I didn't say town should ignore odd behavior early. Odd behavior is why I am pushing Rannygazoo. In fact, my approach is the opposite. Every weak thing should be considered to get the game going.In post 71, Battle Mage wrote:I don't agree with your inference that town should ignore odd behaviour early in the game on the basis "everything is weak...it gets players invested", and it's an odd line to take given your earlier claim you didnt want to prolong the RVS. Are you really suggesting it was unreasonable for me to vote for Ranny based on my rationale? If so, I'd be grateful if you could set that out more clearly.In post 55, Titus wrote:Why not? It's early and everything is weak. If it gets players invested, we can get started. Now if such a basis persisted with nothing more, that's scummy. We're at the point where weak evidence is better than none.In post 51, Battle Mage wrote:I also didn't really understand the attempt to sort you so early based on a 1-game meta and a couple of empty posts.
P.S. ben is town.
On Ben, tell me how confident you are that he is town, and why?
Given your basic lack of reading comprehension, I can be pretty sure you are town.
Ben is town because his angle feels pure in how he's pushing me. I can see his thought process clearly.
P.S. I still want to know why you indulged Rannygazoo's post 41 with your post 48. Rannygazoo's 41 is a particularly bad post. So is his attempt to call me a troll.