In post 6515, April Ludgate wrote:VP Baltar (8): Nero Cain, Save The Dragons, Frogsterking, tenebrousluminary,
In post 6515, April Ludgate wrote:VP Baltar (5): Nero Cain, Save The Dragons, Frogsterking, tenebrousluminary,
I stand by it being a decent moon theoryIn post 6523, fireisredsir wrote:ok so i was thinking about this, and hear me out here... at first i didn't really buy that April genuinely thought the vp/frog/tene solve was a good one (cause it wasn't)
but
i think scum april would be smarter than that lol. like there's a few people saying "hmmm idk if i trust you" and math saying "let's follow you and see if you get us a scum" and i think like 95% of the time there scum april gives them a scum. i think scum april, knowing alignments, would be way less likely to consider the vp/frog solve (cause where do you even come up with that if you know vp is town) and use it as a basis to flip reads completely on vp. is that a thing? am i allowed to townread someone bc I think they'd be better at the game if they were maf? cause i kinda do
gimme titus, then ill trust youIn post 6527, April Ludgate wrote:Yeah, I'm definitely lost this game, but I think i'm only a few clicks away from finding a solve, but the thing is, I don't have the trust/momentum, and have a good chance at being one of the final misfades this game.
In post 6525, Scorpious wrote:In post 6515, April Ludgate wrote:VP Baltar (8): Nero Cain, Save The Dragons, Frogsterking, tenebrousluminary,In post 6515, April Ludgate wrote:VP Baltar (5): Nero Cain, Save The Dragons, Frogsterking, tenebrousluminary,
obviously there is one in here..
In post 6523, fireisredsir wrote:vp/frog/tene solve was a good one (cause it wasn't)
…Why didn’t you do this D3?In post 6524, April Ludgate wrote:Ugh, I had a correct town block with Yeet-VPB. Gonna go back and look to where my reads were at Day 2 now that I know Malcolm's town.
Sure, of course that is possible. Surely we have learned a lesson from the neighborhood about arbitrary groups? Is that too much to hope for?In post 6538, April Ludgate wrote:
Let's talk about this one, since you 3 are the ones here.
Do you guys think this is a possible all 4 town on Nero wagon
I didn't know VPB was town then...?In post 6540, MathBlade wrote:…Why didn’t you do this D3?In post 6524, April Ludgate wrote:Ugh, I had a correct town block with Yeet-VPB. Gonna go back and look to where my reads were at Day 2 now that I know Malcolm's town.
I think swap out Enchant or DV for Cape and this is viableIn post 6538, April Ludgate wrote:
Let's talk about this one, since you 3 are the ones here.
Do you guys think this is a possible all 4 town on Nero wagon, especially considering a Nero wagon would have been a better misfade for scum than VPB who was just hanging on?
This likely means VPB was a better misfade for scum, meaning one of VPB's pushes were likely correct. VPB's pushes were Nero and Frog.
Frogster's comment saying people were gonna start pairing VPB/Frogster up was odd to me, and it's what really started to get me to feel that way. I read it wrong, but I think feeling the offness makes sense coming from FrogsterScum.
Now, that kind of defense feels eerily similar to a ScumKill on Nero, which had the potential to setup a Frogster/Cape 1v1, which means that the neighborhood could be all town.
I think Frogster has more scum equity than Cape.
Frogster/Enchant/Titus/DV
is my current solve. The further to the back, the less sure I am, but the front 2 feel pretty good for me.
thought this was sus at the time (bc it wasn't locked on those two at the time, people were still willing to push elsewhere) and it's even more sus knowing both were townIn post 5886, Titus wrote:Fire, how do we get the lurkers to take a stance with the lim locked on VP/Nero?
A vote count is not an arbitrary group like a neighborhood.In post 6541, tenebrousluminary wrote:Sure, of course that is possible. Surely we have learned a lesson from the neighborhood about arbitrary groups? Is that too much to hope for?In post 6538, April Ludgate wrote:
Let's talk about this one, since you 3 are the ones here.
Do you guys think this is a possible all 4 town on Nero wagon
Titus timeIn post 6544, fireisredsir wrote:thought this was sus at the time (bc it wasn't locked on those two at the time, people were still willing to push elsewhere) and it's even more sus knowing both were townIn post 5886, Titus wrote:Fire, how do we get the lurkers to take a stance with the lim locked on VP/Nero?
it's possible considering everyone is going to convince themselves into voting there and will always be paranoid that there is scum in it. nero kill does also shine a spotlight on cape which... could be wifom, could be not.In post 6543, MathBlade wrote:No way scum don’t have a person in that four player hood with TPR that has flipped
I could see Cape in the DV slot.In post 6543, MathBlade wrote:I think swap out Enchant or DV for Cape and this is viableIn post 6538, April Ludgate wrote:
Let's talk about this one, since you 3 are the ones here.
Do you guys think this is a possible all 4 town on Nero wagon, especially considering a Nero wagon would have been a better misfade for scum than VPB who was just hanging on?
This likely means VPB was a better misfade for scum, meaning one of VPB's pushes were likely correct. VPB's pushes were Nero and Frog.
Frogster's comment saying people were gonna start pairing VPB/Frogster up was odd to me, and it's what really started to get me to feel that way. I read it wrong, but I think feeling the offness makes sense coming from FrogsterScum.
Now, that kind of defense feels eerily similar to a ScumKill on Nero, which had the potential to setup a Frogster/Cape 1v1, which means that the neighborhood could be all town.
I think Frogster has more scum equity than Cape.
Frogster/Enchant/Titus/DV
is my current solve. The further to the back, the less sure I am, but the front 2 feel pretty good for me.
No way scum don’t have a person in that four player hood with TPR that has flipped