!him making reads as an exception since he knows he'll probably be scumread otherwise.
-Hectic- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
I just want to say I am still deeply impressed
In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
This is credit for town!bingle, but... i think that's the kind of lie no one would bother verifying. I mean, you build a case against shos over a simple, specific fact - why would people doublecheck that? For instance, i just assumed it was true because there was no reason to lie about it. Turned out there was a reason. If anything though, i think shos of all people might have recalled differently than what bingle claimed, but then again that was a long time ago so... it's NAI even for shos.In post 469, Bingle wrote:
This is a lie, and I'm disappointed that none of you caught it considering I linked literally the post before him doing so in the next post.In post 353, Bingle wrote:Both featured daychat, and he expressed no surprise over this in either.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
It was two months ago, my first game onsite after the hiatus. You can be SURE that scum-me would throw it back in his face with a big I TOLD YOU SO if this was the case. But I'm not surprised that you don't let facts disturb youIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I don't like this defense though. It's an implied shade against korina for "not believing you have the highest CL credit". Where did you deduce that you do not have the highest CL credit from korina POV? He just said that you are acting jestery and he wants you dead. How does this imply you are not the highest CL credit for him?In post 479, Blatant Scum wrote:
In other words: let's policy lynch two players because of their playstyle. Yes, they don't have the highest CL credit of all players and yes, we likely lose if neither of them is CL, but anyway, let's do it!In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Can we kill Blatant today and Obvious tomorrow? I really don't like their posting thus far. It feels like to me they're actively playing jestery. I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not, but I'd like to kill them tomorrow.Farkran is back poggers-Alisae- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Obum, why is Kanna town and I specifically non-CL? How do you differentiate?
SH0S YOU'RE WEIRD
I need to meta check you again.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
Where you at, Poyzin? Why is Nolly (now Bla) "probably a cultist but not sure about cult leader"?- Blatant Scum
-
Blatant Scum Mafia Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2007
- Joined: September 3, 2019
- Location: Your head
In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:I don't know if it's indicative of CL or notDon’t forget about how when I asked him for a link to his scumgame, he linked THIS game. - Pyrrha Nikos
He usually never puts effort into reads like that, which does sometimes get him scumread, but since he was on an alt and we didn't know his meta, I can see CL!him making reads as an exception since he knows he'll probably be scumread otherwise.
-Hectic- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I think any!shos would have forgot about his own specific reaction after two months, otherwise you would have answered from memory, not from checking your posts in that game. And if you forgot your reaction, you probably wouldn't check because you assume there's no reason for bingle to lie. This is valid for any!shos and more generally for everyone, i don't see a shos who checks if bingle lied about that - it's an easily verifiable lie, so i would think most people would just assume it's true, and work from there. Which, for instance, is exactly what you did - proceed to defend yourself instead of checking. But again, even town!shos would have done that.In post 487, shos wrote:It was two months ago, my first game onsite after the hiatus. You can be SURE that scum-me would throw it back in his face with a big I TOLD YOU SO if this was the case. But I'm not surprised that you don't let facts disturb youFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- Farkran
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Farkran
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Yeah. Where does it say that it ISN'T indicative of CL?In post 491, Blatant Scum wrote:In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:I don't know if it's indicative of CL or notFarkran is back poggers-Alisae- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Town shos DID answer from memory here. Which is why I didn't fish it up. Scum show would have checked it meticulously to find a single post where it may even remotely look as if I may be surprised and shove it up his butt all the way through the colon until it's out the mouth, pick it up and shove it back again.In post 492, Farkran wrote:
I think any!shos would have forgot about his own specific reaction after two months, otherwise you would have answered from memory, not from checking your posts in that game. And if you forgot your reaction, you probably wouldn't check because you assume there's no reason for bingle to lie. This is valid for any!shos and more generally for everyone, i don't see a shos who checks if bingle lied about that - it's an easily verifiable lie, so i would think most people would just assume it's true, and work from there. Which, for instance, is exactly what you did - proceed to defend yourself instead of checking. But again, even town!shos would have done that.In post 487, shos wrote:It was two months ago, my first game onsite after the hiatus. You can be SURE that scum-me would throw it back in his face with a big I TOLD YOU SO if this was the case. But I'm not surprised that you don't let facts disturb youIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Ill go even further and say that shosscum would have pushed a policy Lynch based on Lynch all liars thereIn post 494, shos wrote:
Town shos DID answer from memory here. Which is why I didn't fish it up. Scum show would have checked it meticulously to find a single post where it may even remotely look as if I may be surprised and shove it up his butt all the way through the colon until it's out the mouth, pick it up and shove it back again.In post 492, Farkran wrote:
I think any!shos would have forgot about his own specific reaction after two months, otherwise you would have answered from memory, not from checking your posts in that game. And if you forgot your reaction, you probably wouldn't check because you assume there's no reason for bingle to lie. This is valid for any!shos and more generally for everyone, i don't see a shos who checks if bingle lied about that - it's an easily verifiable lie, so i would think most people would just assume it's true, and work from there. Which, for instance, is exactly what you did - proceed to defend yourself instead of checking. But again, even town!shos would have done that.In post 487, shos wrote:It was two months ago, my first game onsite after the hiatus. You can be SURE that scum-me would throw it back in his face with a big I TOLD YOU SO if this was the case. But I'm not surprised that you don't let facts disturb you
I mean, this move was brilliant. Fucking amazing.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.- Hectic
-
Hectic Mad Hatter
- Hectic
- Mad Hatter
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 9613
- Joined: June 30, 2019
- Location: Dire Dire Docks
- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Not A Korina Alt
-
Not A Korina Alt Goon
- Not A Korina Alt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 154
- Joined: December 31, 2019
No, this is not a policy because of your playstyle. You and Obvious are acting like jesters and actively making the game unreadable—not to mention, your play willIn post 479, Blatant Scum wrote:
In other words: let's policy lynch two players because of their playstyle. Yes, they don't have the highest CL credit of all players and yes, we likely lose if neither of them is CL, but anyway, let's do it!In post 455, Not A Korina Alt wrote:Can we kill Blatant today and Obvious tomorrow? I really don't like their posting thus far. It feels like to me they're actively playing jestery. I don't know if it's indicative of CL or not, but I'd like to kill them tomorrow.undoubtedlydraw the tracker/cop onto whichever one of you survives tonight. In what universe does a townie decide to do this? None. In what universe does scum decide to do this? Many. Therefore, you are scum, and you must die. I'm not arguing this any further.
We lynch Blatant today, and Obvious tomorrow.I am totally not a Korina alt. That would be absurd. Why would you ever think that I'm an alt of him?
#CultsArentBastard- Not A Korina Alt
-
Not A Korina Alt Goon
- Not A Korina Alt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 154
- Joined: December 31, 2019
- Not A Korina Alt
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Not A Korina Alt
- Hectic
- shos
- shos
- Farkran
- Farkran
- Blatant Scum
- Hectic
- Hectic
- Farkran
- shos
- Farkran
- shos
- Blatant Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Farkran
- Blatant Scum
- Blatant Scum
- Bingle
- Bingle