Micro 922: Strawberry Mafia (Game over!)

[Slaxx]

Also, is the fact the Hectic slot had two completely opposite reads on me and was puzzled when they contradicted... town or mafia indicative? I think it might be town indicative.

[Slaxx]

Ha that’s what you get for prodding me I took your page top.

[Slaxx]

VOTE: Compath

YOLO

[Ame]

@Slaxx what was it you were waiting on for your Luca read before?

[Slaxx]

Clidd’s reaction to me not giving my read on him. I wanted that situation fully fleshed out and to see where he landed.

Before that I just didn’t have a read on Luca. There were things I liked and things I didn’t but nothing was as substantial as defusing the 1v1.

[DrDolittle]

is compath scum? hm

[Ame]

VOTE: Iconeum

This is the way to go.

[Ame]

I intentionally left my Ico analysis short because I needed to reevaluate. I've reevaluated and did a meta dive. This is scum Ico. I'll go into more details when I'm on a computer, but in the meantime all town comrades feel free to join me, blindly or boldly.

[Hectic]

Officer "Officer" Officer checking in for a hard day of work.

VOTE: DDL

The Assistant Horse Trainer would like to know why Wyvern Iconeum decided to move here. Additionally, whether he had a look at the archives trainee "trainee" trainee presented on Professor Clidd, and what he made of them.

433 - This seems ok, but the timing of it is fishy to me - I've had a lot of content since early game, so why is Hectic only now casing my early game 'friendliness' when he'd noticed it earlier?

The friendly thing isn't scum-indicative; I'm just trying to have a more laid-back approach in general, and I usually start games slowly regardless of alignment. The exceptions are when a game gets off to a very slow start and I feel compelled to get it moving myself.

Inform Knight Luca that The Force was pinged by the more recent posts in the More Evidence section, which is when they decided to look back and found similarities between the early posts and the ones from his previous lawbreaker game.

However, upon further evaluation and examining his lawbreaker game before that one, we found the the identified traits are not present there, and so we may be inclined to believe him when he says he has just decided to take a more laid back approach in recent times, and that this is NAI.

.
.
.

More to come.

[Slaxx]

We aren’t cohesive at all here.

[Ame]

Trust Ame imo.

[Hectic]

Inspector "Inspector" Inspector inspecting the shit out of this.

(case)

Got some problems with this case.

88 has up to 4! scumreads and myself as joker. The way this post is formulated isn't intended to sort anyone, it's conclusions being drawn. In post 88.

123 says that his previous scumleans are meant to instigate interaction, but doesn't engage with them. He's literally trying to appear scumhunting while not.

235 'i don't vote early', but Clidd also isn't pressuring

any

of his scumreads. I feel he's trying to lay low and not draw too much attention by this.

These are contradictory. You state he's scumreading too many people and wants to appear like he's scumhnting but isn't, but then say he's trying to "law low" by not voting anyone. Isn't scumreading 4 people the opposite of "laying low"?

237 is pure shade on Slaxx, the slot who is scumreading Clidd at that time

334 shades me. Same in 335

Why is "casting shade" scum-indicative here? You just implied he was trying to law low by not voting, this doesn't look like he's laying low but is presenting his thoughts and comparing play he finds lawbreakery to previous lawbreakers he has imprisoned.

410 new readlist, while after all of this I am still considered the 'joker'. This doesn't match his previous posts where he was certain I'm scum.

This is a good point. I'd like to hear from Clidd why he expressed such confidence on lawbreaker!Iconeum, but to then place him under the Joker category anyway. If it had something to do with the engagement with him leading up to the reads list, I'd like to hear what changed his mind.

257 sooooo many words but what do they say? Close to nothing?
416 So. Many. Words. To say what? I still don't know.

These are NAI, and we'd like to hear whether you agree once you look over his meta.

Cool, I'm out.

[clidd]

I will wait for you analysis, Detective

Ame

. From Ico's reaction, I do not believe that it would be omitting something there about FoS on me. Seeing from an emotional point of view, of course. I am not considering the logical factor of the act. I still consider that the lack of experience with my pattern may have influenced the initial reads, giving the idea of ​​a tunnel, when in reality, it is a precaution in the face of the unknown.

[Hectic]

trainee "trainee" trainee is also here

for now VOTE: Iconeum L-2

[Luca Blight]

VOTE: Icon

L-1

[clidd]

Ico

, you are L-1. I believe that you are a good person to be practicing a malicious activity like lying, right ? am I correct in assuming that you were sincere in answering why you thought of my playstyle ?

[Ame]

UNVOTE: Iconeum

I'll vote again when it's time, but I no longer trust leaving someone at L1

[Ame]

@Luca why did you feel Compath over Iconeum before. You made multi-post case on Ico and barely anything on Compath.

Also I've been feeling a lack of force behind your pushes this game. Where's the spirit?

[Ame]

@Slaxx:

@Slaxx, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly what changed your opinion on 8 and 9 as indicated in your 227? And what influenced his placement in your 231 list?

[Kanna]

@Ame, what was it you wanted me to clarify exactly? Why I asked you about the RQS questions?

[Kanna]

@Luca, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly your reasoning as of 129?
@Hectic, can you provide and explain your Compath read?
@Slaxx, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly what changed your opinion on 8 and 9 as indicated in your 227? And what influenced his placement in your 231 list?
@Ico, can you elaborate on why you were reading Compath as town as of 321? Additionally, why were you worried Compath had a meta read of you if he was town reading you (185)? Additionally, why did you ask who Compath was in 28 but not ask the same of me?
@Kanna, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly your reasoning as of 328.

Additionally, I'd like to know what each of you thinks about the points I made against Compath.

I’m on mobile so I can’t give examples, but I remember a chain of their posts being really townie a few pages back. I do want to take another look since it’s been a while + I didn’t agree with their readlist.

[Kanna]

@Luca, what makes you so sure clidd is town if you've seen him do posts like this as scum?

Clidd typed that post before he even knew he was scum, therefore it didn't come from a scum mindset.

What do you mean? Don’t you have to confirm your role before you play? ???

[Luca Blight]

@Luca why did you feel Compath over Iconeum before. You made multi-post case on Ico and barely anything on Compath.

Also I've been feeling a lack of force behind your pushes this game. Where's the spirit?

I wrongly hard SR Icon in the last game we were in together, so it’s possible I’m wrong even though I think he’s scum. Compath’s play has no redeeming features so I felt more comfortable lynching there, but as I said I’m ok lynching either of them.

You seem to always say my pushes lack force, maybe that’s just my play style? I don’t normally push really hard unless I’m convinced someone is scum.

Traveling atm, will continue when I get back home.

[Luca Blight]

@Luca, what makes you so sure clidd is town if you've seen him do posts like this as scum?

Clidd typed that post before he even knew he was scum, therefore it didn't come from a scum mindset.

What do you mean? Don’t you have to confirm your role before you play? ???

Read his iso from that game, he typed that post before he was sent his role PM.

[Kanna]

Spoiler:

Spoiler:

@Kanna, why a strong 7?

was just feeling a ~7

Also current reads?

Right now it's

<Compath, Ame, Ico>

<Hectic, DDL, Clidd> ---null
<Slaxx>
<Luca>

Slaxx was scummy before Luca's push, but the reasoning for Luca's push felt weird to me. If it's TvS, scum is Luca imo

You ignored my response to your reason for SR’ing me in 217. Why is that?

Is there anything you want to engage me about regarding the Slaxx push?

Also for this, I didn't ignore that reasoning, my reasoning for SRing you was because of your reasoning wrt to the Slaxx push. Don't have any questions for you about that though.

Your initial SR on me was because I reacted differently to RQS than the linked game:

Actually VOTE: Luca Blight I had a look at that game you linked and you were reallllyyy against RQS there, why were you accepting of Ame in this game?

Also you said this but this is *after* you already trusted them (if that makes sense)

The difference though is that in that newbie game the player (Spangled) didn't hold onto the RQS, whereas Ame is.

What is the scum motivation behind insisting everyone answers the questions?

You ignored my explanation for this and instead found another reason to SR me, without making any effort to actually engage me about it.

I’m sure I said I didn’t ignore your reasoning. I read it, but it was an “eh,” because I could see it coming from either alignment. I would’ve been fine with reconsidering you later if you did something townie, but then the you vs slaxx thing happened and I didn’t like how you acted. It was a reaction so I don’t know why you’re holding onto the fact I didn’t engage you with it.