I didn’t comment on it both because I didn’t really think anything of it either way and unless I take issue with Implosion’s explanation, I probably won’t but if I don’t like it, I absolutely will.In post 1717, MathBlade wrote:You’re not seeing my point.
The default setting is to do that to me.
When proven with a concrete actual example of things not matching reality,
Not only do you ignore it until it’s brought up
You just wait and see a response
You’re civil.
There’s no insulting, no talking down, no accusations
Everyone just breezed along like it’s another day in the neighborhood.
I just want that same level of courtesy.
@Math I’m sorry if you feel at all personally disrespected by me. As I’ve already stated, personally I hold you in the highest regard and I assure you I wouldn’t say something like that lightly.
I think much of your play here has been really scummy and I do feel that you have twisted and misrepped a lot of people’s posts not just mine.
Until I hear Implosion’s response, I will assume it was probably a mistake on his part. I really don’t know what more you want me to say about that.