Mini Normal 2211 || Summer Meet [Endgame]

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 5:58 pm

what until much later? bugspray spammed the space in which I could have placed the post in it.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 5:58 pm

monkey → bugspray strings of posts → monkey. it was a direct answer.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:00 pm

the whole thing that i was talking about was the pr/pt and NOWHERE did I mention anything about scum. saying that it was what I was talking about is FORCING it.

Umlaut · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:01 pm

In post 1069, Egix96 wrote:
In post 1037, Umlaut wrote:Sort of back but it's going to be a while before I can read 20 pages and it sounds like we don't have a while

What is VC / what are leading wagons?
The burning question right now is whether or not you think HEM scumslipped

I've failed at going to bed so I can answer this (and already did, in 1056). No, I don't think HEM slipped that every PR in the setup has a private topic, because I don't believe that's true in the first place and so HEM couldn't possibly have been pre-informed of it being true.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:03 pm

"so why does literally every tpr have to have access to a pt?"
is this a question? yes

"maybe scum has informed roles that know something about town roles and hoods/pts."
is this a question? no.

"They don't. I just made a mistake."
is this an answer to a question? yes.

Egix96 · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:07 pm

In post 1056, Umlaut wrote:I really can't imagine a setup where scum is informed that every single PR has a private topic. Well, I can imagine it but it would be such a terrible setup that I'm rejecting it out of hand. So HEM can't possibly be "slipping" something if it isn't actually true. I don't think we can read into that one way or the other.

VOTE: bugspray for the sake of being contrarian, on balance I have a gut feeling Dunn flips green in which case we learn pretty much nothing from his death whereas (1) I don't have a similar feeling with bugspray and (2) even if town at least they've generated enough associatives that we get usable information from the flip. I considered going back to HEM but he's towned up quite a bit IMO

I don't think you quite understand.
Hem later tried to claim that they were responding to a post from the bottom of the previous page.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:07 pm

In post 1, Cook wrote:The Setup
I can guarantee the following:
This setup follows Normal guidelines for roles.
There is only one scumteam. This scumteam is the Mafia.
Any PT will have daytalk.
Scum are multitasking.
Flavor has no effect on the game.

Is it because I mistook PT and PR one and the same? Yes, and this is what I've been talking about.

Is it because Dunn mentioned it in this post:

In post 73, Dunnstral wrote:No, that's just a general way of covering roles like neighbor and mason

And I thought Dunn was hunting for PRs? Yes.

Egix96 · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:08 pm

In post 1079, humaneatingmonkey wrote:"so why does literally every tpr have to have access to a pt?"
is this a question? yes

"maybe scum has informed roles that know something about town roles and hoods/pts."
is this a question? no.

"They don't. I just made a mistake."
is this an answer to a question? yes.

May not be a question, but sure as heck could be interpreted as one.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:09 pm

In post 1081, humaneatingmonkey wrote:And I thought Dunn was hunting for PRs? Yes.

Then why didn't you push that when it happened?

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:09 pm

In post 1080, Egix96 wrote:Hem later tried to claim that they were responding to a post from the bottom of the previous page.

Are you really pushing for this Egix? Really? Really you believe this?

#898 - monkey
#899 - bugspray
#900 - bugspray
#901 - bugspray
#902 - bugspray
#903 - monkey

You would really argue that it was MUCH later? Really? Really you believe this?

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:10 pm

In post 1083, Dunnstral wrote:Then why didn't you push that when it happened?

I wasn't paying attention

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:11 pm

In post 1082, Egix96 wrote:May not be a question, but sure as heck could be interpreted as one.

Oh okay. So you really think I would answer "a question that could be interpreted as one" that could have obviously implicated me as scum RATHER than the OBVIOUS QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED OF ME?

Really? Really you believe this?

Umlaut · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:11 pm

In post 912, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I still want osuka to happen. I'm absolutely convinced that it's a fakeclaim and he's gonna flip scum anyway. VOTE: osuka
I am willing to lynch Dunnstral. I want more time to evaluate Egix. I don't think bugs is a good counterwagon.

HEM, what's changed for you here? You're explicitly attempting to gather support for Bugs over Dunnstral now.

Egix96 · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:11 pm

In post 1075, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what until much later? bugspray spammed the space in which I could have placed the post in it.

The thing I said you should have done at the time...

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:14 pm

In post 1087, Umlaut wrote:HEM, what's changed for you here? You're explicitly attempting to gather support for Bugs over Dunnstral now.

I thought your vote on him makes sense that it's better to flip him because it would yield more information — information that is necessary for me because I think there's an actual scum push to force a wagon on me and I want to know if bugs/osuka/lemons is a scum team.

bugspray · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:15 pm

In post 1050, Cook wrote:humaneatingmonkey (2): InsidiousLemons, osuka

what if we flashyeet this instead

Egix96 · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:16 pm

In post 1086, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 1082, Egix96 wrote:May not be a question, but sure as heck could be interpreted as one.
Oh okay. So you really think I would answer "a question that could be interpreted as one" that could have obviously implicated me as scum RATHER than the OBVIOUS QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED OF ME?

Really? Really you believe this?

Idk, maybe I'm just being a gullible <insert preferred self-deprecating term here>
I haven't been getting enough sleep to be able to think straight about all this

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:16 pm

I haven't moved my vote because I thought Dunn could be a valid lynch here as well, so if anyone wants to hammer they can and we can end the day clean. But if there's enough support for a bugs wagon, I will pursue it.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:17 pm

In post 1091, Egix96 wrote:Idk, maybe I'm just being a gullible
I haven't been getting enough sleep to be able to think straight about all this

Then think about it. Because it's an obvious scum move to push that it's a slip and it's only bugs or you that I will believe made a genuine mistake here.

Egix96 · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:19 pm

In post 977, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 899, bugspray wrote:so why does literally every tpr have to have access to a pt?

In post 903, humaneatingmonkey wrote:They don't. I just made a mistake.
it's an answer to another question

In case my 1074 was phrased poorly, I was referring to this

Ivyeo · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:19 pm

In post 1090, bugspray wrote:
In post 1050, Cook wrote:humaneatingmonkey (2): InsidiousLemons, osuka
what if we flashyeet this instead

I'd prefer to not hit town

Umlaut · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:19 pm

In post 1080, Egix96 wrote:
In post 1056, Umlaut wrote:I really can't imagine a setup where scum is informed that every single PR has a private topic. Well, I can imagine it but it would be such a terrible setup that I'm rejecting it out of hand. So HEM can't possibly be "slipping" something if it isn't actually true. I don't think we can read into that one way or the other.

VOTE: bugspray for the sake of being contrarian, on balance I have a gut feeling Dunn flips green in which case we learn pretty much nothing from his death whereas (1) I don't have a similar feeling with bugspray and (2) even if town at least they've generated enough associatives that we get usable information from the flip. I considered going back to HEM but he's towned up quite a bit IMO
I don't think you quite understand.
Hem later tried to claim that they were responding to a post from the bottom of the previous page.

Okay, and? Even if 903

were

hypothetically responding to 901 that wouldn't be a very convincing slip.

Egix96 · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:20 pm

In post 1093, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 1091, Egix96 wrote:Idk, maybe I'm just being a gullible
I haven't been getting enough sleep to be able to think straight about all this
Then think about it. Because it's an obvious scum move to push that it's a slip and it's only bugs or you that I will believe made a genuine mistake here.

So you think Lemons is scum now?

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:21 pm

I realized I've been saying lynch when mafiascum wants to move away from this word. I'm very sorry and I'll adjust from now on.

Egix96 · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Sat May 22, 2021 6:21 pm

In post 1096, Umlaut wrote:
In post 1080, Egix96 wrote:
In post 1056, Umlaut wrote:I really can't imagine a setup where scum is informed that every single PR has a private topic. Well, I can imagine it but it would be such a terrible setup that I'm rejecting it out of hand. So HEM can't possibly be "slipping" something if it isn't actually true. I don't think we can read into that one way or the other.

VOTE: bugspray for the sake of being contrarian, on balance I have a gut feeling Dunn flips green in which case we learn pretty much nothing from his death whereas (1) I don't have a similar feeling with bugspray and (2) even if town at least they've generated enough associatives that we get usable information from the flip. I considered going back to HEM but he's towned up quite a bit IMO
I don't think you quite understand.
Hem later tried to claim that they were responding to a post from the bottom of the previous page.
Okay, and? Even if 903
were
hypothetically responding to 901 that wouldn't be a very convincing slip.

Why not?