Mini 2230: Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night: Game Over

Medea the Alien · Post Post #4175 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:20 am

Right, I take that as fairly clearing, given I suspect scum wants to demonize themselves ASAP.

But even before that, the way he cased Pooky comes off as incredibly uninformed.

ManateeGal · Post Post #4176 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:27 am

In post 4121, Spiffeh wrote:Manatee needs to confirm if they were demonized Night 2 or Night 3.

corrupted AND demonized N2

Spiffeh · Post Post #4177 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:27 am

In post 4171, Snarky Fishes wrote:Why do you think scum would choose players likely to be eliminated to demonize?

It is clear scum are going for the alternate win condition. Scum need 9/13 total players to be demonized to win. As far as we know, there is no way for scum to demonize dead human players. Therefore, it is ideal for scum to demonize players that are likely to die first/soon so they don't miss out on a potential number towards their win condition. It's also why I believe they demonized me on Night 3: I came into today in danger of being a likely mis-lim and it is most efficient for them to demonize me before I die.

unwnd · Post Post #4178 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:28 am

While I don't have a case I gave a brief demonstration why I believe it to be Dragons as well, Snarky

ManateeGal · Post Post #4179 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:31 am

unwnd you made a statement yesterday implying htbd and pooky wouldnt be scum together. could you explain that thought process and how its changed into today?

Here There Be Dragons · Post Post #4180 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:33 am

Hello. We're the desharder you're looking for. We are a human vt, demon vanillarizer & shard destroyer.

I see now why the vanillarizer is actually quite helpful. I was afraid we would be suplexed into the sun if we claimed it earlier. In retrospect, maybe we should have claimed sooner and begged for shards. But we didnt know there was going to be a damn dayskip that sucked our time to work shit out away.

Sorry if my play this game has been exceptionally bad.

Snarky Fishes · Post Post #4181 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:34 am

In post 4178, unwnd wrote:While I don't have a case I gave a brief demonstration why I believe it to be Dragons as well, Snarky

Please do.

Spiffeh · Post Post #4182 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:34 am

CephTD thoughts on my AA9 = Corruptor theory?

unwnd · Post Post #4183 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:34 am

It was already earlier, like two pages back

Vanilla what now

Here There Be Dragons · Post Post #4184 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:35 am

Oh, and our ability only works on demons.

Here There Be Dragons · Post Post #4185 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:35 am

In post 4182, Spiffeh wrote:CephTD thoughts on my AA9 = Corruptor theory?

Not sure. It does make some sense. I'd kind of been dismissing her as a potential suspect.

Here There Be Dragons · Post Post #4186 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:38 am

I'll try and sit down with it again later. Fair warning, gonna be a bit busy for quite a few days here.

unwnd · Post Post #4187 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:40 am

If dragons is just town then I'm missing something.

Spiffeh · Post Post #4188 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:40 am

AA9 is next in the massclaim order provided by Dunn and should claim in her next post.

Snarky Fishes · Post Post #4189 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:51 am

In post 4181, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 4178, unwnd wrote:While I don't have a case I gave a brief demonstration why I believe it to be Dragons as well, Snarky
Please do.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #4190 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:51 am

In post 4171, Snarky Fishes wrote:Why do you think scum would choose players likely to be eliminated to demonize?

I second this.. Scum needs more demonic players to win. i am mostly town read hence explains demonic shards on night 1.

this makes me second guess my scum read on Spiffeh and more confident about my read on ManteeGal

VOTE: ManteeGal

unwnd · Post Post #4191 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:52 am

I posted it before, 4130 is what you're looking for

Spiffeh · Post Post #4192 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:52 am

AA9 can you claim please? You are next up.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #4193 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:53 am

I am a Human Vanilla Townie when the game started, now i am a demonic vanilla townie.

My character name is Orloc Dracule

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #4194 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:55 am

Spiff why are you believing Mantaee Corrupt claim so easily ? how are you sure that she ain't faking it?

Lukewarm · Post Post #4195 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:55 am

In post 4193, ArcAngel9 wrote:I am a Human Vanilla Townie when the game started, now i am a demonic vanilla townie.

My character name is Orloc Dracule

This flavor does not appear to match the claim

Lukewarm · Post Post #4196 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:56 am

I know nothing about this game, but just googled that name

ManateeGal · Post Post #4197 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:57 am

VOTE: aa9

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #4198 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:58 am

In post 4197, ManateeGal wrote:VOTE: aa9

SCUM

Spiffeh · Post Post #4199 (ISO) » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:59 am

In post 4194, ArcAngel9 wrote:Spiff why are you believing Mantaee Corrupt claim so easily ? how are you sure that she ain't faking it?

Snarky also claimed to have been corrupted, so we know that role exists unless Manatee and Snarky are the remaining two scum (which I find to unlikely).

Can you explain why you were under the impression that scum could not give shards to themselves?