Nope.In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...
Large Normal 235: Large Normal With No Multiball [Game Over]
Forum rules
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Why not?In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:
Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- DrippingGoofball
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- DrippingGoofball
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Bad Player Correctional Institute, for parole violations
- Contact:
I am town and I targeted Shrek.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3- DrippingGoofball
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- DrippingGoofball
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Bad Player Correctional Institute, for parole violations
- Contact:
I think you're fake.In post 3100, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Nope.In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...
Your first posts were calling me DISLOYAL which I know is a crock.
You keep changing like a good little scum.Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3- Dwlee99
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivor
- Dwlee99
They/them- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25686
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why not?In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:
Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.I prefer they, thanks :)- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Here's my thought process... Just going to say what I'm thinking.
I think DGB is Neighborizer, but I don't think they are loyal or disloyal. I'm also unsure if they are X-shot or not.
In the case DGB is Scum who did not use a NA, then Cheeky's no result, Shreks no result, and Mega seeing both Cheeky and Shrek visited DGB makes perfect sense.
Without knowing Cheeky's role, we don't know if one of Cheeky or Shrek is Scum in the case of Town!DGB since either of them could have rolestopped DGB.
OTOH, Cheeky could be just doing a gambit and Mega is just Scum here. If that's the case then we lynch Mega. If Cheeky actually did visit DGG then I'd like to know what they got out of Gamma on N1. It makes sense that Cheeky visited Gamma N1 so that makes me less inclined that Cheeky is just pulling a gambit. So we are back to the original point that if DGB didn't do a NA then it confirms all of Mega, Shrek, and Cheeky.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:
There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why not?In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:
Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I have no modifier like those.In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:@Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?<3 xx- Dwlee99
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivor
- Dwlee99
They/them- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25686
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
Nothing. Because this is all about cheeky getting no result and mega seeing the action that gave no result.In post 3106, LicketyQuickety wrote:
So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:
There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why not?In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:
Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.I prefer they, thanks :)- Nero Cain
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Nero Cain
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44912
- Joined: December 6, 2009
I just feel like cheeky was blocked. DGB targeted shrek and then mega just lied. Someone tell me why this didn't happen?Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit- Dwlee99
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivor
- Dwlee99
They/them- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25686
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
I agree unless scum have a roleblocker.In post 3109, Nero Cain wrote:I just feel like cheeky was blocked. DGB targeted shrek and then mega just lied. Someone tell me why this didn't happen?I prefer they, thanks :)- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
In post 3103, DrippingGoofball wrote:
I think you're fake.In post 3100, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Nope.In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...
Your first posts were calling me DISLOYAL which I know is a crock.
You keep changing like a good little scum.<3 xx- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.In post 3108, Dwlee99 wrote:
Nothing. Because this is all about cheeky getting no result and mega seeing the action that gave no result.In post 3106, LicketyQuickety wrote:
So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:
There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why not?In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:
Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- Dragon of the West
-
Dragon of the West Mafia Scum
- Dragon of the West
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: May 30, 2016
Cheeky's role doesn't sound like it depends on whether or not DGB performed a night action. If it does, then a roleblock on DGB would give Cheeky a no result pm which is explicitly what cheeky is saying is NOT possible. I think Cheeky's role gets a result regardless of DGB performing a night action, otherwise why would cheeky say DGB is scum/disloyal/ascetic on a failed or no action?In post 3105, LicketyQuickety wrote:In the case DGB is Scum who did not use a NA, then Cheeky's no result, Shreks no result, and Mega seeing both Cheeky and Shrek visited DGB makes perfect sense.
Without knowing Cheeky's role, we don't know if one of Cheeky or Shrek is Scum in the case of Town!DGB since either of them could have rolestopped DGB.- Dwlee99
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivor
- Dwlee99
They/them- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25686
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
We don't know any of that without Cheeky's claim.In post 3113, Dragon of the West wrote:
Cheeky's role doesn't sound like it depends on whether or not DGB performed a night action. If it does, then a roleblock on DGB would give Cheeky a no result pm which is explicitly what cheeky is saying is NOT possible. I think Cheeky's role gets a result regardless of DGB performing a night action, otherwise why would cheeky say DGB is scum/disloyal/ascetic on a failed or no action?In post 3105, LicketyQuickety wrote:In the case DGB is Scum who did not use a NA, then Cheeky's no result, Shreks no result, and Mega seeing both Cheeky and Shrek visited DGB makes perfect sense.
Without knowing Cheeky's role, we don't know if one of Cheeky or Shrek is Scum in the case of Town!DGB since either of them could have rolestopped DGB.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- DrippingGoofball
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- DrippingGoofball
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Bad Player Correctional Institute, for parole violations
- Contact:
In post 3100, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Nope.In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...
Scum MVP right here.In post 3106, LicketyQuickety wrote:
So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:
There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why not?In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:
Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3- Dwlee99
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivor
- Dwlee99
They/them- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25686
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.I prefer they, thanks :)- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Unless Cheeky is Scum Rolestopper. Unlikely, but still possible. Or Cheeky could be RB but that is even more far fetched.In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:
Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.- Nero Cain
-
Nero Cain Survivor
- Nero Cain
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 44912
- Joined: December 6, 2009
dude cheeky was blockedOf all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit- DrippingGoofball
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- DrippingGoofball
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Bad Player Correctional Institute, for parole violations
- Contact:
Whi is lying between Cheeky and MEGA?In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:
Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.
I also need MEGA's N1 target.Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3- Dwlee99
-
Dwlee99 They/themSurvivor
- Dwlee99
They/them- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25686
- Joined: July 3, 2015
- Pronoun: They/them
- Location: Northeast USA
No... because if Cheeky was a rolestopper then mega would get no resultIn post 3119, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Unless Cheeky is Scum Rolestopper. Unlikely, but still possible. Or Cheeky could be RB but that is even more far fetched.In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:
Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.I prefer they, thanks :)- DrippingGoofball
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- DrippingGoofball
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40176
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Bad Player Correctional Institute, for parole violations
- Contact:
Cheeky never claimed to be RB'd.In post 3120, Nero Cain wrote:dude cheeky was blocked
Cheeky claimed i was disloyal, then ascetic.Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3- LicketyQuickety
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- LicketyQuickety
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
Mega didn't have a N1. They were Even Night 2-shot.In post 3121, DrippingGoofball wrote:
Whi is lying between Cheeky and MEGA?In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:
Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.
I also need MEGA's N1 target.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em. - LicketyQuickety
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- DrippingGoofball
- Dwlee99
- DrippingGoofball
- Nero Cain
- LicketyQuickety
- CheekyTeeky
- Dwlee99
- DrippingGoofball
- LicketyQuickety
- Dwlee99
- Dragon of the West
- LicketyQuickety
- CheekyTeeky
- Dwlee99
- Nero Cain
- Dwlee99
- CheekyTeeky
- LicketyQuickety
- LicketyQuickety
- Dwlee99
- DrippingGoofball
- DrippingGoofball
- LicketyQuickety
- CheekyTeeky