This is the most biased crock of whiny AtE bullshit I've ever read in my time on this site. Almost every word is dedicated to trying to make us think you're a crybaby but don't worry, you've already got that on lock.
Le Cupcake wrote:1.
"Quote comes from game. Therefore, you are scum!"
As had been covered in the past few pages, this has been invalidated.
It was perfectly valid at the time and the ensuing argument drove out your scumbuddy.
2.
"Nayru is not an aquatic Goddess. What a shitty fake claim."
LLD has posted plenty of references regarding the fact that Nayru is indeed often associated with water. We do not know the game. We cannot support our claim with in-game references.
You certainly do not know the game and it don't have anything to contribute to the aquatic issue then don't bother to remind us that your scumbuddy has an opinion you can't elaborate on.
BE then says [/b]
Blooderection wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If you look at my iso, in the OTHER Zelda wiki, there are LOTS of references to water, zoras and aquatic nature.
That doesn't help if that's not the site that Reck+dram used.
because you know, there is NO WAY the mods used any other site, and you DEFINITELY know which sites they used. Yeah, no.
Except we have evidence that they used one site and you didn't even make a point here other than "NO WAY DUDE NO WAY."
Probably the worst part of your post.
No I changed my mind after I read further.
3.
So, why did we say that Ythan spew BS? Because he assumes that he is right without supporting your arguments against LLD apart from
“I know the game! It cannot possibly be that Nayru is aquatic and thus I will choose to ignore all your references and evidence that associate Nayru with water! Because, guess what, I say it’s impossible! Oh hey, other people like jenniwren and jmj have posted also claiming the link between Nayru and water."
You're the worst kind of player and you need to cut the AtE if you want anyone to think otherwise, ever. You're probably really bumming your scumbuddies out with your terrible play. Let's take a look; One, you're acting like I have to believe Lady's aquatic case. Which I don't. It's not a compelling argument in any sense of the words. Go cry about it. Two, pick appeal to emotion or appeal to (not even a) majority, don't use both in one post. Just because two of the other 27 players said it doesn't mean it's true.
Example:
jmj3000 wrote:Din flat out is fire. There is a reason her spell in the game is called "Din's Fire". So, using that logic and connection, its not such a leap to assume Nayru is aquatic and Farore is verdant. I have also always associated water with protection and Nayru's Love is out and out a protection spell...(irrelevant info omitted)
"That’s okay, I’ll choose to ignore them but telling them to post an analysis, even if it BLATANTLY clear what their point is
(post 1003). And anyways, I’ll ignore their point anyways because they’re WRONG and I’m right. Yep, that’s it. I’ll just keep posting BS.”
I've explained why verdant doesn't work and that aquatic is the only one of that trinity that was actually posted in the thread. Don't make me make fun of you for failing at reading on a text-based site.
4.
The following is about Ythan’s summary on page 41.
(
here,
here and
here)
“Cupcake claims aquatic goddess. It’s incorrect.”
Why does he say this? Because he assumes that he knows everything about the flavor and how the mods worked the flavor from the actual games into this mafia game.
You already whined once about me not believing her, you can save your breath for other shit now.
“LLD starts her defense. It’s not a good one. And she OMGUS’ed me.”
In actuality, Ythan fails to really refute any of her arguments beyond “It’s wrong!” For example, her reason for voting him in the first place
The vote was actually unsupported against any factual criticism. Lol you're dumb.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:2.
You are pushing Against Cupcake with false information, hoping that no one will notice!
Much more likely. There is so little evidence against Cupcake, and you are scrounging to get more. This isn't something a townie should be doing.
There still isn't a point here. You two have a bad habit of complaining that my case lacks evidence without actually disputing any of it. Don't worry though, I understand. (It's because you're dumb.)
He never comments on this, by the way, apart from saying it's proxy-OMGUS.
There's nothing else to say about the vote because that's pretty plainly what it is. I'm not going to make up alternate theories to humor your bad playstyle and hers.
We activated Nayru’s Love to protect ourselves. This resulted in the cuccos being disintegrated into little blue particles. LLD points out that this is likely the blue force field known as Nayru’s Love because it is logical that when things collide into a force field, they disintegrate.
Which is a ridiculous stretch, by the way, especially considering that Nayru's Love doesn't even do that. Just using "LLD said this" or "LLD agrees" when she is clearly your scumbuddy is, hate to break it to you because I know you don't have actual content, not a good way to support yourself.
Ythan’s refute?[/b]
“You’re lying.”
Hit the nail on the head too.
Ythan wrote:
963 Lady LD claims that Cupcake was defended by a blue forcefield, ie Nayru's Love. Too bad she's completely lying.
Absolutely amazing refute, isn’t it? Ythan assumes he knows everything about this game, when in fact, it is completely false. He is not one of the mods, but yet he feels the need to strut around acting a god.
Cry about it. More, I mean.
5.
“LLD is poorly defending Cupcake based on lies!”
This is just BS. Why? Because Ythan has thus far been unable to disprove anything without basing it off of flavor speculation. All he does is make forceful statements that are completely unsupported. And when others post relevant information that go against him, such as the cases with jenniwren and jmj, he ignores them. Ythan’s strategy is this: he makes strong accusations, calling people liars, hoping that the certainty in his words will completely mask his lack of proof, and thus win other people’s support. This tactic is commonly used, not just in mafia. One uses emotive words and assertive claims so that others will be more inclined to listen/believe them without probing any deeper.
It IS flavor, if you expect me to provide more evidence in a flavor argument then you're (even more) retarded. Asking for more evidence against you when what is already there is plenty for the argument at hand is a scummy bullshit way out of having to address what's already there. And you're all about some scummy bullshit.
6.
LLD points out Ythan’s lack of proof and his constant defenses that consist of
“You’re lying. I’m right.”
What is Ythan’s response?
“Quit whining. I don’t care”
which is a reflection of all his arguments.
Except I argue against the claim, which you made, and if it's false you must be lying. Lol logic sorry.
I skipped the rest because it's more "You need even more proof before you lynch us and I'm going to bitch about you being mean." Yeah go away nobody cares. Talk about content or shut the fuck up so we don't have to wade through your bullshit. If you think you ever actually made a point in there then feel free to repeat it without all the horrible whining and bitching and moaning and I'll take a look.
