This is the other head of Le Cupcake. Apologies for having been busy... We have finally had the chance to analyze.
Anythings, regarding Ythan's case and play:
1.
"Quote comes from game. Therefore, you are scum!"
As had been covered in the past few pages, this has been invalidated.
2.
"Nayru is not an aquatic Goddess. What a shitty fake claim."
LLD has posted plenty of references regarding the fact that Nayru is indeed often associated with water. We do not know the game. We cannot support our claim with in-game references.
BE then says
Blooderection wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If you look at my iso, in the OTHER Zelda wiki, there are LOTS of references to water, zoras and aquatic nature.
That doesn't help if that's not the site that Reck+dram used.
because you know, there is NO WAY the mods used any other site, and you DEFINITELY know which sites they used. Yeah, no.
3.
So, why did we say that Ythan spew BS? Because he assumes that he is right without supporting your arguments against LLD apart from
“I know the game! It cannot possibly be that Nayru is aquatic and thus I will choose to ignore all your references and evidence that associate Nayru with water! Because, guess what, I say it’s impossible! Oh hey, other people like jenniwren and jmj have posted also claiming the link between Nayru and water."
Example:
jmj3000 wrote:Din flat out is fire. There is a reason her spell in the game is called "Din's Fire". So, using that logic and connection, its not such a leap to assume Nayru is aquatic and Farore is verdant. I have also always associated water with protection and Nayru's Love is out and out a protection spell...(irrelevant info omitted)
"That’s okay, I’ll choose to ignore them but telling them to post an analysis, even if it BLATANTLY clear what their point is
(post 1003). And anyways, I’ll ignore their point anyways because they’re WRONG and I’m right. Yep, that’s it. I’ll just keep posting BS.”
4.
The following is about Ythan’s summary on page 41.
(
here,
here and
here)
“Cupcake claims aquatic goddess. It’s incorrect.”
Why does he say this? Because he assumes that he knows everything about the flavor and how the mods worked the flavor from the actual games into this mafia game.
“LLD starts her defense. It’s not a good one. And she OMGUS’ed me.”
In actuality, Ythan fails to really refute any of her arguments beyond “It’s wrong!” For example, her reason for voting him in the first place
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:2.
You are pushing Against Cupcake with false information, hoping that no one will notice!
Much more likely. There is so little evidence against Cupcake, and you are scrounging to get more. This isn't something a townie should be doing.
VOTE: Ythan
He never comments on this, by the way, apart from saying it's proxy-OMGUS.
We activated Nayru’s Love to protect ourselves. This resulted in the cuccos being disintegrated into little blue particles. LLD points out that this is likely the blue force field known as Nayru’s Love because it is logical that when things collide into a force field, they disintegrate. Ythan’s refute?
“You’re lying.”
Ythan wrote:
963 Lady LD claims that Cupcake was defended by a blue forcefield, ie Nayru's Love. Too bad she's completely lying.
Absolutely amazing refute, isn’t it? Ythan assumes he knows everything about this game, when in fact, it is completely false. He is not one of the mods, but yet he feels the need to strut around acting a god.
5.
“LLD is poorly defending Cupcake based on lies!”
This is just BS. Why? Because Ythan has thus far been unable to disprove anything without basing it off of flavor speculation. All he does is make forceful statements that are completely unsupported. And when others post relevant information that go against him, such as the cases with jenniwren and jmj, he ignores them. Ythan’s strategy is this: he makes strong accusations, calling people liars, hoping that the certainty in his words will completely mask his lack of proof, and thus win other people’s support. This tactic is commonly used, not just in mafia. One uses emotive words and assertive claims so that others will be more inclined to listen/believe them without probing any deeper.
6.
LLD points out Ythan’s lack of proof and his constant defenses that consist of
“You’re lying. I’m right.”
What is Ythan’s response?
“Quit whining. I don’t care”
which is a reflection of all his arguments.
Ythan wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Ythan wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:And I'll note that you provide NO PROOF that I am lying. You just come out and say it. You flood the chat with meaningless drabble, just to make it look re-searched, when nothing in your statements is based on FACT.
You keep saying "I LIED". Prove it. Other wise, you are the liar.
I'm
explaining
why you're a liar. You don't need to make three posts in a row to complain about it.
Your explanation shows no "proof".
All you say is "You're lying" or "I'm right, stop complaining".
Prove it, scum. Defend yourself with logic, or be ignored. Honestly.
Keep whining. It really doesn't matter. I don't need to spoonfeed this to you ad nauseum.
The fact is that he has no proof for what he says beyond
“I know the Zelda game and the mods definitely wouldn’t do that. I know exactly what the mods would/have chosen to do in this game.”
_______________________________________________
Ythan wrote:You're just saying you've done things or that I've done things and you don't refer to them specifically because you're as completely full of shit as your case and you're hoping someone will be stupid enough to take your word for it. Please sit in a corner until enough players check in for us to lynch you or your scumbuddy.
PRETTY MUCH SUMS UP WHAT YTHAN HAS BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST 20 PAGES OR SO.
Cupcake Mafia II has been delayed due to multiple instances of multiple computers spontaneously combusting...-_-