In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alisae. You’re honestly just being annoying. Can you stop shouting and drowning the thread with garbage just to get things your way?
In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alisae. You’re honestly just being annoying. Can you stop shouting and drowning the thread with garbage just to get things your way?
In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alisae. You’re honestly just being annoying. Can you stop shouting and drowning the thread with garbage just to get things your way?
How can I be annoying if I'm scum?
I wouldn’t be surprised if you are.
no i am literally asking you, because you apparently believe that I am scum.
How can I be scum, and annoy you at the same time?
I'm playing to wincon if I'm scum lmao.
In post 966, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Second, GC's positioning makes him town? He's on a wagon with most of his scumreads.
I’m going to hit this, because it’s right there, but if you base who you do and don’t vote based on associative theories of other people who are voting, when there is no flip yet, you are playing wrong. It’s worse than assuming a player is town to do a wagon analysis.
Why? Because you would be refusing to vote someone who is acting in a manner that deserves your vote simply because you have suspected other people who have decided to also vote that person. Not only are you possibly wrong about those other people, but also they could be bussing if you’re right. It’s a bad way to negate legitimate suspicions/votes on players.
I’m sure someone else has explained this better in a wiki or something.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alisae. You’re honestly just being annoying. Can you stop shouting and drowning the thread with garbage just to get things your way?
How can I be annoying if I'm scum?
I wouldn’t be surprised if you are.
no i am literally asking you, because you apparently believe that I am scum.
How can I be scum, and annoy you at the same time?
I'm playing to wincon if I'm scum lmao.
In post 978, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alisae. You’re honestly just being annoying. Can you stop shouting and drowning the thread with garbage just to get things your way?
How can I be annoying if I'm scum?
I wouldn’t be surprised if you are.
no i am literally asking you, because you apparently believe that I am scum.
How can I be scum, and annoy you at the same time?
I'm playing to wincon if I'm scum lmao.
Reading this gave me a stroke.
I don't get it and depending on your answer, i could probably just 180 completely tbh
I’ve accepted other players’ rationales for voting, when I found them convincing.
Honestly not sure how else you’re supposed to play unless you *only* follow suspicions you personally come up with.
I haven’t sheeped anyone in the sense of voting a player just because someone else did, like FB or votato has done.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Alright I’m going to reread these shenanigans y’all folks in the future decided to get into while we were sleeping stateside.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
you know what
i hate you norwee (not actually just ur making this frustrating lmao)
i am going to admit
that i probably do not know how you play this game at all
i don't think i agree with it but this is giving me flashbacks to the normal where I had issues reading you and you reacted similarly
and now there is this seed of doubt that was planted
Like, this amount of pressure just to lynch me is ridiculuous. And it feeds into Alisae’s scum range. But the fact that they openly admit they could easily 180 it makes me curious if i’ve read the game wrong.
Can you talk me into why Isis is your natural next step assuming i’m town Alisae?
if you do that it's just going to be an inevitable cycle men lynch. Everyone wants a lynch and cycle men has the most so the people on it are most likely just gonna leave their votes there adn wait for everyone to panic move onto him.
I'm happy for a cycle or human lynch but i'd prefer the latter VOTE: human
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
In post 995, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Like, this amount of pressure just to lynch me is ridiculuous. And it feeds into Alisae’s scum range. But the fact that they openly admit they could easily 180 it makes me curious if i’ve read the game wrong.
Can you talk me into why Isis is your natural next step assuming i’m town Alisae?
because if ur town, abr is likely town, u2 positioned yourselfs against Isis and I don't think Isis is town if both of you two are
