Wrong, it means I support it. Better luck next time.
In post 283, Lukewarm wrote: In post 261, ChaosOmega wrote:
If everyone is jumping off, why would I be so desperate as scum to keep on here? Wouldn't this draw attention to me as it has?
Would you call scum "describing a reason why they scum read the person they are currently voting" as desperate? I didn't, and wouldn't. That is a strange interpretation of my words.
The desperation part is in response to your
260, saying that Chaos "feels like scum realizing that their early day 1 miselim is starting to slip away, and finally stepping in to try and keep it on the table". This is not a strange interpretation of your words.
In post 283, Lukewarm wrote: In post 261, ChaosOmega wrote:
The jump on and off of Aristeia doesn't feel natural to me. Did you scumread her when you voted her in 171?
What does not feel natural to you? I said she did not have reads, and that was worrying to me. She gave a read list, and provided reasonings when asked.
I'm going to talk about this more further down, but it feels mechanical, like you're going through motions to look town and not actually scumhunting. It doesn't feel like you were trying to sort Aristeia, it feels like you were trying to buddy them and look productive while doing so.
In post 283, Lukewarm wrote: In post 261, ChaosOmega wrote:As for other reads I have, Umlaut, Seanzie, Vulture, and Datisi for town, something about Gamma is pinging me, but I can't really put it into words, so I'm ignoring it for now, still think Flubber is scum, the push on Seanzie and his post about mindmelding w/ Titus reads phony.
See, this is what I find strange about your response. One of the things that I said was bothering me was that you don't have reads out there
In post 259, Lukewarm wrote:As of now he has commented on T3, and Flubber, and thats it.
And even with the two of them, he has been stand offish of taking stances. Despite having interacted with T3, I have no idea if he thinks that T3 is townie or scummy? So that leaves Chaos's only read in thread to be flubber.
And, with Flubber, he also held back...
And you see me make that point. Apparently realize that you should put some reads out out, but then also don't realize that I had a point, and therefore valid reason to pressure you for reads?
There seems to me to be a bit of cognitive dissonance between the omgus voting me reaction (which when coming from town, I find normally comes from a place of feeling like the reasons the person is scum reading you are non-genuine), while also addressing my biggest concern about you in this way.
I saw you steal that point from Flubber's
232, along with your point about me trying to stay on wagon from Datisi's
230. You can try to frame it as OMGUS, but I'm attacking you because I think you're scum.
-----
In post 281, Lukewarm wrote:Me: I see something I found suspicious about Flubber, so I vote him and explain my suspicions
Flubber: Explains his thought process behind the things that I found suspicious
Me: I moved my vote
----
Me: I see something that found suspicious about Aristeia, so I vote her and explain my suspicions
Aristeia: Responds to the thing that I found suspicious, and provides a read lsit
Me: I move my vote
----
Me: I see somethings Chaos has done that I find suspicious, so I vote him and explain my suspicions
Chaos:
~Vote: Luke
~actually I never did anything wrong, and and address the reasons Luke stated to scum read me and
~actually, wasn't Luke being suspicious earlier, when he did this other interaction with Aristeia
~(Of course, I never voiced any opinions on either Luke or Aristeia until Luke started voting me)
This doesn't feel like you're trying to find scum. It's like you're posting in a formulaic way trying to look good and can justify your actions.
I never said that I never did anything wrong, so that's a misrep. If anything, I imply the opposite in
266 when I say "I am aware with my posts up to this point that I can be suspected". And between my latest post and this one you're referencing, you hadn't yet made a complete about-face to have Ari as one of your top townreads after suspecting them for having no reads.
-----
285 from Alchemist feels weird to me bringing up his post count. It's not done explicitly, but it feels like he's trying to use that to show his towniness. I feel the same thing as Meg in
284 that I'm getting weird vibes from him, but I think there's a decent chance this is just playstyle difference, so I'm not really interested pushing there today.
I'm not going to be around until tomorrow around the same time. I want to look through Gamma's ISO in more detail next, but if anyone wants me to answer something in particular, feel free to ask.
