In post 1398, clidd wrote:I believe I know how to recognize when the player reaches the limit and ends up "exploding" and asks for substitution. It happened to me once.
Seems kind of early in response to mere skepticism.
In post 1398, clidd wrote:I believe I know how to recognize when the player reaches the limit and ends up "exploding" and asks for substitution. It happened to me once.
Yes, very likely. But at the moment it is more plausible to wait for a replacement to enter the slot and restart the claim subject, so we can better evaluate the slot outside of this AtE spectrum to facilitate the general understanding of whether it is town or not.Hectic wrote:Do you think this is one of those times, clidd?
No, it didn't start today. Probably something had been bothering him since D1, until it became a snowball and probably exploded when you touched on the subject of his claim. Players react differently to stress. This, of course, is that I am not considering external factors. But it is merely speculation, so it is better to consider NAI for now.In post 1400, Wake1 wrote: Seems kind of early in response to mere skepticism.
OK but you're wrong though.In post 1408, profii wrote:Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher
Baloney
In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.
VOTE: wake88
In post 1408, profii wrote:Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher
Baloney
In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.
VOTE: wake88
either way needs to be dealt with asapIn post 1411, bob3141 wrote:In post 1408, profii wrote:Someone said something about scum avoiding the protective because they are scared of the watcher
Baloney
In a game where scum claim their PRs openly on day 1, they cherry pick kills to make you think that.
VOTE: wake88
Migth of been me but i said it coild mean 3 things. One was that but also that one of the claims is fake
I just cant see scum not trying to get rid of dave or wake if they could. If scum have rb ability left. Waka or dave would have died. If they just have utility role then it asks the question how would they deal with dave/waka
Without having read anything else or knowing what this refers to, I believe this statement to be true.In post 1414, profii wrote:There is a logic to say if we believe Dave and mislynch him on purpose, we reduce the collateral damage and if he was lying, we hit scum.
Well Dave read my crumb right, kinda. I’m an Ascetic Townie.In post 1382, davesaz wrote:Gamma crumbed PGO.
In post 1404, Hectic wrote:Fair assessment. But there were indications he was getting increasingly frustrated from moments from yesterday as well.
Anyway, Gamma disappearing to post elsewhere on-site rather than claim is a hum de dum.
YesIn post 1421, LuckyLuciano wrote:^ I take the above post to mean that my old self has claimed.