In post 1616, Dunnstral wrote:Also their vote on me is the only vote they've placed all game.
this is bs???
when i joined there was what, like 2 days left on the timer..? and don't you already know i dont throw votes around willy nilly?
In post 1646, marcistar wrote:i think i agree positioning around me is wack by some people and its clear ppl just want an easy bandwagon instead of actually thinking about the game.
You again went out of your way to avoid answering a question directed at you. If you are town, what do you think that says about Vivax. And what are your opinions on who is mafia?
Furthermore, what do you think about the other claimed protective roles? NDMath, Legends, and Nomsy.
(third person singular possessive pronoun(Chinese languages/dialects don't care about gender in their pronouns))
reads, marcistar decided to give one for the next few 24-hour days. At the last 24 hours of the day phase, marcistar decides to add to 伊的 janitor claim that whoever 伊
Spoiler:
(third person singular pronoun(this Chinese language doesn't ahbe different caees for subject and object. No Chibese language I know does))
targets who is not at full health is healed and whoever is at full health gets flipped like a janitor, expecting everyone voting 伊 to stop voting 伊.
In post 1673, MeekMeerkat wrote:Like think about it for more than a two-second “hm could this cross town!Vivax’s mind”. In what world do scum see 4-6 townies sitting on a townie and *start a new wagon* - and how is it believable that Vivax thought that? Vivax is playing purely to survive, not solve
Differences between the present and the time quoted:
1. marcistar simply has not presented any arguments to argue against
2. The reason for the scumread is different.
3. There may be more
Also, what you quoted does happen, but not every game. The reason why I'm doing things differently is because of the second reason
L-2 and you’re casing it
And they said hidden guilt doesn’t matter
Will matter
[/spoiler
Differences between the present and the time quoted:
1. marcistar simply has not presented any arguments to argue against
2. The reason for the scumread is different.
3. There may be more
Also, what you quoted does happen, but not every game. The reason why I'm doing things differently is because of the second reason
L-2 and you’re casing it
And they said hidden guilt doesn’t matter
Will matter
In post 1673, MeekMeerkat wrote:Like think about it for more than a two-second “hm could this cross town!Vivax’s mind”. In what world do scum see 4-6 townies sitting on a townie and *start a new wagon* - and how is it believable that Vivax thought that? Vivax is playing purely to survive, not solve
I get the sense Vivax is playing to have fun. You know who I get the sense is "playing purely to survive"? marcistar.
If you get the sense the statement Vivax gave is purely to survive, what do you think of the following posts?
Spoiler: posts by marcistar showing that marcistar is "playing purely to survive"
i think ill edit this to thats all ill claim period.
if yall want to eliminate me so badly, go ahead. be ready to reap what you sow though.
In post 1646, marcistar wrote:i think i agree positioning around me is wack by some people and its clear ppl just want an easy bandwagon instead of actually thinking about the game.
By the way, this list only includes the posts before your post, which means these posts were there before you made your post.
You know, I kind of think if marcistar is town, you don't want to vote 伊 because you don't want to vote a townie. If marcistar is mafia, you are likely mafia because you don't want to vote your partner.
My next hypothesis following this is Vivax is mafia because, well I've forgotten why I had this thought.
If we do not have an execution this day phase. Everyone not voting marcistar will have to explain why they deem it better for town to have a no execute this day phase instead of an execute on someone we don't know the alignment of.
In post 1673, MeekMeerkat wrote:Like think about it for more than a two-second “hm could this cross town!Vivax’s mind”. In what world do scum see 4-6 townies sitting on a townie and *start a new wagon* - and how is it believable that Vivax thought that? Vivax is playing purely to survive, not solve
[/spoiler
I get the sense Vivax is playing to have fun. You know who I get the sense is "playing purely to survive"? marcistar.
If you get the sense the statement Vivax gave is purely to survive, what do you think of the following posts?
Spoiler: posts by marcistar showing that marcistar is "playing purely to survive"
i think ill edit this to thats all ill claim period.
if yall want to eliminate me so badly, go ahead. be ready to reap what you sow though.
In post 1646, marcistar wrote:i think i agree positioning around me is wack by some people and its clear ppl just want an easy bandwagon instead of actually thinking about the game.
[/spoiler
By the way, this list only includes the posts before your post, which means these posts were there before you made your post.
You know, I kind of think if marcistar is town, you don't want to vote 伊 because you don't want to vote a townie. If marcistar is mafia, you are likely mafia because you don't want to vote your partner.
My next hypothesis following this is Vivax is mafia because, well I've forgotten why I had this thought.
I forgot to add that:
1. the posts by marcistar since MeekMeerkat made that post continue the trend of "playing purely to survive, not solve". Also, just realised there was a "not solve" part to that sentence, which marcistar's posts fit like the cover of a Tupperware container.
2. The point about MeekMeerkat became kind of simplistic in my final post, but my actual thought about this is, if MeekMeerkat considers "playing purely to survive, not solve" likely to come from mafia, it's an interesting decision to say that about Vivax when that description doesn't fit Vivax's posting but fits marcistar's posting perfectly.
I imagine that either MeekMeerkat knows marcistar is mafia and thus thinks that "playing purely to survive, not solve" means the player is mafia, or, alternatively, if marcistar is town, MeekMeerkat thinks that "playing purely to survive, not solve" could make a convincing argument that the player is mafia, but decides not to argue that about marcistar but Vivax instead because the way marcistar was deflecting criticism made it not worth it and the potential scrutiny from a execution on a townie is not necessary to risk because there is already so much pressure on marcistar. It was decided that arguing that marcistar is town is the better option because that just reduces the chance to be scrutinised. Also, this belief that "playing purely to survive, not solve" means that MeekMeerkat likely has a tendency to
play "purely to survive, not solve" as mafia in this scenario. To counter that, MeekMeerkat likely decided to "solve" while surviving. Taking advantage of the fact that town doesn't know anyones alignment, MeekMeerkat also decides to not know anyone's alignment and argue for some townies execution with points that make for convincing arguments that the town players are mafia. This will help to completely repel arguments that they are mafia because everyone will be convinced this thought process is genuine.
I have more to say UNVOTE: to prevent a hammer temporarily until i'm done. Hammers to stop me speaking my piece, I'll consider a scumclaim. Give me an hour and a quarter to make my next post.
