Why does a player’s behaviour in this particular game warrant the need to Meta him? Scummy behaviour is scummy behaviour. Your defence of CMAR invoking tainted phrases like “policy lynch” is worth noting for the future.Rifka wrote:I have a Q for everyone wagoning CMAR. That is, have you done a sitewide ISO on this player especially in games like ''go play in traffic''? This is looking suspiciously like a policy lynch. How are you distinguishing scum-CMAR from town-CMAR in this situation?
Directing his kill seems like a reasonable suggestion. Who is going to provide the list of 5 scummy players?Rifka wrote:I suggest we give him a list of 5 scummy scums that need killing and let him choose off that list. vezopiraka is obv on that list
Is there anything Pro-Town about this statement? It’s at best childish. If you are serious that you think that Percy is mis-representing you or outright lying in his statements regarding you why don’t you demonstrate it yourself, with “proof”?Dana wrote:And Percy, again, don't bother saying anything to me unless you actually prove something instead of just stating it.
Your flip conjecture here ignores the possibility of a multi-scum environment or Raivann as a potential SK. Any reason for that?Dana wrote:I agree with the reasons given by others that his claim is probably not true. If he flips town, we'll know that Raivann is probably scum. If he flips scum we'll know that Raivann is probably town.
Please elaborate, given the potential multi-scum elements I mentioned to Dana above.CSL wrote:As it was said before, if CMAR flips scum, Raivann is obvscum
Will the ‘catch’ be rendered void based on a proper response from CSL? If not why bother to hold onto the information? If so please make sure you share before deadline.Mina wrote:By the way, guys, I have a NICE catch on CSL. I'll give him one more day to answer my questions before I say what it is.
If you are wanting to basically start a bandwagon from scratch why isn’t Richard a viable lynch option also? You assert yourself that his claim conflicts with Riavann’s. Also, Budja didn’t get to L-1 as Richard did. It seems more likely to re-assemble Richard’s wagon than to reassemble Budja’s with additional votes.Mina wrote:Hey, guys! We have about thirty-six hours before the deadline, and Budja is now a lynch option again. Who's willing to change back to the player they actually suspected?
So you are going to wait to analyze CMAR until the Day of deadline? If you seriously believe CMAR to be scum you should be doing it ASAP to make sure Town has sufficient time to digest your analysis.CSL wrote:He's been making scummy posts. I'll get to fully analysing him tomorrow, if no one hammers. (If a hammer happens before I get to it, the player who did is scum)
Furthermore, threatening that anyone who hammers is scum within 48 hours of deadline is at best anti-town.
The irony here is palatable. I note that you haven’t posted for two days but managed to respond to Raivann’s claim in 7 minutes. Has nothing else that’s happened since your last post been worth mentioning?Richard wrote:Be more specific please. Do you have any limitations? What about flavour?
BTW, someone should unvote just to be safe, but a clear wagon should remain evident. Raivann shouldn't be off the hook because of a vig claim.