Mini 2144: Yu-Gi-Oh Card UPick Game Over - Good Cards Win.

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #925 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:53 pm

You claiming in this way allows for an easy double mislynch for scum!you.

Socratés · Post Post #926 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:53 pm

When it's much easier to just sit back and join the Shireen wagon, and then make a case on Acryon tomorrow and get him lynched.

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #927 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:55 pm

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #928 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:58 pm

I can also see a position where you and Acryon are scum together if Elsa's abiity failed. But that's a stretch, still on the back of my head

Socratés · Post Post #929 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 10:05 pm

Wouldn't Elsa's ability succeed if we're aligned with each other?

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #930 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 10:09 pm

In post 929, Socratés wrote:Wouldn't Elsa's ability succeed if we're aligned with each other?

Oh?
I thought it succeeds if both aren't fusions but fails if at least one is

Socratés · Post Post #931 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2020 10:21 pm

In post 503, Elsa Jay wrote:I pick 2 people at night and I compare them. If they're both non fusions it succeeds and 'fuse', but if I cross paths with a fusion monster it fails.

With "a" fusion monster: Elsa, you do mean exactly one should be a fusion monster, yes?
Otherwise it's not really a parity check.

Elsa Jay · Post Post #932 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:53 am

How many times do I gotta explain it? I fail on Fusion Monsters because under most circumstances you can't use them as fusion material again. Luckily neither of you were fusion monsters.

Also, since you claimed and mainly because I don't trust how acyron reacted, you guys did actually give different results.

Granted that technically means since its Multiball you could be differently aligned scum but either case, I trust Soc more that Acy.

acryon · Post Post #933 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:57 am

In post 872, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are you shitting me? I voted there because of a red-check, and how is my claim more of a scummy one? It's literally just a one-way bus driver. How is my last claimed night action scummy? Just stop

It's more PoE here than anything, and sorry I was referring to the N1 claim because you haven't said what you did for N2 yet. My only point with it feeling scummy is that you kept yourself from being investigated.

In post 870, Alduskkel wrote:
acyron avoids taking a stance on jjh, and later on clearly sided with lynching Jake over lynching jjh. This post in particular also pings my gut:
In post 764, acryon wrote:
In post 735, jjh927 wrote:Ngl if I'm gonna be mislynched in another game, I'll be glad if it's this one

Not gonna fight this very hard
If you're town you should probably fight here.
I couldn't glean much from jjh's iso, but:
-Elsa is basically conftown if that wasn't obvious
-jjh called Espeonage hard town early on, I can't decide if a scum partner would do that
-presence on the brief oronoko wagon is weak evidence for town-oronoko

Overall I'd say we should lynch acryon but I won't vote yet so that elsa doesn't get angry at me lol

FWIW, I said something to a similar effect to Crimson as well in 533.

In post 876, JacksonVirgo wrote:Acryon you also posted a link to my post in you Aldusk part

Oops. Should be 672 not 627.

In post 910, Socratés wrote:I've been saying we should lynch Acryon, no?
He bent over his back trying to explain how lynching Jake was the optimal play, but it was a mechanical 1v1. You could take his post and replace "Jake" with jjh and the same arguments would apply.
His intent was to clearly buy a little more time. There's the appeal to jjh to play townier as well.

Unless I've misinterpreted something about the mechanics?

Can you explain to me how it's actually a mechanical 1v1? Once again, a lying Jake there puts us at risk of 2 mislynches because we have to lynch both Elsa and jjh due to his role--we only would know he's lying after both flipping town. A lying jjh puts us at risk of at most, 1, because if we lynch Jake, we immediately know scum is jjh.

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #934 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 2:18 am

In post 933, acryon wrote:
In post 872, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are you shitting me? I voted there because of a red-check, and how is my claim more of a scummy one? It's literally just a one-way bus driver. How is my last claimed night action scummy? Just stop
It's more PoE here than anything, and sorry I was referring to the N1 claim because you haven't said what you did for N2 yet. My only point with it feeling scummy is that you kept yourself from being investigated.

Why would I not just *not* claim that I swapped us and just reap the benefits of being cleared?

acryon · Post Post #935 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 2:23 am

In post 934, JacksonVirgo wrote:
In post 933, acryon wrote:
In post 872, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are you shitting me? I voted there because of a red-check, and how is my claim more of a scummy one? It's literally just a one-way bus driver. How is my last claimed night action scummy? Just stop
It's more PoE here than anything, and sorry I was referring to the N1 claim because you haven't said what you did for N2 yet. My only point with it feeling scummy is that you kept yourself from being investigated.

Why would I not just *not* claim that I swapped us and just reap the benefits of being cleared?

I'm not sure, but I also thought it made no sense for scum!jjh to claim to do what he did there when he could've reaped the benefits of RBing the Cop, so that doesn't seem like the best argument right now.

Porkens · Post Post #936 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:36 am

Mornin.

Porkens · Post Post #937 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:36 am

Mornin. Woof

Porkens · Post Post #938 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:36 am

I’m gunna cry woof

Porkens · Post Post #939 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:47 am

VOTE: aldiskkel woof you, seriously.

acryon · Post Post #940 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:51 am

In post 939, Porkens wrote:VOTE: aldiskkel woof you, seriously.

Why?

Porkens · Post Post #941 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:24 am

Woof he cursed me with this garbage and it’s not a protown thing to do.

Porkens · Post Post #942 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:24 am

Woof also it’s pissing me off

Elsa Jay · Post Post #943 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:36 am

We got better targets Porkie. Granted that name alone with its spelling makes it hard to remember so I'd get rid of it too, but still.

For those in thw back who didn't catch it the first time, Acyron and Socrates are different alignments,

acryon · Post Post #944 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:38 am

In post 943, Elsa Jay wrote:We got better targets Porkie. Granted that name alone with its spelling makes it hard to remember so I'd get rid of it too, but still.

For those in thw back who didn't catch it the first time, Acyron and Socrates are different alignments,

And we're sure nobody messed with your ability in any way? I just have a hard time seeing Socrates as scum here.

Elsa Jay · Post Post #945 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:56 am

Pretty dang hard to mess with my friend.

acryon · Post Post #946 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:58 am

In post 945, Elsa Jay wrote:Pretty dang hard to mess with my friend.

Considering it was messed with in

two

different ways N1, I'm not sure that's accurate

acryon · Post Post #947 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 5:59 am

Keeping my vote on JV until everyone has a chance to respond and we can confirm there was no funny business.

Elsa Jay · Post Post #948 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 6:08 am

In post 946, acryon wrote:
In post 945, Elsa Jay wrote:Pretty dang hard to mess with my friend.
Considering it was messed with in
two
different ways N1, I'm not sure that's accurate

One of them was scum and dead, while the other cinfirmed they didn't touch those 2.

Try again.

acryon · Post Post #949 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2020 6:11 am

In post 948, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 946, acryon wrote:
In post 945, Elsa Jay wrote:Pretty dang hard to mess with my friend.
Considering it was messed with in
two
different ways N1, I'm not sure that's accurate
One of them was scum and dead, while the other cinfirmed they didn't touch those 2.

Try again.

We have a number of unknowns PRs at this point. And I'm not sure what you mean by "try again". I'm not trying to discredit you--you are conftown to me. I just want to be sure that the result hasn't been messed with before I vote someone I otherwise townread.