yeah thats why its maybe a slipIn post 4949, Auro wrote:It's a slip only if that's true, no?
probably won't know unless hectic stops trolling
yeah thats why its maybe a slipIn post 4949, Auro wrote:It's a slip only if that's true, no?
Fuck that, no it isn't.In post 4952, OkaPoka wrote:all of scumhunting is looking for slips
Imean, Jake is a bad lynch and the Quick wagon dissolved.In post 4935, Nero Cain wrote:says the guy voting not Quick or Jake.In post 4860, Aristophanes wrote:TSE was a dumb counterwagon to Quick and/or Jake.
dunno what the first sentence is.In post 4955, davesaz wrote:I'm leaning on people who are openly not scumhunting.
Hoctac is the current wagon but unfortunately it's a very target-rich environment.
In post 4864, Blair wrote:If you really believe this, wouldn't it be more prudent for you to be voting for Quick and/or Jake?In post 4860, Aristophanes wrote:TSE was a dumb counterwagon to Quick and/or Jake.
In post 4935, Nero Cain wrote:says the guy voting not Quick or Jake.In post 4860, Aristophanes wrote:TSE was a dumb counterwagon to Quick and/or Jake.
Almo is right here about the "slip"In post 4943, Almost50 wrote:What kind of slip are people talking about? That the infected stat dying the next night?? IF that's it, I see no slip. Scum can only kill the infected on N2 because there were no infections at the start of N1 is how I got it. If that's not the slip, can someone please point me to it?
I'm not convinced that the "slip" is even true. It sounds to me like killing infected players is
There are multiple reasons they would want to, I would think.In post 4961, Blair wrote:I'm not convinced that the "slip" is even true. It sounds to me like killing infected players is optional for the mafia and, given their win condition, it seems like maybe they wouldn't even want to?
I’ll be honest.In post 4958, Blair wrote:In post 4864, Blair wrote:If you really believe this, wouldn't it be more prudent for you to be voting for Quick and/or Jake?In post 4860, Aristophanes wrote:TSE was a dumb counterwagon to Quick and/or Jake.In post 4935, Nero Cain wrote:says the guy voting not Quick or Jake.In post 4860, Aristophanes wrote:TSE was a dumb counterwagon to Quick and/or Jake.
Maybe Hactoc wants to get lynched and this is bad for Town???In post 4822, Hoctac wrote:Infected die start of the next night so we'd just be wasting our only ways of killing the original scum.
Quick, what does that even mean?
mastina has been paying attention to her dearest of dear friends (one of the only ones she has and which she is terrified above all other friends of losing) and trying to help them out for the last two days while suffering from absolutely soul-crushing debilitating crippling depression that has hindered her ability to do things while still trying to juggle...well, doing things. She decided that helping out her dearest of dear friends was more important than any game of mafia ever could be.In post 4720, Blair wrote:Also, where did mastina go and why did she ignore my question?
Sure, go ahead and believe that if you want in spite of me having laid out exactly what I would do when infected. Makes perfect sense for me to have not changed at all between D1 and D2 in spite of the alignment change and me having explicitly told you precisely what I'd do if I were infected.In post 4722, Nero Cain wrote:Mastina probISinfected. That whole "your going out of your way to scumread me and get me scum read" is just so whiney. She'd also make a ton of sense to be infected n1. Sorry, FL.
Do we actually know this to be the case?In post 4964, Auro wrote:Infected will be pushing randomly and may fail to align with scum, so a bunch of infected people in thread may not allow a favorable outcome (since they can end up lynching each other as well and it feels better for scum to lynch town over infected).
For those too lazy to look:In post 4970, mastina wrote:Sure, go ahead and believe that if you want in spite of me having laid out exactly what I would do when infected. Makes perfect sense for me to have not changed at all between D1 and D2 in spite of the alignment change and me having explicitly told you precisely what I'd do if I were infected.In post 4722, Nero Cain wrote:Mastina probISinfected. That whole "your going out of your way to scumread me and get me scum read" is just so whiney. She'd also make a ton of sense to be infected n1. Sorry, FL.
In post 1630, mastina wrote:Eh. If the scum infect me, it's their loss--literally. When I say there's a night and day difference between my towngame and my scumgame right now, that I fundamentally cannot get myself to put in more than the bare minimum,In post 692, Nero Cain wrote:As someone that normally finds Mastina scummy, I rather not lynch her today. OFC the inverse of that argument is that I don't want to have to worry about an infected Mastina (if I'm right that she's town) and lynching her would alleviate that.I'm not joking, sothere would be an immediate.starkcontrast in my behavior, where, sure, I'd still be posting once a day to avoid getting prodded, but my content would plummet off a cliff into nonexistence pretty much
Plus, scum infecting me would, presumably, be obvious when I'd flip as originally-town-that-was-infected, tantamount to the scum nightkilling me, soooo. If the scum want to spend what amounts to basically a factional nightkill on me, then who am I to complain? It means they saw me as a threat. That's an honor.
In post 2123, mastina wrote:I mean. Circa two years ago my scumplay was among the best of the best onsite, but I don't know what happened to it, a year and a half of having drawn almost exclusively town role PMs (I went over 20 games in a row without drawing scum!), and for whatever reason. I just. Haven't been able to play scum worth a damn this year. Give me a little time and I can give you some examples demonstrating the utter lack of ability to play that alignment. While, admittedly, many of these scumgames had extenuating circumstances which incentivized that lack of playing scum, not all of them had it and even ones whichIn post 1947, Vecna wrote:Also, her statements that she always makes that her scum game is oh so bad is not always actually the case.shouldn'thave been that way, ones which Ishouldhave been able to play to my fullest at the level scumastina is known for.
Well.
I just.
Didn't.
So.
My scumgame in 2020 is, yes, objectively--terrible, demonstrably so. I will admit. It having been objectively terrible in every single scumgame this year does not mean that I couldn't magically have a scumastina performance at the level I'm usually known for! It could happen! But it hasn't, multiple times, hasn't. Why, dunno. Just is.
I mean, cult game, so. I'm town today, but obviously I can't promise you that I'llIn post 1947, Vecna wrote:Anyways, she is overwhelmingly more likely to be town here, but dont get too convinced on that fact without keeping that sharp eye.staytown. (I mean. Scum's mistake if they infect me, but like. While it's obviously a mistake for scum to infect me. Scum aren't immune to making mistakes, so. Could happen in spite of how objectively terrible a move it'd be.) So like. Future days, keep an eye on what I am doing.If I have a sudden inexplicable abrupt dropoff in contributions and activities, chances are.fairlyhigh that the cause is that I'm no longer town
That dropoff in activity hasn't happened yet. (Well. Not really happened. I am posting less than I would like, and I am still disappearing more often than would be ideal, contributing less than would be optimal. But, 1: I am still, very obviously,In post 2854, mastina wrote:I'm not infected yet!In post 2812, Auro wrote:Btw, infected should claim
In post 4675, Blair wrote:Mastina, are you accusing Nero of being scum?
If you are not, then what is the purpose of this exchange?
I feel this is what I said.In post 4722, Nero Cain wrote:Mastina probISinfected. That whole "your going out of your way to scumread me and get me scum read" is just so whiney.
She'd also make a ton of sense to be infected n1. Sorry, FL.