mini normal 2226; who won

tris · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:55 pm

VC 1.06

Flubbernugget (4):

Umlaut 29, T3 113, Vulture 152, Alchemist21 371

MegAzumarill (3):

Datisi 286, Aristeia 327, Gamma Emerald 364

Seanzie (1):

Flubbernugget 26

ChaosOmega (1):

Lukewarm 259

Umlaut (1):

Titus 74

Alchemist21 (1):

Seanzie 12

Titus (1):

MegAzumarill 142

Lukewarm (1):

ChaosOmega 261

not voting:

with 13 alive it takes 7 to destroy.

deadline:

(expired on 2021-08-08 18:55:00)

and, MegAzumarill is v/la till Sunaday

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:56 pm

In post 374, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
I agree with you, scum very rarely metadive anyone because they have no need to and don’t feel like spending the energy reading other games.

Yup, and the one time I’ve seen scum actually seemingly put in an effort, it was clearly a load of bunk

T3 · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 1:08 pm

Also, scum Datisi asks more questions.

Lukewarm · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 1:18 pm

In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.

The town read thing I think is more that Scum!T3 just does not give his partners town reads. In the 4 or so t3 scum games I have looked at, the best his partners have ever gotten was null I believe.

But yeah, I cannot imagine scum!T3 going to this much effort to make a town read, when he could just as easily just call you a gut town read, or agree with my reasons that I just gave, or come up with something else from this game. Digging into 3 of your past games and counting the number of times you quote people in each seems like a lot of wasted effort for scum!T3.

Lukewarm · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 1:20 pm

In post 374, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
I agree with you, scum very rarely metadive anyone because they have no need to and don’t feel like spending the energy reading other games.

I would not be surprised to see scum doing a meta dive to justify a scum read, but this is for a day 1 town read lol

Lukewarm · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 1:22 pm

@Alchemist, thoughts on the chaos and the meg scum reads going around?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 1:24 pm

In post 378, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
The town read thing I think is more that Scum!T3 just does not give his partners town reads. In the 4 or so t3 scum games I have looked at, the best his partners have ever gotten was null I believe.

But yeah, I cannot imagine scum!T3 going to this much effort to make a town read, when he could just as easily just call you a gut town read, or agree with my reasons that I just gave, or come up with something else from this game. Digging into 3 of your past games and counting the number of times you quote people in each seems like a lot of wasted effort for scum!T3.

There was one time he gave a partner a townread but it was for “meta reasons” which was why the unexplained Datisi meta TR made me insta-vote him

MegAzumarill · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 2:24 pm

I would like to point out that the initial push on me is due to factor's outside of the game itself. (I.e. the distance from me to the game due to V/LA) Additionally I am not going to have much time to defend myself due to V/LA after this, so I would like you to suspend your disbelief until I can start working with my proper town boots when I get back. Discussing me when I'm not going to be able to respond isn't going to help us find scum. I will be in more of a position to explain my decisions when I am back. Let's cool the mislim juice till then.

Datisi · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 2:35 pm

In post 382, MegAzumarill wrote:I would like to point out that the initial push on me is due to factor's outside of the game itself. (I.e. the distance from me to the game due to V/LA)

i would like to point out that this is not the case. it's not just about you being v/la and not following the game closely, my issue is that your post seemed like textbook scum who isn't active making a post that seems vaguely solvey but it's actually ~air~. i had this tell come up in a recent town game of mine, i can find the links later if needed, it is still fresh in my mind which is why i jumped when i saw the post

also i'm not sure i like this when the case on you isn't even just that one post but /shrug, i'll focus energy elsewhere in the meantime

T3 · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 3:04 pm

In post 112, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.

More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong

Combing through Flubber's ISO I found this. I have a hard time believing Flubber thought Seanzie was actually pushing Alch.

Titus · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:11 pm

In post 241, Gamma Emerald wrote:anyone have questions for me?

Hmmm...townish here

Titus · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:17 pm

In post 289, T3 wrote:
In post 274, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before I post my reasons for TRing Aristeia, I have a bit of an odd question for Datisi:
Would you rather be a one-shot bulletproof or one-shot vigilante?
Oh, I know what's going on.

If we're right, I am a total jerk, sorry not sorry.

Titus · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:19 pm

In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.
How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.

*facepalm* You have the subtlety of a jackhammer and that's coming from ME!

Titus · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:22 pm

In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.

I'm ok with

Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.

Titus · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:24 pm

In post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
VOTE: T3
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.

T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his meta

Titus · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:28 pm

VOTE: Meg

@Gamma, Sorry I can't invent a good reason here. Guess I'll have to be a sheep. I guess our creativity will have to start tomorrow.

Titus · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:32 pm

By the way, I don't think I am ever voting Gamma this game unless I have horribly read things wrong. I'm definitely not today.

tris · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:33 pm

prodding Seanzie

Titus · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:41 pm

In post 388, Titus wrote:
In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
I'm ok with

Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.

All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyia

Lukewarm · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:44 pm

In post 393, Titus wrote:
In post 388, Titus wrote:
In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
I'm ok with

Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyia

I don't know what you are saying here, can you rephrase?

Titus · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:48 pm

In post 394, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 393, Titus wrote:
In post 388, Titus wrote:
In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
I'm ok with

Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyia
I don't know what you are saying here, can you rephrase?

The names I have listed are my locktowns.

I want y'all to fill out the no lim pool.

Then we go to town and axe murder someone.

Lukewarm · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:59 pm

In post 395, Titus wrote:The names I have listed are my locktowns.

I want y'all to fill out the no lim pool.

Then we go to town and axe murder someone.

I see. This is about where I am at (sperate lines are sorted, but each line is not sorted)

TownDatisi, T3

Better then nullAristeia, Gamma Emerald, Umlaut

NullSeanzie, Titus
Vulture, Alchemist21

Worse then nullFlubbernugget

ScumMegAzumarill, ChaosOmega

I think that both Meg's and Chaos's responses to suspicions were pretty bad

Titus · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:01 pm

I am reluctant but ok with no Umlaut today. Ari I'd vote those toxic posts away.

Lukewarm · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:07 pm

I have a strong preference to a Chaos > Meg elim day 1.

I think that they are both about equally scummy, but Meg having actually no opinions in thread means that we don't get any associatives from a Meg flip.

Titus · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:13 pm

In post 398, Lukewarm wrote:I have a strong preference to a Chaos > Meg elim day 1.

I think that they are both about equally scummy, but Meg having actually no opinions in thread means that we don't get any associatives from a Meg flip.

Relatable opinion. If there was a choice between those two, I'd see your point. It's Flubber v Meg though and a scum vote is better than a town one.