Your avatar is a different color.In post 71, Servant Beast wrote:Hey guys, checking in. Skimming and trying to get used to reading messages with the avatars all looking the same.
I can confirm I have a similar ability to what several people have claimed so I think that is all null then right?
Scum love doing this shit because it always gets them town read.In post 74, Servant Foreigner wrote:I don't town read Berserker at all.
Which makes this entire situation feel like utter shit from my POV.
I think this is the easiest "aggro" push you can make.
I think aggro pushes like this are more likely to come from scum then town.
It's a nice start to have a townread before page 4.In post 68, Servant Archer wrote:spicy take broIn post 67, Servant Alter Ego wrote:I like this post.
And the OMGUS to top it off, aided by a "aggressive players are scummy"!In post 74, Servant Foreigner wrote:I don't town read Berserker at all.
Which makes this entire situation feel like utter shit from my POV.
I think this is the easiest "aggro" push you can make.
I think aggro pushes like this are more likely to come from scum then town.
I would be fine with making a strong town voice master. First of all, they will be guaranteed to drive 3 hangs which can hopefully help snowball this game. Also, there's probably going to exist protective roles anyways, so they could save whoever we end up choosing.In post 25, Servant Foreigner wrote:To some degree we don't want to confirm someone we think is town as town? They get a jacked role pm but will just end up being shot which results in us losing a strong town read and the entire benefit of this vote.
How does that statement fall apart in an anonymous game.In post 80, Servant Berserker wrote:And the OMGUS to top it off, aided by a "aggressive players are scummy"!
In an anonymous game.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm :Thinking:
Yawn. So what, this is the setup?In post 76, Servant Foreigner wrote:Scum love doing this shit because it always gets them town read.In post 74, Servant Foreigner wrote:I don't town read Berserker at all.
Which makes this entire situation feel like utter shit from my POV.
I think this is the easiest "aggro" push you can make.
I think aggro pushes like this are more likely to come from scum then town.
Berserker is going to back off in 20 pages, further getting more town cred.
It's actual garbage that I've seen 100 times and town has literally never successfully adapted to it.
Seemed like busywork to me.In post 78, Servant Alter Ego wrote:It's a nice start to have a townread before page 4.
I care more about scum not having whatever powerups they'd get than losing one strong town player.In post 81, Servant Archer wrote:I would be fine with making a strong town voice master. First of all, they will be guaranteed to drive 3 hangs which can hopefully help snowball this game. Also, there's probably going to exist protective roles anyways, so they could save whoever we end up choosing.In post 25, Servant Foreigner wrote:To some degree we don't want to confirm someone we think is town as town? They get a jacked role pm but will just end up being shot which results in us losing a strong town read and the entire benefit of this vote.
It's that you're making it in an anonymous game as a generic defense. No one can go "no that's not true" because yes, some scum are aggro. Plenty more aren't. No one has meta, no one can "disprove" your statement...In post 82, Servant Foreigner wrote:How does that statement fall apart in an anonymous game.In post 80, Servant Berserker wrote:And the OMGUS to top it off, aided by a "aggressive players are scummy"!
In an anonymous game.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm :Thinking:
I am saying scum like to go aggro.
Watch a wagon form.
Then back up and get 2 cred in 2 different forms.
You're saying what you can, it's garbage, and it's going to work out for you.
Good job I guess.
Town and scum both had strong reason to go after the master upgrade from the start, especially before we learned it's ubiquitous. I think how to act on that is more of a personality thing than an alignment thing.In post 79, Servant Lancer wrote:Berserker trying to strongarm the master vote out of the gate doesn't give me good feelings either.
It's not about my play, it is about their statement being completely neutral.In post 83, Servant Lancer wrote:What does your play have to do with this game being anon?
You said I missed posts in the thread, yes I did.In post 84, Servant Berserker wrote:Yawn. So what, this is the setup?
You'll attack the general concept of aggressiveness instead of addressing anything I've actually posted.
And then make casual claims about what may happen in the future to shape expectations?
What part of what you are doing here is town trying to read people?
This reads more like scum trying to control narratives?
ok but a couple other people had the same idea so why single out berserkerIn post 79, Servant Lancer wrote:Berserker trying to strongarm the master vote out of the gate doesn't give me good feelings either.
I agree that no one should read me above neutral for wanting the Master vote.In post 92, Servant Alter Ego wrote:Town and scum both had strong reason to go after the master upgrade from the start, especially before we learned it's ubiquitous. I think how to act on that is more of a personality thing than an alignment thing.In post 79, Servant Lancer wrote:Berserker trying to strongarm the master vote out of the gate doesn't give me good feelings either.
If someone can manage to read this and vote me after.In post 90, Servant Berserker wrote:It's that you're making it in an anonymous game as a generic defense. No one can go "no that's not true" because yes, some scum are aggro. Plenty more aren't. No one has meta, no one can "disprove" your statement...
but your statement also has no value. Just as many town are aggro too.
And now you're speaking from a perspective of "knowing" I'm scum.
This is not real outrage. Nothing you have said as of so far reads as real. It reads as trying to take advantage of and deflect a situation by creating a fight.
