Here, whisper into my ear what you're gonna do tonight...
*leans over towards Furc*
shhh, say it quietly...
It's suspicious because he has gotten a legitimate reason to vote for someone, but opted to ignore that in favour of a random vote on you - an RV which he still holds. He said he was waiting to see if more content came from Bowser -- which hasn't happened -- but still hasn't voted for him. I think he is using his "comical" history with you to maintain a random vote and sidestep discussing many of the matters that other players are engaging in. I would be suspicious of Bowser as his partner (vote someone + FoS partner for distancing) but it doesn't necessarily have to be that; he could be using the Bowser FoS (who had a number of votes on him) to mingle with town and give off appearances of looking for a better place for his vote when, in fact, he has no intention of changing it.VasudeVa wrote:@AurorusVox:Why is Andy's Bowser FoS + VasVote suspicious? If Andy flips scum, who do you think is his buddy? Also, what do you think of MoI?
--prev-edit--
ohJoy, LB is scum with Bowser. Yay!
You've defended SeacoreLost Butterfly wrote:This fucking game.
I really don't understand the Baby Spice hate. Looking through her posts they come across as newb town to me. I absolutely understand where she's coming from with the furc hate but since that's not going anywhere w/e. The rest of her posts don't look bad though, I think the reaction to someone claiming being confirmed town isn't scummy either, it happens most games, and it's really not indicative of alignment. Not seeing her as scum at all. Bad wagon.
Can't say the Elli/DGB hydra have done anything for me so far. DGB putting Fate on her scum list is bizarre, and they've seemed to be on the periphery of the game for the most part.
Where's Kunkstar?
third time he's said "SEACORE IS TOWN" not "seacore is probably town"Fate wrote:Seacore is town because his crumb+motives are very clear to me. Can't say more without outing his claim, which I would like to avoid as there are much better targets out there today.
@???: Furc warded his scumbuddy becomes more and more unlikely as I realize warding would only prevent stalks (from cult pov), which as an:
WAIT FOR IT.
UNLIKELY TOWN ACTION N0.
@RC: DID YOU JUST FUCKING NINJA ME BY QUOTING AFUCKING LIST AND APPROVING IT?
AND YOU THINK IM HARD TO READ YOU USELESS SACK?
I knew that, but I appreciate it being expressed in a way that doesn't make Papa Zito want me to Modkill youReaperCharlie wrote:Plum. For the record, I always liked you. (well, a little bit).
Hmmmmm? Quuue? I don't mean you should out any important information, but I have no clue what you're talking about and YEAH.Fate wrote:Seacore is town because his crumb+motives are very clear to me. Can't say more without outing his claim, which I would like to avoid as there are much better targets out there today.
too bad this is WIFOM because there is an insanity which delays a day dumbfuckxvart wrote:But the flaws are flaws in determining if he is Cult; not determining if he is lying investigator going Murderer. The general consensus is that he is fairly cleared of being Cult, so that is almost a moot point. My point in my last post was that the plan was better when it could catch Cult and Murderer (if in the off chance the town's nonCult read of Furcolow is wrong). I still think it's a good plan because he is lying and most likely already has an insanity. Fate does not have an insanity. Commune will show if Fucolow is an Investigator going Murderer.AurorusVox wrote:And I've already pointed out two flaws in xvart's plan, so no, it's not a good idea.
xvart.
*whisper whisper*ReaperCharlie wrote:Aw, man! Seriously furc? What about me, your best buddy?
Here, whisper into my ear what you're gonna do tonight...
*leans over towards Furc*
shhh, say it quietly...<-- This was small text. Small text is not allowed.
Bowser scum = Andyscum. However, if they aren't horribly obvious like Bowser, I'd like to question them for a little while before I get into gripes of what I do think of them. I'm questioning Andy as we speak, will clarify in a few.AV wrote:If you think Bowser is scum, what do you make of Andy's FoS on Bowser whilst he still has an RV on you?
Do tell, madame Plum.Plum wrote:Also two people claimed to have Warded the same person. Guess what this could mean?
Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
No, I can't.VasudeVa wrote:Yo Furc, 28 pages in the game, you have 7 pages in your ISO.
Can you tone it down a bit? You're really bogging it down.
---
Bowser scum = Andyscum. However, if they aren't horribly obvious like Bowser, I'd like to question them for a little while before I get into gripes of what I do think of them. I'm questioning Andy as we speak, will clarify in a few.AV wrote:If you think Bowser is scum, what do you make of Andy's FoS on Bowser whilst he still has an RV on you?
Do tell, madame Plum.Plum wrote:Also two people claimed to have Warded the same person. Guess what this could mean?
(Although, I think I may have guessed it along the way. It has something to do with Baby Spice right~ *cookie if yes*, *no cookie if no*)
I know all this, and yes I am. He looks like newb town to me.Furcolow wrote: You've defended Seacore
Fate has defended Seacore - twice
Now you're defending BabySpice?
Is he? I'm pretty damn sure he's town, yeah. His play here kinda reminds of early PYP 1.I guess you've moved on from Seacore since he's going to be lynched?
Is he still town?
Plum wrote:Also two people claimed to have Warded the same person. Guess what this could mean?
Unfortunately it proves nothing as it only fails if situations goes like:Rules wrote:Your action will fail if someone targets you with Ward, and you will not be notified of the failure.
I see it ( I think).Plum wrote:Itmight, but it's even more likely - again without looking back over certain things - that it's the flip side of what you're thinking. But we are thinking along the same lines, so we're great.
*half a cookie*
OMG FURC IS CULT I KNEW IT ALL ALONG GUIZFurcolow wrote:*whisper whisper*ReaperCharlie wrote:Aw, man! Seriously furc? What about me, your best buddy?
Here, whisper into my ear what you're gonna do tonight...
*leans over towards Furc*
shhh, say it quietly...<-- This was small text. Small text is not allowed.<-- This was small text. Small text is not allowed.
^scummyVasudeVa wrote:Yo Furc, 28 pages in the game, you have 7 pages in your ISO.
Can you tone it down a bit? You're really bogging it down.
It's nothing near confirmatory. But.kunkstar7 wrote:Plum wrote:Also two people claimed to have Warded the same person. Guess what this could mean?Unfortunately it proves nothing as it only fails if situations goes like:Rules wrote:Your action will fail if someone targets you with Ward, and you will not be notified of the failure.
Player A wards Player B.
Player B wards Player C.
Player B Fails ward.
Both are successful if:
Player A and B ward Player C.
You berated me for talking about graverobbing earlier (or was that rewq? I think it was you!), and now you talk about it? I am not really for this hypocrisy, but that is not why I'm quoting this...kunkstar7 wrote: Points conceded.
Does your plan involve Fate using his commune, or just surviving the shot?
@Hito regarding the graverob roleblock, it consists of having a player waste both night actions on robbing seperate graves. This double graverob was a crucial component to shutting down murderers in SA2 (I know, I had to do it a couple times). Graverobbing should be left to players that are considered likely murderer, and having someone with Necrophilia reduces the effectiveness of that roleblock. The only thing crucial this game is to make sure that graves are robbed by two players apiece.