My AC is great in my living room but bad in my bedroom.
Will hopefully do when caught up.
My AC is great in my living room but bad in my bedroom.
Not scumreading this but I'm shocked someone could get opinions at this point. I'd say town for getting things going.In post 249, MaxTheFox wrote:What discussion have you been doing until page 10? Most of your posts up to that point were, as I said, question-dodges. What town intent could this possibly have? But honestly it's early and I'm not locking onto you yet. Do better.In post 195, oʍo wrote:Weird bc I've been doing more discussion than you have. Sounds like youre your own obstacle to getting into discussion and you're projecting that onto me
Also what you claim isnt proof that is my intent nor does your analysis look at intent. Happy to dunk you if you keep this up.
Reads:
TOWN BIN
MaxTheFox - I'm town.
Salsabil - good tone and trying to solve the game early = town in my eyes.
TOWN LEAN
Saudade - at first I didn't like their tone but I don't really see scum being likely to be so nonchalant, if that's the right word.
Manatee - gut read. Trust me on this.
Not_Mafia - yes he is a troll but at the same time it looks like he's actually contributing and trying to solve. Unlike the other Miltank avatar in the game...
NULL
Everyone else, expect another list later in day 1 when there is more content.
SCUM LEAN
omo - trolled in an useless way, dodged questions, picked up the slack in the last page which is why I'm not binning them as scum,
DGB (Looker) - another gut read. I'll let DGB post before voting them though.
SCUM BIN
Nobody yet.
Like DGB as town. Mindmeld.In post 276, DrippingGoofball wrote:Is this "caught for the wrong reasons?"In post 271, ManateeDude wrote:VOTE: Roden
i think ur getting way too defensive considering the people calling u out r not even full on saying ur wolfy
That's the question.
The fuck??In post 279, Roden wrote:Side note but I'd rather avoid the song and dance of taking me to E-1 to get me to claim. I'm telling you now that it's a waste of time and that I don't really want to bother defending myself for the next few days over literally nothing. So if y'all want me to claim now just say the word.
Why does your tone sound different than the last time we played together?In post 294, Roden wrote:VOTE: ManateeDude
So you're saying you're not paying attention and just sheeping the first player to make a detailed scum read? And your own justification for voting me is that I'm "defensive"? You might as well be scum claiming tbh.
I want to see what owo is about. I townread most players on both wagons but I want to look at Dwlee more based on the votes.In post 297, T3 wrote:
I like this as town.In post 315, Saudade wrote:to be fair there hasn't been a single obvtown in this game so far and that's a bit worrying
Agree both can be town.In post 328, marcistar wrote:i think owo would be town..? i dont see anything wrong with them
My posting depends on real life. After that, I prioritize deadline games and elo games. D1 RVS stage I hate, so it's my lowest priority.In post 384, Roden wrote:Does scum!Titus usually play the way she has this game i.e. low key with sparse posts? Last mini normal she played as a "too good to be true" townie and won.In post 378, Saudade wrote:If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titusIn post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote
Welp. Looks like I am going to hammer you in elo again.In post 389, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm giving myself 3 days to read Titus.
Not a single reason on anyone?In post 392, Dwlee99 wrote:I am having trouble reading people so I'm sheeping my mason buddy.
VOTE: Titus
These aren't horrible. Geratim down (lack of posting), owo up to lean town. Roden to null. NM down to null. Salsa to high town. Marci to lean town.In post 404, ManateeDude wrote:[Saudade, ssbm, max]
[Roden, Salsa, N_M]
[geraint, marci, goofball] null
[Titus, Dwlee]
[owo]
so this is out there
You're nothibg but a child flailing right now.In post 469, Dwlee99 wrote:Titus/Geraintm/???
Not common but not unheard of.In post 478, MaxTheFox wrote:Are fake guilties really such a common thing?
Good luck with this push "mason".In post 486, Dwlee99 wrote:No, I caught Titus. That's very town-indicative.
This is a good question.In post 487, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:So you will meta N_M but not Dwlee? Why is that?
yeah i think this chalks up what i was trying to get at. i'd probably heard the term pre flip associative but it wasnt part of my vocabulary or a term I'd use when describing what i was aiming to describeIn post 476, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Maybe you didnt think it but the way you two were acting looked to me like you were town treating each other as town, or one or both of you were scum. You two were building off of each other and there was no evidence of suspicion between you.In post 424, ManateeDude wrote:i didnt think the TRs were meant to be taken seriously given it was like the first page. i didnt think i presented theorycrafting as inherently scummy but that i thought he should focus on reads instead of drawing on weird interpersonal theories that were pretty flimsy in their reasoning
You did not directly present theorycrafting as scummy, but it read to me that way. Maybe I'm not reading it correctly. If you thought he should be focusing on [individual] reads instead of pre-flip associatives, I feel like you dont come up with this term "theorycrafting" that you give an entirely different definition to. You just use the terms that already exist for this purpose. Were you aware of the term "pre-flip associative" when you made the initial theory crafting post?
To pull a T3, [redacted]In post 497, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't have a good attention span. I don't know what from ever playing with me would make you think that.
So you mostly play at work is what you're saying, right?In post 498, Dwlee99 wrote:Maybe that I post so much from 8-5 EST on weekdays is any indication?