Do you really wish to see the Hatter infused with sugar?In post 301, Galron wrote:With this plist there really isn't a lot of activity, like everyone's blood sugar is down or there's a carnival on the other side of town.
Because I certainly dont.
Do you really wish to see the Hatter infused with sugar?In post 301, Galron wrote:With this plist there really isn't a lot of activity, like everyone's blood sugar is down or there's a carnival on the other side of town.
What I meant was - you're voting me just because you think I snubbed you. And the truth is, I don't believe I did.In post 345, SirCakez wrote:Your posts are disingenuous and illogicalIn post 341, Greeting wrote:So it’s OMGUS. Except I never even scumcased you for this, just merely commented on the behavior. As for your complaint for people pinging you for this, my guess is that the logical solution would be to not do it or stop letting it bother you.
This game has not changed my opinion of Day 1 reads. Meh.
How is that OMGUS? You didn't even vote me
You, oh Pouty Maiden, are not the sad maiden with the braid.In post 307, Greeting wrote:In post 242, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote: The Sad Maiden with Long Braid.
In post 315, Greeting wrote:Someone could make a case on MHTP for their peculiar phrasing.
Then what did you do? You're talking nonsenseIn post 352, Greeting wrote:What I meant was - you're voting me just because you think I snubbed you. And the truth is, I don't believe I did.In post 345, SirCakez wrote:Your posts are disingenuous and illogicalIn post 341, Greeting wrote:So it’s OMGUS. Except I never even scumcased you for this, just merely commented on the behavior. As for your complaint for people pinging you for this, my guess is that the logical solution would be to not do it or stop letting it bother you.
This game has not changed my opinion of Day 1 reads. Meh.
How is that OMGUS? You didn't even vote me
Yeah, close enough. It matters less whether the body of work disrupts the assessment as scum because being a visible content mill is more importantIn post 283, Galron wrote:I want to understand what you're getting at here. I recalled something because of content, not because of the player, and I thought that content was scummy. And I think you're saying I need to know who made that content (vote) and the rest of the body of their work in order to make that judgment. Am I close?In post 256, Isis wrote:This seems really inductive when the exact identities aren't memorable so I think it's pretty scummy.
And how, praytell, do we achieve this level of wrongness?In post 326, anahit wrote:no i meant before the elimination, but once again probably shouldn’t be having this conversation
as it is like very extremely important for us to not behorribly wrong here on day one,
like we must avoid worst case situations because uttter disaster
and we also have to believe in ourselves enough on best case to push through,
so your stance as ‘figure it out later’ once again stands out as informed to me,
I despise when people cast aside a vote for OMGUS.In post 341, Greeting wrote:So it’s OMGUS. Except I never even scumcased you for this, just merely commented on the behavior. As for your complaint for people pinging you for this, my guess is that the logical solution would be to not do it or stop letting it bother you.
This game has not changed my opinion of Day 1 reads. Meh.
It strikes me as off that Greeting doesn't like.. have a different way he expects to reach town wincon? He's only mentioned waiting for a miselim and then trying to figure out who's guilty in that. That's pretty bad and feels like scum summarizing how mafia games usually -actually- go without reflecting a protown desire for this game to go well with a day one elim.In post 322, Greeting wrote:I... don't. I'll just wait. Sorry if that's not a satisfactory answer to you.In post 319, anahit wrote:also i don’t mean you should be asking other players why -
rather yourself, as how else can you find mafia,
like if all of the posts can be made by players of any alignment, and you know some of the players have to be mafia, how do you determine which of those posts were made by mafia without asking yourself ‘why is x making this post’ ‘why are they viewing the game this way’ et cetera
In post 234, SirCakez wrote:Low-key feeling the vibe to PL Dwlee for being useless
In post 331, SirCakez wrote:Is this because you actually think Dwlee's behavior is scummy or just annoyance?
In post 335, SirCakez wrote:This is also a crappy vote and it just makes me want to move back to Eden
I think we can do way better for a day 1 elim than Dwlee
what happened here thoIn post 339, SirCakez wrote:Nah i have no interest in pushing you rnIn post 290, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: Sircakez
This will probably result in a countervote from him but I want to get more cakey posting to look at and then go from there
In post 289, anahit wrote:pooky was upset with how they played as town in the game pooky was referring to; isis and i were the scumsIn post 267, Vanderscamp wrote:I have a read that if Pooky was disgusted at how badly they played in a recent game as scum, they wouldn't give this kind of terrible reasoning to sheep a vote as scum here.
i think pooky was saying i should not want to feel like pooky will solve the game if town!pooky because he did not play well as town in that game, which yeah i like said that's probably an unfair expectation
but it is like,
i obviously didn't feel that way in the aforementioned game as i was a mafia,
and if that game was paused on the final day and left up to pooky to correctly identify the mafia team then i think there is a pretty good chance pooky would have caught us
it's just that the experience of the previous days put us in a position for pooky to be miseliminated for the win there
and! i really really like to have hope
I mean that everything feels very careful, which I think is scummy.In post 291, Galron wrote:What's this?In post 252, Vanderscamp wrote:the constructed nature of the RP
Aside from the twice use of the thesaurus I certainly assure you it comes unscripted and au natural.In post 371, Vanderscamp wrote:I mean that everything feels very careful, which I think is scummy.In post 291, Galron wrote:What's this?In post 252, Vanderscamp wrote:the constructed nature of the RP
The opposite of someone like anahit, I feel like the stuff she is saying feels very unscripted and natural.
Hi!In post 372, Ahri wrote:VOTE: ToogelooIn post 366, Toogeloo wrote:I tried to skim up. I stopped reading mad hatter's posts on page 2 or 3, probably won't read another until ???.
I like Cakez so far.