In post 455, Noraa wrote: In post 414, Deimos27 wrote:In a pool of {redtea, Kop, NM} that's enough to guarantee Kop being scum. In a pool of {Noraa, redtea, Kop, NM) it guarantees at least 1 scum in {Noraa, Kop}
This logic is totally wack
I gave an objectively correct PoE. When the conditions I stated hold, those conclusions follow. For reasons that are frankly more about basic arithmetic than logic. Now if you disagree with whether the conditions hold that's another matter.
In post 456, Noraa wrote: In post 421, Deimos27 wrote: In post 415, Tamora's Angel wrote:I don't read the game like that unless absolutely forced to or scum are eliminated. With no content from NM it would be hard to eliminate him as partners with anyone.
Ok, I know I'm not in the majority by doing associatives without flips. Did you read the argument for why redtea's voting behaviour does imply they're not with NM though? I feel they should've voted Noraa instead of NM (back when they did so) if they were teammates with NM because they had been shading Noraa so much in the posts prior.
By your logic, red tea is scum with everyone in the game that they haven't voted because they've shaded everyone.
My logic could well be really bad but it's impossible to tell from your posts because you never actually refute any of my logic, you are too busy refuting imaginary logic that you project onto me. Every time I have thoroughly dismantled your misreadings and misunderstandings. I will do so yet again.
The argument wasn't that you are scum with redtea because they didn't vote you despite shading you. That's not what I said. The argument made no conclusions about your alignment and was given in a context that was only discussing whether redtea can be scum
with NM
, and I was saying I didn't think he could be.
The argument was that redtea should vote someone who is town whom they are positioned to be able to vote
rather than
vote their scumpartner. The fact that they did so suggest the person they voted wasn't in fact their scumpartner.
If you actually engaged with
my
logic, you would have a good chance of changing my mind, like Vulture did, who actually presented an independent argument to think {redtea, NM/STD} shouldn't be excluded as a potential team.
Like the thing is your reads are so messed up. Like your elim pool isn't even an elim pool. You dont have a single good reason to scum read kop whereas I have a good reason to townread them (pending confirmation since theres a replacement who i dont know)
The logic is so fucked up I dont even know where to start picking it apart.
Kop had 4 posts, there was no way I was gonna exclude them from my PoE pool are you joking? To me he was null at best. Your read of him was all meta that I do not have experience with.
