Well the argument is wrong, but i think it isn't dishonest or anything so your read on me doesn't matterIn post 144, NicCage wrote:What do you think about my read on you? Does it have any bearing on your read on me?
could you elaborate on this?In post 145, PlusJOYED wrote: Wasn't a fan of NicCage entrance and focus on what scum do vs what town do.
thing is, while i don't think you're question there was scummy in isolation, it's the lack of going out and interacting with people that i don't like, and so you're just sitting there making remarks about someone's posting style, and reacting to people voting you. i don't see any sign that you actually want to find the scum.In post 119, Gypyx wrote:Ok so thomas is making an enormous fuss about me asking about me asking questions about someone's meta, which like, is not AI in any way
Like, sure thomas's case is wordy, but he repeats his points a lot, to compensate for the lack of content in it
He's even getting to the point of not understeanding the obvious formulation of my post, which has got to be the biggest tunnel i have ever seen of simply just deliberate
And also, to anyone who's interested i have already asked open questions about someone's meta before, and i am the kind of person to forget what questions i asked / accidentally make up others
Huh, it's kinda the opposite of what you've said though, like, i'm the one starting the conversations with peoples, where have i exactly been reacting to being voted by peoples?In post 158, SKYEscrapers wrote:thing is, while i don't think you're question there was scummy in isolation, it's the lack of going out and interacting with people that i don't like, and so you're just sitting there making remarks about someone's posting style, and reacting to people voting you. i don't see any sign that you actually want to find the scum.In post 119, Gypyx wrote:Ok so thomas is making an enormous fuss about me asking about me asking questions about someone's meta, which like, is not AI in any way
Like, sure thomas's case is wordy, but he repeats his points a lot, to compensate for the lack of content in it
He's even getting to the point of not understeanding the obvious formulation of my post, which has got to be the biggest tunnel i have ever seen of simply just deliberate
And also, to anyone who's interested i have already asked open questions about someone's meta before, and i am the kind of person to forget what questions i asked / accidentally make up others
really townreading plusjoyed from this openingIn post 32, PlusJOYED wrote:this kinda pings my gut though I have trouble explaining whyIn post 25, SKYEscrapers wrote:Hey mastina!
Honestly, this post is just to claim the pagetop, but what part of Tris' post is so Alien to you? Why do you think it is scum?
Perhaps you'll be able to rrad me better at least
- Ari
ehhhh
VOTE: skye
entire interaction pings me as insanely awkward but i think i'm feeling town vibes from DT and i'll sheep mastina on skye because i haven't played with ari in far too longIn post 42, DoubtingThomas wrote:like what kind of posts is this?In post 39, SKYEscrapers wrote:well, is that your response?In post 33, DoubtingThomas wrote:Not sure if it's real thought to... scum read me for you voting me before i even posted? How did you expect me to respond?In post 22, SKYEscrapers wrote:"i'm scumreading you"In post 20, DoubtingThomas wrote:i dont think the two posts that vote me are really scum reading me. do you? why?
- tris
"Oh! You are voting me before I even posted? Why are you scum reading me?"
Doesn't make sense, right?
VOTE: skye
tris
no it's actually my selfie
????????????
don't like this at allIn post 62, NicCage wrote:Who should I vote for?
i think mastina is town here and her skye townread feels well thought out hereIn post 67, mastina wrote:Because tris making that post is probably scum, but Ari making that post is far more likely to be a town-Aristophanes due to Aristophanes being Aristophanes.In post 65, PlusJOYED wrote:why is town!ari more likely to make that post than tris?
You can't expect an action to universally always be scummy or always be townie with 100% accuracy and not take into account specific players. An action that might be generically in-general scummy can be a lock-scumtell for some players or a town indicator for other players even if in general it's scummy; an action that might generically in-general be townie can be a locktown level of town in some players...but also a dead giveaway that some players are actually scum.
25 is a post that, in general, generically speaking, I'd consider to be a scummy post to make.
From tris, I'd go one step further and say it's even a lockscum post.
But from Aristophanes, knowing him as a player, it's actually the opposite, a post that for him, indicates he's more likely to be town.
please don'tIn post 76, SKYEscrapers wrote:because gypyx didn't like the way i was signing my posts, i am now signing them with
mew
this separation, while i don't agree at all with it and i don't think trying to do that is productive or accurate, gives me town pings from DTIn post 95, DoubtingThomas wrote:1 scum in akarin/gypxy/mastinaIn post 91, Akarin wrote:That's what they all say *sniffle*In post 89, NicCage wrote: Uh it's not you, it's me.
Should I be voting for this DoubtingThomas character?
And it depends on how much you like early Day 1 Dastardly Deed -1 (DD-1?)
DT is my top scumread right now, but...
It's 5 to Perform a Dastardly Deed
I think it’s currently at
DT (3): Akarin, Gypyx, Mastina
gypyx (2): DT, SKYE
SKYE (1): PlusJOYED
NicCage (1): Nona
Not Voting: (2): Dunn, NicCage
For future reference, Page 2 DT vs. SKYE peak wagons were:
DT (3): Akarin, SKYE, Gypyx
SKYE (3): PlusJOYED, Mastina, DT
and 1 in skye/plustjoyed/nona/dunn/niccage i think
dunn and niccage not voting at this point is an alright look
gut town on gypyx here from this attackIn post 119, Gypyx wrote:Ok so thomas is making an enormous fuss about me asking about me asking questions about someone's meta, which like, is not AI in any way
Like, sure thomas's case is wordy, but he repeats his points a lot, to compensate for the lack of content in it
He's even getting to the point of not understeanding the obvious formulation of my post, which has got to be the biggest tunnel i have ever seen of simply just deliberate
And also, to anyone who's interested i have already asked open questions about someone's meta before, and i am the kind of person to forget what questions i asked / accidentally make up others
hard agree with thisIn post 123, mastina wrote:(I legit get strong scum-scum vibes from NicCage-Dunnstral's interactions.)In post 83, NicCage wrote:I don’t know yet. If someone else gave you a good read, wouldn’t you follow it?In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:So when I asked you why you asked the question earlier, what are you trying to do? Are you trying to sheep someone, or trying to question someone, or trying to get into the game, or whatIn post 72, NicCage wrote:Why should I?
i think gypyx gives off that kind of vibe in general and i'd be inclined to believe that he's the most mislynch-baity out of the threeIn post 145, PlusJOYED wrote:I agree there is most likely at least 1 scum in there. I'm not townreading any of them and they give off a bit of scum energy. Of the 3 I'd say gypx is probably a good place to go. Imo he's most likely red.
Wasn't a fan of NicCage entrance and focus on what scum do vs what town do.
Gypx has been doubtful of most posts; he's been critiquing more than he puts out which is bad sign.
Doubting seems overconfident but the rest of his stuff seems fine.
I think NicCage will be more likely to provide good insight if he's town than Gypyx being town. Lets go Gypx
VOTE: Gypyx
Give me 5 good reasons whyIn post 165, TheGoldenParadox wrote:don't like this at allIn post 62, NicCage wrote:Who should I vote for?
yeah this seems like the best slot to lim todayIn post 166, NicCage wrote:Give me 5 good reasons whyIn post 165, TheGoldenParadox wrote:don't like this at allIn post 62, NicCage wrote:Who should I vote for?
What makes you say so?In post 165, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hard agree with this
"most likely at least 1" ... is confusing to follow. can you clarify?In post 145, PlusJOYED wrote:I agree there is most likely at least 1 scum in there. I'm not townreading any of them and they give off a bit of scum energy. Of the 3 I'd say gypx is probably a good place to go. Imo he's most likely red.
Wasn't a fan of NicCage entrance and focus on what scum do vs what town do.
Gypx has been doubtful of most posts; he's been critiquing more than he puts out which is bad sign.
Doubting seems overconfident but the rest of his stuff seems fine.
I think NicCage will be more likely to provide good insight if he's town than Gypyx being town. Lets go Gypx
VOTE: Gypyx
no because you voted me before i even posted and then said i am scummy for not addressing a vote that happened when i didnt even post yet. that can't be a real scum read.In post 159, SKYEscrapers wrote:mew
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@thomasdid you ever think i was serious when i was voting you in RVS? What was your thought process about me then?
mew
hmm so you vote with me agreeing independently that gypyx is scummy, gypyx doesn't do much town indicative things but come to the conclusion that my push on gypyx is a scummy push?In post 161, SKYEscrapers wrote:actually, VOTE: thomas
please answer 159
i don't like the way you've pushed on gypyx. while there's truth in there, you exaggerate how big a deal that question from gypyx is.
and also, ari pointed out 136, which is a bad post
