*headdesk*vezokpiraka wrote:I just read my name. I assumed that because I am a girl I am also a princess.
You know kings ...princesses?
So you're claiming to be Meera Reed?
Meera Reed is Howland Reed's daughter who travels with Bran Stark to the North. Howland is one of Eddard's closest friends and controls the Neck, but is nowhere close to the throne.Drippereth wrote:I'm waiting on someone that knows the flavor to be illuminated...
White noise.Thor665 wrote:@Benmage- we understand that Vezo is anti-town and/or VI, I'm actually pretty sure every player here has said as much. Are you going anywhere with this? It feels more like white noise then scumhunting.
Perhaps it is - my white noise also included a specific question, do you have a reply to that question or are you planning to ignore it?Benmage wrote:White noise.Thor665 wrote:@Benmage- we understand that Vezo is anti-town and/or VI, I'm actually pretty sure every player here has said as much. Are you going anywhere with this? It feels more like white noise then scumhunting.
"Why do you find it unreasonable?"Thor665 wrote:I am well aware of this, please refer to my post where I bolded and underlined the relevant statements. I agree that anti-town and scummy are two different things and made it clear in my commentary that I understood this and accurately represented what it was you said.Unsight wrote:Anti-town and scummy are not synonymous.Thor665 wrote:Out of curiosity, why the soft sell on him, then?Unsight wrote:If I had a read on vezo one way or the other, I'd have given it.Yougo out of your way to bring him up,describe him as being "very anti-town" while apparently, and then mention that there are lots of people who need to be lynched first without mentioning any of them. If there are people who need rope prior to vezo why mention him by name and not them?notfinding him scummy
I see no problem with me asking you to restate your suspicions from time to time for my personal clarity's sake. Why do you find it unreasonable?Unsight wrote:Also, perhaps if you read my ISO you would be able to answer your own questions. So far I've indicated SSBF with MacCavityLock based on the flip as well as dana, drip, and LMP based on reactions to the Raivann wagon yesterday.
I believe I addressed both accusations and will now dismiss them fully with a hearty belly laugh - HAH HAH!Unsight wrote:Your entire post very much looks like either you haven't ISO'd me to actually know my thoughts so far, you're deliberately attempting to misrep me, or both.
I'll also note in your counter attack on me you didn't actually answer the question I posed to you - why the soft sell attack on Vezo if you don't want him lynched and have a list of roughly three people to lynch prior to him? I don't care for soft selling because it appears you're trying to strengthen a case without actually weighing in on it. The fact dana has now taken up the vezo case continues to give me jitters in that regard.
I looked in your ISO and found this:hasdgfas wrote:Unless I missed something, you never answered my question to you..
Of course not, however their reason is important because they need to explain why the person is vote-worthy now as opposed to the wagon started. For example, if someone is going to ditto Percy's case right now, they need to explain why they weren't willing to ditto it a week ago. Obviously something had to have changed in that time period.hasdgfas wrote:would you rather the "blatant wagoners" made a case that was exactly the same as someone else's?
You answer your first sentence with your second sentence. I believe we have two scum teams but I don't believe all my suspects are on the same one. I can see Dana and LMP being on a team with Raivann and I can see SSBF and MacCavityLock being on a team. I can see Drip being with SSBF or Raivann.MagnaofIllusion wrote:And yet you don’t explain how lynching LMP will provide more information than a DripHydra lynch. Especially since you’ve linked Drip to several players but LMP only to Drip.Unsight wrote:The long answer is that I prefer lynches that provide stronger reflection. Given more than one suspect, I prefer to lynch the one that yields the most information.
You need to realize that my repeatedly mentioning my suspicions of Drip is my way of acting on them. I have a single vote so I pick one of my suspects that yields good information on flip and vote them, but I don't stop talking about the other people I think are scum nor do I stop looking for the rest of the scum. I don't keep mentioning Drip because I'm distancing, I keep mentioning him because I'm suspicious of him and, up until Percy made his case, I was one of the few even talking about him.MagnaofIllusion wrote:Looks more like a distancing tactic. You repeatedly mention your suspicions of Drip but never move at all to act on them. Scummy.
What question did I miss?Thor665 wrote:Perhaps it is - my white noise also included a specific question, do you have a reply to that question or are you planning to ignore it?Benmage wrote:White noise.Thor665 wrote:@Benmage- we understand that Vezo is anti-town and/or VI, I'm actually pretty sure every player here has said as much. Are you going anywhere with this? It feels more like white noise then scumhunting.
Then exactly how does a LMP lynch provide more information than a Drip lynch? You just have stated that you can see Drip as being linked to either SSBF (and by extension MLock) or to Raivann (and by extension Dana and / or LMP). And why if you are linking dana and LMP are you not voting for dana which is a viable lynch at this stage?Unsight wrote:You answer your first sentence with your second sentence. I believe we have two scum teams but I don't believe all my suspects are on the same one. I can see Dana and LMP being on a team with Raivann and I can see SSBF and MacCavityLock being on a team. I can see Drip being with SSBF or Raivann.
WHO DID YOU STAB?Benmage wrote:What question did I miss?
To be more explicit - you noted twice that you thought vezo was dumb about his role PM and all those posts contained was that information. Unless you think nobody in town thinks of Vezo as the VI I really didn't see the purpose nor the scumhunting in your postings. Please explain that purpose.Benmage wrote:What question did I miss?Thor665 wrote:@Benmage- we understand that Vezo is anti-town and/or VI, I'm actually pretty sure every player here has said as much.Are you going anywhere with this?It feels more like white noise then scumhunting.
I don't think thats relevant right now.MagnaofIllusion wrote:WHO DID YOU STAB?Benmage wrote:What question did I miss?
Haven't there been several people talking about his VI-ness..why are you only asking me? But to be more helpful, I thought I said it was just white noise...hence no purpose...for if there was a purpose, than it wouldn't of been white noise.Thor665 wrote:To be more explicit - you noted twice that you thought vezo was dumb about his role PM and all those posts contained was that information. Unless you think nobody in town thinks of Vezo as the VI I really didn't see the purpose nor the scumhunting in your postings. Please explain that purpose.Benmage wrote:What question did I miss?Thor665 wrote:@Benmage- we understand that Vezo is anti-town and/or VI, I'm actually pretty sure every player here has said as much.Are you going anywhere with this?It feels more like white noise then scumhunting.
This post is made of win. I'm starting to think Unsight is trying to distance from Dripp.Unsight wrote:Still waiting. Do you or do you not admit that if you spot a connection between me and Dripp, it could be because I agree with what they are saying and thus think they are town. Why does my having agree with Dripp make me scum? Even if Dripp is scum, is it not possible I have a misread.MagnaofIllusion wrote:**SNIP A WHOLE BUNCH OF STUFF WHERE UNSIGHT STILL DOESN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION**
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Then exactly how does a LMP lynch provide more information than a Drip lynch? You just have stated that you can see Drip as being linked to either SSBF (and by extension MLock) or to Raivann (and by extension Dana and / or LMP). And why if you are linking dana and LMP are you not voting for dana which is a viable lynch at this stage?
I don’t see any rational argument for why you keep dancing away from Drip as the best source of information based on the links you posted above. Are you intimidated by Drip and afraid to challenge them?
Umm, that was CSL, not me.Thor665 wrote:I'm also fascinated that SSBF the claim at L-10 vanilla lurker ended up as a tacked on number 4 to your list, when almost everyone else considers him far more scummy then that.
Would you please explain why you think you're willing to lynch Thor665?Drippereth wrote:For this sentence alone, I'd be willing to lynch Thor. Just sayin'
...No?MacavityLock 1171 wrote:Aren't those two the exact same thing?Percy wrote:Also, ML's attack on LynchMePls feels contrived. I read LMP's comments on the SSBF/dana slots as encouraging attention on the two slots, not dissuading attention from others.
I'm quoting this because I'd really like you to answer the original question. Whilst anti-town and scum are not the same thing, theyThor665 1176 wrote:I am well aware of this, please refer to my post where I bolded and underlined the relevant statements. I agree that anti-town and scummy are two different things and made it clear in my commentary that I understood this and accurately represented what it was you said.Unsight wrote:Anti-town and scummy are not synonymous.Thor665 wrote:Out of curiosity, why the soft sell on him, then?Unsight wrote:If I had a read on vezo one way or the other, I'd have given it.Yougo out of your way to bring him up,describe him as being "very anti-town" while apparently, and then mention that there are lots of people who need to be lynched first without mentioning any of them. If there are people who need rope prior to vezo why mention him by name and not them?notfinding him scummy
LOLLERCOASTERdanakillsu 1191 wrote:I wasn't pushing anyone until you asked me, because I was defending myself.
(1) Why are you choosing this reason, when you've stated others in the past?Drippereth wrote:Oh, yeah, but THIS. This is why I had a scum read on vezo. I can't convince Elli... but I think that's scum knowing the claim is fake.danakillsu wrote:Number 1 scum: vezokpiraka
Votes for Raivann, unvotes him because of his claim, even though he thinks it's fake, then votes for someone else, while saying Raivann's still probscum but he might be wrong. Wow.
Vote: Vezokpiraka
Vote: Vezokpiraka
(Aside: I know it's tempting to pre-empt the "HURRRRPA DURRRR" response from vezok, but I'm a bit at the phrasing of those last two phrases)Axelrod 1224 wrote:Vezo: this is what you said then:
How on earth coud you make this claim if you are the daughter of Howland Reed? Not even you could be that bad.vezopiraka wrote:I want to be raised as the new hand.
I am playing by role can't remember who is that called.
I am the next in line for the throne raise me.
Could you?
Your metaphors are broken. Here's how to fix it: "You must read some fantasy series right now. If you aren't reading either Song of Ice and Fire or Wheel of Time, you must explain why not." In this situation, how is encouraging focus on two not the same as discouraging focus everywhere else?Percy wrote:@MacavityLock:...No?MacavityLock 1171 wrote:Aren't those two the exact same thing?Percy wrote:Also, ML's attack on LynchMePls feels contrived. I read LMP's comments on the SSBF/dana slots as encouraging attention on the two slots, not dissuading attention from others.
"Hey, you should readA Song of Ice and Fire!" ≠ "Hey, you shouldn't ever readThe Twilight Saga!"