In post 781, GrandpaMo wrote: In post 771, Roden wrote: In post 769, GrandpaMo wrote: In post 768, Val89 wrote:I really need to hear fom Grandpa on what's in James' ISO that makes him think {Clark, Roden}.
yea i just came back with work...
expect like a complete analysis on james readlist on why i do expect its clark / roden in a couple of hours
tldr; this is manly based on james interactions with clark nd roden (the post that nancy pointed out of james) i noticed it from that and started quick skimming jame's iso and seeing their reads.
Oh, you actually are suspecting me. I guessed that was a typo because your earlier post said Chuck instead of Clark, and it looked like you were accusing Nancy of thinking that.
Either way, we've already been over this. For me to be scum I'd have to have hard bussed Blurry/James before the replacement even came in. Psyche had scum read Blurry first, but the wagon didn't start until I repeatedly kept bringing attention to Blurry and soft accused Val of trying to divert attention by arguing with Nancy. Even when James subbed in, I kept my vote on his slot and continued to pressure him.
It's not like I couldn't pivot out to another wagon either. Nancy had multiple people going after her and I'd already stated that I didn't trust Val's intentions at the time. If I was scum, all I'd have to do is completely ignore Blurry and help Val put pressure on Nancy. Literally all I'd have to do is shut up and James would likely still be in the game.
If you don't believe me, go look back at what happened. It starts around page 10 I believe. I specifically say that I think the early wagon on you was bad and that we should look more at Blurry.
That doesn't clear you as town. Just because you shoved attention to someone who you weren't even the driving force at that time, that doesn't make you town.
Are you not reading...? I was the reason the wagon actually started. Please fact check what you're saying because this is proven to be false.
Note that James scumleaned you.
Ok, and? What is there to infer from that? Because two other confirmed innocents were also put in his scum pool. Nancy was also his Null read, do you think that makes her scum as well?
If you're going to note something, you need to explain why it's noteworthy. You haven't explained anything though so far.
Also notate that Val, and I believe Clark had scumread Blurry as well and so that makes you scumreading them more NAI.
Ok, now I know you're either not actually reading or you're just scum. Go read starting at page 10, the order of events proves that you're wrong here.
Also for the second part is not true, you could have done the same Clark done and scumread Chuck out of no where and find yourself to explore a scumspot.
Uh, what? What does this even mean? And what does it have to do with what I said?
If you would have shut up, there would still have been the CC and hammer still would have still proceeded with or without your input.
...What? There likely would've never been a hammer in the first place without my input. The wagon literally didn't exist until I gave my input and voted Blurry. Psyche and Nancy both had multiple votes on them at the time and were mid-wagon before I said we needed to pay more attention to Blurry. Blurry only had one vote on them at the time.
Can you explain to me how it makes sense for me to be scum in this situation? In what universe does it make sense for me to see
two
easy mis-elim wagons to jump onto, and instead tell everyone we should vote Blurry who at the time was quietly coasting by? If I'm scum I'm literally just throwing the game in my opening posts. I don't understand how this makes me scum.
GrandpaMo wrote:Can you give me why you are town not mentioning EoD of day one nor mentioning anything regarding your reads?
???
I didn't even say anything about the end of Day 1? You're the only one bringing it up. I don't understand why I'm not allowed to bring up my reads either. You might as well tell me to accept your accusation and stop defending myself lol.
Is it because your own reads and votes incriminate you? Because you didn't vote Blurry/James, and you hammered Chuck with a naked vote.
