I think this whole post is revisionist history upon needing to fabricate an explanation for that post days laterIn post 2502, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Anyway this theory died as soon as DonC was willing to lynch Klick on D2.
- Dumber
I think this whole post is revisionist history upon needing to fabricate an explanation for that post days laterIn post 2502, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Anyway this theory died as soon as DonC was willing to lynch Klick on D2.
But our whole gameplan *(per your explanation for why we wanted klick first out yesterday) is to win a 1v1 against you todayIn post 2504, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I already explain in my post why you didn't come out guns blazing for me today. If you were town you would've definitely come out eager to scrap and brawl but instead it's been quite dull. You don't want to hit me too hard and make me look good tomorrow after you flip scum today.In post 2497, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Yes, we did feel regret, but saying that should lead to us coming out "guns blazing" is wrong. If anything, if we were planning to set up a Pooky 1v1 for today... isn't it much more likely that we'd have some ammo to attack you with entering today?
Not reallyIn post 2508, Wug wrote:does n1 on-coalition kill make sense if both maf are in the coalition?
This wasnt' your narrative at daystart though.In post 2510, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't think you intended to actually derail the wagon - you wanted to put up a strong defense of Pooky-Town so that you'd have something to use against Klick - however you pushed a little too hard and ending up completely trainwrecking the wagon - at that point you couldn't turn back so you decided the heck with it I can always just flip this back on Pooky on D3 when Klick flips town - that'd be 2 MLs Pooky is on and he'd be a sitting duck for me to push out in LYLO.
Again, this doesn't actually take into account the fact that our position in the gamestate would be wrecked upon a klick!townflip, when we could have just avoided all of this by supporting your mislynch in the first place.In post 2514, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Of course you committed to the defense of me whole-heartedly - the more strongly you defend me - the better you look on D3 when I flip town on D2 lynch - setting you up for the 1v1 with Klick perfectly. If you had put forth just a half-hearted defense of me, it would've looked like scum having info and posturing for D3 and you would've had a much arder time vs Klick on D3 1v1 LyLo.
You probably didn't expect to actually succeed in derailing the wagon on D2
I don't remember any instance yesterday where you could've been wagonedIn post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Uhhhhh this could have gone sooooooo badly for scum!us, and backfired awfully. It almost did, we were initially scum-read for doing so, and were in the hot seat for a bit there. We coudl have just ... avoided all of that by saying 'oh yeah pooky is obvscum lol' and vote you.
In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Like we could have taken the easy route so so so easily. Like I don't get why we'd go out of the way to make our position in the game more precarious when we could have just taken the easy mislynch and then had the 1v1 today.
How are you in a worse position now ?In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:We're obviously, undoubtedly, in a worse position right now, upon the mislynch, than we would have been if we would had just ridden the mislynch to the 1b1 today. Like we (unfortunately) burned all towncred yesterday ... for what exactly? It didn't make today any easier
Again town-cred is relative - regardless of any town-cred you lose with the Klick-townflip - my credibility is still worse than yours.In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Again, this is failing to take into account the consequences/reevaluations/gamestate post klick!townflip. Our credit is shot. You're describing this to me significantly easier than it actually is, and the scum motivation you're attributing to us evaporates in that context
This is farcically incorrect on its face, how is it an uphill battle for you? Aldus/Wug both voted for me in D2 - do you think Klick flipping town will make them change their mind on my guilt? Regardless of which one is your scumbuddy - you only need to convince the other person to vote me and you have a packaged win right there - you don't even have to push hard - you just have to make the townie not change his mind. Also DC has voted for me on both D1 and D2 - so you just have to get him to vote me once and have your scumbuddy pounce.In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Like this is a awful uphill battle that could have been avoided by taking the easy mislynch yesterday.
because 1v1 Klick is much harder for you today than 1v1 Pooky - Pooky is someone suspected by 5/7 players on D2 and you just need 1 vote from 1 of them to win the game today.In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Like, if scum!us went town!pooky first: easy mislynch yesterday on pooky, one hard-ish mislynch today on klick
vs: if scum!us went town!klick first: redivert everyone off of the easy mislynch, burn all our cred upon the townflip, and look like idiots today when we're forced to go back to the position we hsould have taken yesterday. Just, like, why?
I'm just going off what your other head said:In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:You're acting like we read nothing and had no context for the game, and just barged in here with a preconceived narrative that we were going to push regardless, which isn't true.
We both skimmed bits and parts of teh game upon repping in, and my other head actually read through large portions of day1. We had *some* of the context, albeit all of it, and what we had seen from that point seemed to point to scum!klick
In post 2490, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Of course, that is if I find a solid lead - there's a lot in D1 I haven't read, so maybe I will there.
Well there's 2 of you and you've had since Thursday when Klick was revealed as a townie so I don't think it's unfair to say that it hasn't been a great priority for you.In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:- I was busy IRL and wasn't around literally until now, so assigning motivations or emotions to me when I clearly have not been here is just a bit gross
I explained why you didn't come out swinging in my post - you didn't want the fight to get too real because it creates separation between us - if I win this 1v1 with you, you want me to look like possibly your scumbuddy so I'm a viable lynch-candidate on D4. If the battle between us gets to fierce and I end up looking like lock-town after you flip scum, then we have 2 universally townread players in Pooky/DC and you can only kill one of us leaving an endgame of Pooky or DC town vs Wug - Aldus and you're worried that Aldus-scum doesn't win that 1v1 vs Wug.In post 2522, Dumb and Dumber wrote:- this doesn't match the narrative you're pushing in the top of this post - if our evil!plan is to come in and push you today after forcing through the mislynch on town!klick, we should have been better prepared, no? We had all of day2 and the night to plan this out. Our whole plan for the game was contingent on this given our actions yesterday. And despite that, we just - don't act upon it today? How does that make sense as a scum action here given teh narrative you're pushing today?
It's a fallback option for you if you lose the 1v1 with me - though now that I've called attention to it I expect you and your other head will step up big time in the posting and make this a real fight to the death.In post 2526, Dumb and Dumber wrote:But our whole gameplan *(per your explanation for why we wanted klick first out yesterday) is to win a 1v1 against you today
You can't simultaneously argue we went for Klick yesterday to set up a mislynch on you today to win while also arguing we we're setting ourselves up to take the fall today so that you're tomorrow's mislynch bait
That doesn't make sense. Like your narrative has shifted to basically saying we're currently trying to set you up to be 3way lylo's mislynch but that doesn't explain what we were trying to do yesterday with Klick
You did not believe you had the ability to derail the wagon because it had 2 votes on it and 3 people signalling intent to vote - 5 votes out of 4 needed for a lynch.In post 2528, Dumb and Dumber wrote:This wasnt' your narrative at daystart though.
Your explanation for what we've been doing has shifted (and has, imo, become improbable)
Again, Klick-townflip hits me and you equally hard - it's a relative wash. However you still get to 1v1 against somebody who the entire town suspected on D2.In post 2529, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Again, this doesn't actually take into account the fact that our position in the gamestate would be wrecked upon a klick!townflip, when we could have just avoided all of this by supporting your mislynch in the first place.
Like you're concocting elaborate plans to explain scum!us's positioning, but failing to explain why we don't just take the easy route. Like what you're saying is technically possible, sure. Is it actually probable though?
I wish I had a nightkill to get rid of the person who wants me evicted, I could just shoot aldus and claim I'm being framed.In post 2520, Dumb and Dumber wrote:I think we were framed with that kill
(And I'd also have to say that as either alignment, so eh take that with a grain of salt)
this makes senseIn post 2511, Alduskkel wrote:It's a pretty bold play, but if they expected Pooky to get eliminated Day 2 then it sort of makes sense to sell the idea of 1 off, 1 on.In post 2508, Wug wrote:does n1 on-coalition kill make sense if both maf are in the coalition?