He has since inspired a generation of libertarians.
- NDMath has replaced Rozyroz.
- I am still on holiday celebrating midsummer. Vote counts will increase in frequency starting Sunday.
But what IF bussing?In post 626, mavsfan41 wrote:But in a very short span she votes GL, unvotes him. Later she mentions GL in 493 but also is critical of Norwegian in 494 & 496. I’m not sure scum!Nauci unvotes GL and makes 494 & 496. This seems to me like town reconsidering between the two whereas scum would’ve parked the vote and called it a day.
that is the question, it'll stop when i feel like it is the best answer i can give uIn post 620, Looker wrote:My question is how long will this shtick go on? "Norway told me" isn't going to be a valid excuse.
What does that mean?In post 629, popopopopopopo wrote:that is the question, it'll stop when i feel like it is the best answer i can give uIn post 620, Looker wrote:My question is how long will this shtick go on? "Norway told me" isn't going to be a valid excuse.
juicy - informativeIn post 544, Looker wrote:Define "juicy".
How was I shading popopo as scum as opposed to lazy/someone who's only pretending to scumhunt?
I generally don't think it's S-S cause I agree with you, it feels too over the top. I do think it's likely at least one of them is scum though. If I thought they were definitely buddies, I would have just stayed on Norway, the point of switching was to switch gears to pressure popopopopopopopopo while still feeling out what the game state looks like if Norway and myself is TvT after all.In post 551, mavsfan41 wrote:I can’t help but feel your progression to Popopo was after testing the waters for a Norwegian lynch then going to a much too easy scum linking of Norwegian/popopo. Surely scum won’t be that ballsy to pull off voting pattern like that?
@GL: do you still have a Popopo/Norwegian scum pairing?
what attention am I "deflecting"? I will respond to anything and everything - even to tell people that I'm not answering a question - and I'm fighting multiple fronts in this thread, I'm not deflecting anything at all.In post 564, popopopopopopo wrote:So GL OMGUSd me and started a counter wagon to deflect attention and his partner cat hopped on innocuously a couple votes in?
Sometimes its just that easy
bad reasons for townreading somebodyIn post 601, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well first of all, i think it’s town to say he’s doing it for reactions. He also included a reads list afterwards which proves that point. Also i’m getting a distinct feel of his town meta from recent posts. As scum he would probably lurk hard and only pop in to say some irrelevant stuff or try to fake a different progression when he started being suspected/wagoned.
I thought your push on me was awful and fake. The RVS vote and activity points were minor footnotes in comparison to that.In post 632, GuiltyLion wrote:I generally don't believe there's a case on me worthy of votes at this point, I've started playing and engaging with the game so the 'activity' tell is out and I've also already shown Norway's RVS reasoning doesn't hold up.
lolIn post 607, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Only if i see a damn good case for why another player is scum and why GL cannot be scum with them.In post 606, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Can I get you to reconsider that slot?
which of my posts have been shit? Especially outside of posts where I'm calling you scum?In post 608, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Inflated post counts only are good for towntelling if they have substance. I think a lot of GL’s posts have been shit, so the ratio between good vs meaningless posts from GL is still too high for me to reconsider based on your point.
What specifically do you think was fake about it? I'm pretty sure I can show you many times I've made similar cases as town, dissecting the way people phrase things, like across several years of metaIn post 635, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I thought your push on me was awful and fake.
298In post 637, GuiltyLion wrote:which of my posts have been shit?
What is actually shit about these posts? I like all of them
Yeah bc he literally just hops on a mislynch at the L-3 middle spot and shades me afterwards, then deflects all blame by saying "I'm sheeping Norway for tHe ReAcTiOnS!!"In post 639, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You were TR Popopo in 304, then change your mind when he votes you. Basic OMGUS.
The point of this question wasn't for you to just mindlessly list posts, it was for you to show an actual thought process behind your tunnel
wait what the hell? Me directly answering Quick's question about "link your past town and scum games" is shit posting?In post 639, NorwegianboyEE wrote:374, 376 and 377. Focusing on a minor point and acting as if this disproves the fact that your entire push was bad and based upon nitpicking shit like: "You sound more formal in this one single post" as a reason to scumread me.
No, i never claimed that. It was like a bonus point i brought up as an afterthought. But you treated it like if was the very foundation of my scumread on you.In post 643, GuiltyLion wrote:also it's funny how the RVS thing is now a "minor point" when that was initially like a foundational cornerstone of why you thought I was scum, to the point that you were bragging about how you "crumbed" it.
In post 16, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Early scumread on your slot already. I always vote my best buds when i’m scum to "fit in". You’re clearly trying to mask your deep affections for you with this deceivery and i shall not stand for it.
In post 334, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GuiltyLion starts game off with RVS vote and then keeps it up and justifies it with weak shit to avoid actually having to pretend solving. Ez scum in the bag.
outside of this, the only other main point you have is that you didn't like my 302. Whoop-de-fuckin doo. I've made cases or reads on every other slot in the game and have clearly demonstrated that I'm legit solving by now, and the best you've come up with is to constantly throw shade at me, even to the point of childish name-calling, and pretend like your scumread is so axiomatically strong that it shapes how you view every other single slot. it's trash play Norway and it makes it hard for me not to think that I was right and you feel the need to discredit everything I do in order to survive.In post 347, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GL's first post actually pinged me hard, but i held back on commenting it until i'd seen what he would be up to. Since i've clearly seen his bad intentions by now there's no point concealing it.
Making a "RVS" vote like that on a random familiar slot and then leaving without doing any solving is an archtypical scum entrance i've seen a couple times by this point. Especially on my home forum. I can't explain it well. But if GL flips scum i'm going to celebrate my ability to see right through shit like that.
And questioning what "the point" of my posts were, etc...In post 302, GuiltyLion wrote:"I implore you to abandon this push"? Norway I don't remember you ever speaking so awkwardly formally like this in our games together?