Hm, when he first time scumread Artemiana... it was a moment when people didnt want to elim cops t3 and kitty (both had votes), but thats interesting that Enchant had many votes also in that moment. Artemiana had only dgb's vote. Nero and me decided to vote cabd... and tge he first time suggested to vote Artemiana.
In post 1599, Vasex wrote:Cabd attacks people, which he knows very well. Arte and Dunn.
The only question is it because he really sure he found scums, or just worried about that they can easily find him knowing him too...?
Buuuut... talking about the second option. Neither Artemiana(and Anastasia), nor Dunn were suspecting Cabd... Artestasia's scumreads: mark,vasex,etine,ndmath,samantha. Dunn scumread mostly only STD.... This is std scumreads cabd, but dunn scumreads std, not cabd... "what has cabd done?", "exactly"
Well , this is a quite strange tactic for cabd-scum to attack Artestasia and Dunn, who are not dangerous for him at all.
Maybe only one exception: if they are dangerous for his partners. But their voices are not too loud and they cannot create a wagon to ndmath or std ... so... it seems cabd is town really. Or just sick/crazy, like fond of fonding difficulties for himself, attacking his allies.
Though Dunn has voted Andre, then Kityy voted Andre, but still cabd was waiting rather long with no real danger for Andre...
I think cabd is town
I want cabd's take too
The game was abandoned but a large part of day 1 still happened
Look.
Artemiana had 1 vote.
T3 had 8 votes. Kitty 1 vote.
Enchant 4 votes
Cabd 3 votes.
Nero and I added 2 votes to cabd... he was from enchant, and samantha unvoted t3... it became 5 votes cabd 3 votes enchant. 7 tr, 0 kitty (deathnote unvoted), 1 art. Im from mobile phone so please check.
Cabd immediately came and suggested Artemiana is scummy.
Why not t3 and kitty? Maybe cops, ok.
Why not enchant? This is more interesting question, moreover enchant was suspecting cabd first time and voting on rvs (not much, but..).
So to survive he could attack enchant.
But he didnt.
So maybe he is with enchant, if scummy.
What do you think?
Or maybe he was busing with you.
Or maybe he is just a town who dont think about survival and talked just about most suspicious player for him.
Arte was during rellacement at this moment btw
One more important moment: t3 was very red for cabd (among three scummys for him - std, t3 and etine). T3 has 7 votes, enchant has 3 votes, but cabd with 5 votes attacks artemiana with 1 vote....
Though t3 is claimed cop so... maybe not valid. Enchant is more interesting option here. And there was no enchant in his rainbow list, so he could vote him instead of etine, t3 and std... why didnt ge do it? This is the main question. Either it ruins the idea or survival vote , or it just proving that they are both scums
In post 1635, Vasex wrote:Enchant, what do you think about cabd? Stop ignoring it
Idk, don't kill him today. He undirectly attacked Cop claims (by stating 1-2-Shot Cops is something stupid), so if both Cops is bullshit (which is possible), he most likely town.
In post 1563, Anastasia wrote:Also the symmetric nature of your "read-wall" feels fake.
4-4-4-6-2 feels like something you planned out to look pretty rather than how you actually feel about each slot.
I could probably pick out your entire scum team just based on how fake your reads are.
I should do that.
In post 1564, Cabd wrote:Please do, would be happy to see your results!
As you can see, I called his readslist fake and boasted that I could pick out his entire scum team just based on how fake his reads were.
His reaction to it was one of
amusement
That is not a town!POV reaction.
A scum who has generated a fake!readlist and put careful touches on how he hid his team would be amused and interested to see if I could actually nail all of them - he thinks I will miss and be completely off base; the odds are quite low I could nail all of his team.
A town!POV does not have this reaction because that readlist is something
real
to them,
A town!POV believes that I am
scum
and attacking them based on nothing.
Note the timestamp: Reaction Test/Reaction Post from him were both posted at 8:46 - within one minute. This is why you do reaction test baiting in real time against scum - when they do not have time to generate a Town!POV they slip and just let their true feeling show.
Scum!him was amused to see me attempt to "solve" his fake readslist - he let his true reaction slip through.
You would need huge meta knowledge to determine something like this. It sounds like typical confirmation bias. You just want to think that he is scum.
The truth is that he wasn't "really" amused. It is the same reaction that you would give to flat earth believer, when you know that arguing with them is futile. The idea of 'finding entire scumteam' is as ridiculous as conspiracy theory. It makes no sense to argue it for real.
In post 1635, Vasex wrote:Enchant, what do you think about cabd? Stop ignoring it
Idk, don't kill him today. He undirectly attacked Cop claims (by stating 1-2-Shot Cops is something stupid), so if both Cops is bullshit (which is possible), he most likely town.
In post 1635, Vasex wrote:Enchant, what do you think about cabd? Stop ignoring it
Idk, don't kill him today. He undirectly attacked Cop claims (by stating 1-2-Shot Cops is something stupid), so if both Cops is bullshit (which is possible), he most likely town.
One thing that really bothers me, is the counterwagon. Lets say that cabd is scum. What are his teammates doing? Pushing Ana? They all bus? They stay afk? Is Vasex yelling in scumPT, POMOSH POMOSH POMOSH, i can't solo carry.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
woulda been funnier if vasex didn't get in the way
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
