Mini Normal 2258 | Bunnies [Postgame]

[catboi]

Vote Count 1.06

Laplacian (5):

Reformed Toxic Player,Frogsterking, Andresvmb, Datisi, Aristeia

Almost50 (3):

VP Baltar, House, skitter30

innocentvillager (1):

OutWorldER

Frogsterking (1):

Laplacian

Datisi (1):

innocentvillager

Not Voting (2):

Almost50, Something_Smart

With 13 alive, it's 7 to eliminate.

Deadline for Day 1 is February 5 at 10:00 PM EST.

Deadline Timer:

(expired on 2022-02-05 23:00:00)

[Something_Smart]

Actually, I let it rest after I made my point. IV revived it.

If you make a point you should be prepared to address people who disagree or have questions about it...

[Frogsterking]

SS what is your stance on my earlier two questions:

Are any or all of a50, iv, and Lap lunchbait?

Is there any reason to believe any or all of the wagons have NOT been lead or influenced by scum?

[Something_Smart]

Are any or all of a50, iv, and Lap lunchbait?

Lap seems to be for sure. IV definitely not. A50 could go either way, I would lean yes in this game.

Is there any reason to believe any or all of the wagons have NOT been lead or influenced by scum?

No.

[Something_Smart]

Not my first choice, but I'd hammer it.

Oh yeah, this reminds me. House hammers everything, so don't put anyone at E-1.

[Reformed Toxic Player]

VP is trying to discredit my read on laplacian by attaching it to something irrelevant (my read on IV)
Its pretty clear but my read on IV did soften once i saw them post a lot more.
It's not easy for me to abandon solves i have felt high confidence on due to ego. Obviously i pivoted to laplacian because a) people werent seeing him as scum anymore b) he eas posting more robust thoughts

VP is trying to subtly plant the idea that im scummy for this without directly pushing me because his team is probably in a shit spot because I PoEd them all fast
Shrug

I'm unlikely to unvote laplacian here

[Reformed Toxic Player]

I think laplacian wagon is pure rn btw

[Reformed Toxic Player]

I cant really vocalize it but laplacian isnt a towny bumbling - its something in their language choice and how they approach the game that its from a solved perspective where they know the correct answers but have to avoid them

[Frogsterking]

I cant really vocalize it but laplacian isnt a towny bumbling - its something in their language choice and how they approach the game that its from a solved perspective where they know the correct answers but have to avoid them

Is it tone, syntax, behavior?

[Frogsterking]

Are any or all of a50, iv, and Lap lunchbait?

Lap seems to be for sure. IV definitely not. A50 could go either way, I would lean yes in this game.

Is there any reason to believe any or all of the wagons have NOT been lead or influenced by scum?

No.

Did you read my Lap case 592?

[VP Baltar]

SS, you going to vote someone at somepoint?

[Reformed Toxic Player]

I cant really vocalize it but laplacian isnt a towny bumbling - its something in their language choice and how they approach the game that its from a solved perspective where they know the correct answers but have to avoid them

Is it tone, syntax, behavior?

A mix of the first 2.

Fwiw my very first normal game was against a scum vp baltar and i correctly clocked them as scum d2 even through a pr claim

[Reformed Toxic Player]

Those were 2 separate thoughts

[VP Baltar]

Its pretty clear but my read on IV did soften once i saw them post a lot more.

It was not clear because you didn't actually say anything?

What about iv's posts did you like, let's start there.

[Reformed Toxic Player]

Nah im not wasting discussion space for this conversation

If youre trying to say im scum you should be voting me (:

[VP Baltar]

Actually, wait...

You said iv was in your solve. Lol wtf

[Reformed Toxic Player]

And?
Fun fact about mafia: people's reads can change in light of new evidence(posts)

[Something_Smart]

Did you read my Lap case 592?

I read part of it. Pretty much nothing you've said so far has resonated with me, and I don't generally find cases convincing, so I wasn't expecting it to do much for me.

SS, you going to vote someone at somepoint?

Probably not. The person I would vote is Lap, but that wagon probably goes through before I'd like to end the day.

[Reformed Toxic Player]

Why is laplacian town, vp? Since you're so desperate to push a scum me angle

[VP Baltar]

Nah im not wasting discussion space for this conversation

If youre trying to say im scum you should be voting me (:

I am just trying to understand your thought process in switching from iv to Lap when there was a viable iv wagon.

Then you said it was obvious you felt better about iv ... which idk how anyone is supposed to know that, but ok.


Then I realized you just said you felt better about iv at the same time he was in your vp/iv/Lap solve. Which, uh...

[VP Baltar]

Why is laplacian town, vp? Since you're so desperate to push a scum me angle

Definitely never said lap was town.

[VP Baltar]

What is your read on iv rn?

[VP Baltar]

Probably not. The person I would vote is Lap, but that wagon probably goes through before I'd like to end the day.

That's a fair reason to hold your vote. I'll consider it there in spirit. Why do you like a lap vote?

[skitter30]

I'm the fucking shining light of towniness.

* shining beacon of towniness

[skitter30]

VP is trying to discredit my read on laplacian by attaching it to something irrelevant (my read on IV)

I mean didnt you say iv/lap/vp was your solve? I dont think ur iv read is irrelevant in that case