In post 1415, MathBlade wrote: In post 1412, Titus wrote: In post 1401, MathBlade wrote: In post 1396, Titus wrote:I can't endorse a gamethrow here. Looks like we're going to nightphase.
Last time you said that you were entirely wrong on the gamestate. *sigh*
Can you at least try doing some of the narrative stuff or VCA stuff you’re known for?
Anything to explain?
It feels like you’re playing defense versus explaining something I can understand.
I have been explaining. You just aren't listening because you're starting from the position I am wrong.
1) Scum didn't care if Koba or no elimination got hammered. They definitely don't double hammer as you propose. Look at who avoided the major wagons. Peta.
2) DV bussed either Pooky or Peta with his votes. The Peta vote has many more advantages for scum over DVs Pooky vote.
Assuming I take what you said in this paragraph at face value Peta vote having more advantages means Peta more likely town? I am really trying here but like there’s no explanation. You’re just stating unsubstantiated things here and just reading them in like two seconds shows it false. I need some analysis something deeper than just a barebones assertion here.
No. DV vote makes more sense and more advantages if Peta is scum over DVs Pooky vote. You aren't reading what I am saying.
DV's Peta vote works for scum because of the wagon state.
DV had three votes.
Townie had two votes.
DV puts Peta at two votes.
This serves to distance between the two. If the wagon shifts to Peta, scum lose the lover mafia and DV looks good. If DV goes through they look less like partners. I have already said this.
DV's Pooky vote is RVS and scum rarely stay on each other long in RVS.