With a role like mine I anticipate dying quickly.In post 871, Nono wrote:I wanna put in faiths maths is smart because you have to be smart to do maths,, so scum is a compliment kek xD
just don’t underestimate,, cockiness is bad, y’all
Sam was the one who asked about pages.In post 873, Nono wrote:what’s the case
rampage,, here is the questionIn post 443, Nono wrote:I’m mod confirmed too,, just trust xDIn post 433, TemporalLich wrote:yeah you'll have to trust albert on that one but 185 is meant to back up his role claim.In post 442, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're just gonna take him at his word that he cant die?
I rather make sure.what’s the plan?
“Doubting,” i get it,, the theory is you fake claim a n0 investigative, pick a random target thinking “chances are, this is town because I am scum heehee xD” but then got caught, ok,, now why fake claim investigative when you’re vig because you’re more likely to die,, doesn’t make sense!
everyone is scummy kek
What makes you think that; how does it work?In post 849, MathBlade wrote:The post was preplanned
meta is trashIn post 865, TemporalLich wrote:The best way I can describe DGB's ISO is with my small atom of experience DGB's ISO feels like it isn't at all playing to DGB's meta... yet I know nothing about DGB's meta
This was her very first post. Most people on entry do a joke or bait a reaction or vote someone.In post 72, samantha97 wrote:should we share which page(s) we sent for roles?
Not a simple cut and paste error?In post 876, MathBlade wrote:Sam was the one who asked about pages.In post 873, Nono wrote:what’s the case
Then later she posts her own.
This means she’d be prepared for the eventuality that she would have to share what page. It’s not a “rapid fire” mistake. She planned to respond with only page 63. It makes it very unlikely to be a mistake.
She said she hand built the url that lead to the page. So it’s either A> She didn’t double check her work despite laser focus on mechanics and not knowing how the page system works despite wanting everyone’s pagesIn post 886, DrippingGoofball wrote:Not a simple cut and paste error?In post 876, MathBlade wrote:Sam was the one who asked about pages.In post 873, Nono wrote:what’s the case
Then later she posts her own.
This means she’d be prepared for the eventuality that she would have to share what page. It’s not a “rapid fire” mistake. She planned to respond with only page 63. It makes it very unlikely to be a mistake.
OH NO SOMEONE IS TRYING TO ADVANCE THE GAME INSTEAD OF DOING RVS. WAHHHH.In post 885, MathBlade wrote:This was her very first post. Most people on entry do a joke or bait a reaction or vote someone.In post 72, samantha97 wrote:should we share which page(s) we sent for roles?
Her entry disregards that and immediately focuses on mechanics. It doesn’t give anything and lets her sit back.
She gave little/no reads depending upon interpretation and spent a lot of time compiling the who posted what numbers list. She’s been laser focused on the mechanics to the exclusion of much all else that is a mark of devotion. It means she’s more focused on mechanics than poking about reads. Becomes iioa.
That actually doesn’t advance the game. It’s numbers. If I made up numbers of pages it doesn’t tell you anything about me. Those pages could just be omitted from the setup. It’s a post designed to look helpful but isn’t.In post 888, Tayl0r Swift wrote:OH NO SOMEONE IS TRYING TO ADVANCE THE GAME INSTEAD OF DOING RVS. WAHHHH.In post 885, MathBlade wrote:This was her very first post. Most people on entry do a joke or bait a reaction or vote someone.In post 72, samantha97 wrote:should we share which page(s) we sent for roles?
Her entry disregards that and immediately focuses on mechanics. It doesn’t give anything and lets her sit back.
She gave little/no reads depending upon interpretation and spent a lot of time compiling the who posted what numbers list. She’s been laser focused on the mechanics to the exclusion of much all else that is a mark of devotion. It means she’s more focused on mechanics than poking about reads. Becomes iioa.
math wagon anyone? or we've already been down this road and math softed some PR that i still dont get.
what character?In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.
Out of character is a phrase. It means unexpected for the person.In post 891, Tayl0r Swift wrote:what character?In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.
but youve only seen me play as scum lolIn post 892, MathBlade wrote:Out of character is a phrase. It means unexpected for the person.In post 891, Tayl0r Swift wrote:what character?In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.
I haven’t seen you with that kind of sarcasm/extremeness. It’s very off putting and odd.
Yes this is true, but in general people have a range. When a person deviates there’s a trigger point. I’ve been saying Sam is scum for a while now. Other players have agreed with the theory mentioned before. Yet here you make an extreme reaction. It’s not natural. It’s artificial.In post 893, Tayl0r Swift wrote:but youve only seen me play as scum lolIn post 892, MathBlade wrote:Out of character is a phrase. It means unexpected for the person.In post 891, Tayl0r Swift wrote:what character?In post 890, MathBlade wrote:I am back to Vig Taylor category. This push doesn’t make sense. It’s too hyperbolic and out of character.
I haven’t seen you with that kind of sarcasm/extremeness. It’s very off putting and odd.
silly,, that's not an answer, why loverize himIn post 882, Albert B. Rampage wrote:My plan was to loverize him
Why do people make the stupid argument I push low hanging fruit?In post 897, Nono wrote:maths pushing me feels,, like
sometimes sees me here and feels bad,, when i'm gone, wants to push cuz i'm lhf and delicious bait xD
i don't get the case xD logic is dead in this game,, ain't for me