In post 78, davesaz wrote: In post 75, Hayasaka wrote: In post 62, davesaz wrote:Mixed feelings on
58. Seems intended to make progress, but not terribly inspiring.
Very mixed feelings on
60. That's a lot of explanation. Being clear, or appearing to be clear?
I don't particularly like this post from Davesaz he is hedging a ton in this post.
I think either of these could be described as scum indicative but he is choosing not to for no real reason.
Because you hide behind the anonymity of an alt I don't know if you know me or not.
Accuracy is important in this game. Anyone who has seen me play knows I approach every early game this way.
Notscience can have a short pass on this since it has almost certainly been years since we have played.
In general I would consider myself to a similar player my last game which was on this account post lynch I ended up declaring exactly 2 reads. I understand why one would hedge as town I do it literally all game.
But I think how you chose to do it was scummy and my explanation failed to capture how I felt. When town hedge they leave things open. "X is scummy but what if Y" kind of ideas. So you would say my post is super scummy but you can see town playing like that.
So town hedge but they leave discussion open to say "why do you think that". But the post I quoted basically closes that off. It's just straight hedging to state thoughts without anyone being able to claim you actually have any down the line I guess?