If you go to my first vote. Right under it Jackson asking if I meant to vote PP (I'm still confused by that) and so it wasn't counted in the VC. Hence the second vote.In post 1174, superbowl9 wrote:Also TM I am still really confused why you voted Marashu 3 posts in a row (also then unvote next post lol). And can you confirm that you are following the hider plan?
The third was more of a joke/reaction test. I've seen fake hammers done in games (one quite poorly that BM should know) and I thought that was a non-disastrous time to give it a shot. I did think I pulled a pretty genuine townie reaction from Word with it. But read it over and tell me what you think, please.
I will do as I am ordered. Though I still feel the least good about BM of those in the town block. So, I'd kind of rather someone else do the order. But since no one else has a problem. I can follow a very simple list yes indeedy.
Yeah, but I fell into that bad play hook line and sinker. So I know a town player can go down that rabbit hole, and I can't just come out the other side and be like 'wow Nash, bad idea time to die.' Y'know? Also, someone has said before that this feels like a game where the scum has given up which maybe? But don't scum have an actually higher chance to win losing a member day 1 (depending on set up), seriously correct me if I'm wrong but I swear I've read that. Since it makes it much harder to get an accurate group read. Therefore I could see them being energized for day 2. Especially if it was bussing. This is also when you point to Nash seeming demotivated, we both have very similar EOD 1 and day 2s. Too me it instead feels like I'm being washed away by a town block I don't fully trust and have no clue how to stop the tide. So I can imagine that being demotivating for town Nash too. But I also have a history of trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with reads like this, and everything I've said at DM has literally not been worthy of comment by anyone in this game. I don't know if this addressed or cleared up anything, but that's where I'm at.In post 1173, superbowl9 wrote:In post 1167, Tuxedo Mask wrote:
I at least understood where Nash was coming from end of Day 1.
What???? Nash's play at the end of D1 is policy elimable. Now's a great time to put out more detail about why I prefer them to PP.
I've also got one more tinfoily thing about BM but I've misread his intentions before, and my theory feels mean. So I haven't shared it.
In the end, this came off more like a rant, but it is late and I don't know how to express myself better.
