In post 340, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I would prob join if i didn’t feel tempted to vote Testarossa.In post 275, Almost50 wrote:How about 3?In post 79, T3 wrote:2 votes isn't pressure.
VOTE: T3
You let us know when you feel pressured enough.
T3 is just so adorably wagonable this game. I just wanna hug him, stroke him behind the ear and whisper: "you’re going to hell buddy))"
In post 340, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I would prob join if i didn’t feel tempted to vote Testarossa.In post 275, Almost50 wrote:How about 3?In post 79, T3 wrote:2 votes isn't pressure.
VOTE: T3
You let us know when you feel pressured enough.
T3 is just so adorably wagonable this game. I just wanna hug him, stroke him behind the ear and whisper: "you’re going to hell buddy
The case against Nero is that he's playing different to his town meta.In post 423, Shrek wrote:can someone summarize the cases against nero and t3 again for me plox
One game =/= meta shift. If I learned anything from TOS and offsite mafia, an informed town is a winning town. I don't support this.In post 6, Dwlee99 wrote:I noticed that the site meta has changed over time.
It used to be that power roles were helpful to the town, and that claims helped solve the game. This is no longer true.
I just finished playing Sybil's Elegy which was a great example of the role distribution being designed to confuse at best, and F up at worse, the town. I have played others with similar anti-town mod shenanigans.
Here's the deal.
We should not claim, ever.Treating the game as mountainous will increase our chances of winning.
What we should do (and I include vanilla townies) is to crumb our night choices somehow BEFORE the night. Vanilla townies must crumb fake targets.
When you're dead, and we know your role and alignment, we can go back and use the crumbs for the solve.
Solving games by way of RESULTS and CLAIMED ROLES will not work. It just doesn't work anymore.
VOTE: DGB
Oh OK, nevermind that. It read like a serious strategy proposition.In post 42, Dwlee99 wrote:It wasn't. It's a copypasta (as gamma pointed out)In post 38, LicketyQuickety wrote:How serious was your first post?In post 31, Dwlee99 wrote:Scum?In post 14, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm gunna veto this, but still read it as Townie.
How does it feel to have a wrong opinion?In post 348, DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah Nero is town.
In post 427, T3 wrote:The case against Nero is that he's playing different to his town meta.In post 423, Shrek wrote:can someone summarize the cases against nero and t3 again for me plox
In the original context it was. (Original post)In post 430, KittyTacky wrote: Oh OK, nevermind that. It read like a serious strategy proposition.
Actually the fact that you actually weren't in SE should have tipped me off. But I thought maybe I was misremembering.In post 434, Dwlee99 wrote:In the original context it was. (Original post)In post 430, KittyTacky wrote: Oh OK, nevermind that. It read like a serious strategy proposition.
I think these traits aren’t as town indicative as you claim, especially not to the level where you had them as "locktown". I’ve caught up as scum before and i do it in the exact manner, where i don’t look ahead and also ask some pointless questions to look town from it.In post 424, MegAzumarill wrote:I feel like scum would want to look at the current dynamics of the game before posting. Also the content feels more like a legitimate question from a town than someone with an agenda due to its weird roundabout nature. Scum certainly could post mid readthrough, but I feel like that's more of a townie thing, especially with something like that.In post 389, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What do you mean?In post 387, MegAzumarill wrote:I honestly can't imagine scum posting mid readthrough like this.
Scum can’t post midways through their catch up?
In post 431, T3 wrote:How does it feel to have a wrong opinion?In post 348, DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah Nero is town.
What happened to this?In post 287, T3 wrote:Meta wall on Nero coming soon.
Why did you stop voting Nero?
Clearly a doctored quote.In post 438, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 431, T3 wrote:How does it feel to have a wrong opinion?In post 348, DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah Nero is town.What happened to this?In post 287, T3 wrote:Meta wall on Nero coming soon.
gut, not super confident but wanted to throw it out thereIn post 420, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why do you think Roden is scum?In post 394, Save The Dragons wrote:also scum: roden
town: meg, norwee, probably other people idek yet
This would have been a lot better if you didn't include yourself...In post 441, T3 wrote:I DECLARE A TOWNBLOC!
T3, LQ, CheekyTeeky, Meg, and NorweiganboyEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
this isn't true. Not really sure if this is EAL worthy bc the short term gain seems minimal.In post 435, KittyTacky wrote:The only game I played with Nero (Sibyl's Elegy), he was traitor, and I'm not sure if his traitor meta is similar to his scum or town meta.