I posted...In post 1124, SirCakez wrote:if VP disappears here now that he's off the hot seat it will look pretty bad
*Checks notes*
... yesterday.
I posted...In post 1124, SirCakez wrote:if VP disappears here now that he's off the hot seat it will look pretty bad
Question, am I the only one who has never played with her before?In post 1082, SirCakez wrote:I'd like to elim in this today I think Noraa's wagon was scum infested and taking advantage of her known predisposition to get emotional
Agreed. I'd almost say this is a similar format to The Weakest Link where we should plan out the challenges.In post 1088, SirCakez wrote:i'm not challenging anyone rn this thread needs to breathe now that we're finally out of that bs
My read shifted hard on him towards the end of yesterday. I wouldn't mind seeing he and Pooky up again.In post 1101, AGar wrote:GE is still scum y'all.
I worked 8 days straight, had one day off (Sunday), and am back at it as of Monday till, at least, Saturday. I've been catching up and reading where I can and not actually here in real time, so I can see why you'd feel this way.In post 1103, xRECKONERx wrote:Her catchup posts felt a lot like cheering from the sidelines and the way she was all "rah rah Reck makes good points" just *feels* like scum trying to get into my blindspot but it has been quite a hot minute since I've played with her so it could be genuine which is why I haven't really acted on it
It is a pretty scummy take, though, and an easy way to shirk any responsibility for yesterday.In post 1105, notscience wrote:agar I literally was saying for days it was four town. Several people scum read me for it.
I'd take a detailed explanation of this. Your read shifted hard, how and why? Before or after the noraa flip? Sounds like before.In post 1127, Starbuck wrote:My read shifted hard on him towards the end of yesterday. I wouldn't mind seeing he and Pooky up again.
For some reason, I had thought you refrained from placing a vote at all. I was mistaken as I just went back to look at the final vote count.In post 1128, notscience wrote:Show me where I’m shirking responsibility for it and not chastising Pooky.
Definitely before and starting around the time when I finished my catch up. At the beginning of catching up, when I came in the game and read through the atrocious back and forth between he and Noraa, I was townreading him. I could empathize with a lot of what he was saying, especially in the face of someone who was being out of this world unreasonable. It's all laid out in 522.In post 1129, VP Baltar wrote:I'd take a detailed explanation of this. Your read shifted hard, how and why? Before or after the noraa flip? Sounds like before.In post 1127, Starbuck wrote:My read shifted hard on him towards the end of yesterday. I wouldn't mind seeing he and Pooky up again.
That things seemed to get blown from a molehill into a mountain.In post 522, Starbuck wrote:It's interesting because there's a Gamma/Noraa 1v1 and a Pooky/Baltar 1v1 happening. I feel like I've sorted the first, but I'm not sure about the 2nd.
I'm not sure what I've done to be talked to like that, but I don't do anything for folks who are rude to me.In post 667, Gamma Emerald wrote:it's not negotiable that I won't look favorably on you if you fail to deliver before this bubble bursts
i thought people were tired of me posting shit and wanted me to shut up tbhIn post 1126, VP Baltar wrote:Also, why say that about me, but not pooky, who I don't think has even posted any content this phase?
notice the key word "if"In post 1125, VP Baltar wrote:I posted...In post 1124, SirCakez wrote:if VP disappears here now that he's off the hot seat it will look pretty bad
*Checks notes*
... yesterday.
you just came to mind first because I felt like Pooky brought a ton of attention upon himself already while you were thrust into itIn post 1126, VP Baltar wrote:Also, why say that about me, but not pooky, who I don't think has even posted any content this phase?
Today is "saying things that don't need to be said" day or what?In post 1138, SirCakez wrote:notice the key word "if"
I'm sorry hwat?In post 1122, notscience wrote:@Agar- anti town more likely comes from town for Pooky
What benefit do you see to scum angling to push a four-town mindset if there's a scumbag in there?In post 1123, SirCakez wrote:the four town argument I think is wrongIn post 1121, notscience wrote:...In post 1119, SirCakez wrote:mmm I don't think soIn post 1105, notscience wrote:agar I literally was saying for days it was four town. Several people scum read me for it.
ANd at first I was frustrated I had no time to think. Then i started towmreadimg all of them and got annoyed
Go on?
Imagine misreading the room this bad.In post 1137, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i thought people were tired of me posting shit and wanted me to shut up tbhIn post 1126, VP Baltar wrote:Also, why say that about me, but not pooky, who I don't think has even posted any content this phase?
Chastising Pooky about his play isn't not shirking responsibility though. You did fuckall to try and at least move the town towards the player you felt was acting most detrimental, if you truly feel all four in the pool were town, and you've hid behind "Well like three of you would've for sure shot me down because I townread two players because of meta" which is a charmin level defense for not making any real attempt to even sell anyone on Pookie.In post 1128, notscience wrote:Show me where I’m shirking responsibility for it and not chastising Pooky.
i had a strange gut feelingIn post 1141, VP Baltar wrote:Today is "saying things that don't need to be said" day or what?In post 1138, SirCakez wrote:notice the key word "if"
Why would you think I'm going to disappear?
this seems really obvious no?In post 1142, AGar wrote:What benefit do you see to scum angling to push a four-town mindset if there's a scumbag in there?
Nah.In post 1143, xRECKONERx wrote:agar are you scum bro
The counter point is it's a pretty low reward play (you might keep one of your scumbuddies out of a yeet pool for a bit, you maybe get a bit of towncred) with a lot of opportunity to backfire if one of them flips scum and is linked back to the person pushing it and even if they aren't they lose any potential gains as soon as that one flips. Unless you think notty's mild attempts to persuade others that all four were town will prevent any of them from ending up back in a challenge. I don't see it as a good play from Notty to try and save a scumbuddy there.In post 1144, SirCakez wrote:this seems really obvious no?In post 1142, AGar wrote:What benefit do you see to scum angling to push a four-town mindset if there's a scumbag in there?
plant the idea of scum as town
like scum 101
What is this specifically in regards to? I'm actually not following here. If this is in response to my "hwat" comment, I want to know why you think Pookie's anti-town actions are a town indicator for him. This doesn't seem to really help with that unless I'm missing something.In post 1145, notscience wrote:Agar we had two separate players in the pool talk about auto challenging.
If you think all four are town, and those are the only four up for a yeet, you should be angling to actually get the one you suspect is most dangerous to get yeeted, not hide behind "I lead elims on scum, not town" and "no one would listen to me because meta."In post 1145, notscience wrote:And yeah, I didn’t go “yes this guy is town but he’s an asshole who was anti town so elim him” because I have zero desire to try and confidently shove a miselim. Look at me yesterday- I was originally content to hammer anyone but after I realized it was four town I couldn’t bring myself to hammer her. I lead elims on scum, not on town.