If Alch gets a lot more active, then I can consider moving off.In post 1948, OkaPoka wrote:can i interest you lovelies in the death of a certain eddie cane
This includes the whole building consensus thing with other actives, etc
If Alch gets a lot more active, then I can consider moving off.In post 1948, OkaPoka wrote:can i interest you lovelies in the death of a certain eddie cane
I'm voting iDany because Oka asked me to.In post 1945, Auro wrote:Alchemist, I'd like to see you engage with other actives (OkaPoka/Something_Smart) to try and reach consensus with their reads.
The difference is I'd have time to actually post a defense if you do it now which they could also read and say "Alch's a bad lynch" before they vote or have time to unvote. This should have been clearly understood already.What you said about deadline voters can also hold if I case you right now, no? They could easily pop up at deadline, quote the case I post right now, and vote.
Maybe but I kinda buy the (pseudo)trust tell. Would rather lynch Danflor before EC because my reason on Danflor scum can be summed up as "scumDannflor Towncased Eddie."
Dude, it's NOT ABOUT YOU here. It's not about making you change your read or your vote. It's about these others and what they might do. There's no way you're reading my posts and failing to understand my issue here.In post 1953, Auro wrote:I don't want to see a rebuttal to my scumread, Alchemist.
I don't think that will help me, or make me reconsider.
Well shit. I haven't been in Team Mafia the last 2 times it was run so I didn't know.In post 1954, OkaPoka wrote:dude
its a reference to team mafia where elements did that and then got modkilled
aka eddie wants to show us how he really doesn't care about this game
I don't think any Townie would have towncased Eddie that way because Eddie wasn't doing shit. And the Towncase itself was based on Eddie not doing shit. Maybe if they had a lot of history together but nobody has shown me that's true so yeah.In post 1955, Auro wrote:Note that Dannfloor is being replaced, and it's probable we'll have an active slot.
Would town!Dannfloor not towncase Eddie the way he did?
Tell me how Town Auro completely fails to understand what I was saying in my last several posts.In post 1958, OkaPoka wrote:guys this is unproductive i dont want to lynch efforters maybe tmr?
Wasn't that contingent on me moving off you after hearing your rebuttal? If I don't, they can still just deadline vote you saying "Auro case gud", no. If they change their own minds based on your rebuttal... They can do so before deadline, too.In post 1956, Alchemist21 wrote:It's about these others and what they might do.
that's 3 or 4 townIn post 1928, OkaPoka wrote:how about i list off people who i feel like wont lynch idany
eddie cane, comical, penguin, rcenigma
i explicitly do not town read iDanyIn post 1929, Auro wrote:So no one's explicitly townreading iDany or opposing his lynch, yes?
this is the worst timelineIn post 1930, schadd_ wrote:replacing dannflor. prodding rcenigma