mhm. Claim Asap.
~Tom
Go away. VP can take care of it, because your posts are starting to look like mineCrab Canon wrote:Get lost. You were using effing meta reasoning in the post I wanted know the author of (and you have no idea whether my reason for asking was vague crap or not). I can only assume you don't want me to try and see through you.
In other news, Crab has been and will continue to be up to several weeks very VP. I only post if my hands are uncontrollably shaking from tiredness currently.
Oj
Regardless of whether the process is open unless some close friends just nominated Elli for kicks being on any list for the Scummies implies a level of skill and commitment that I have yet to see from Elli. You may be right about recent trends due to DGB.CrabCanon wrote:Also, being nominated for a scummy =/= most awesome scummer ever. It is an open process afterall. elli is a fine player, but his recent close affiliation with DGB has warped his playstyle into being non-contributive imo. It's more of a null tell than anything if you ask me.
Your opinion is noted. Completely wrong, but noted. Your ‘reasoning’ for who was scummy based on the bv311 wagon was horrible and I pointed it out as such.Faranor wrote:
What I meant to say is that your words aren't matching up to what you're supposed to be thinking. You say that my post makes you question my motives, as if you weren't doing that already. You're saying, "Well this here post could very well be scummy!" which is scummy.
Great that you want a claim. At this late juncture a credible claim out of Pineapple most likely results in a No Lynch. Shouldn’t you want people to vote for Pineapple because, I don’t know, you actually think they are scum?Faranor wrote:In other news, we have less than two days left before our deadline. It would be great if the people voting for IceCream could go back to Pineapple so that we can get a claim today.
Nice of you to show up approximately 15 hours before deadline and say nothing. Classy.Bowser wrote:This is the new un-Untrod Tripod head checking in to replace CSL. Trying to get thread read before deadline, but I wanted to say hi and announce my presence.
Won't comment on anything else yet as i don't want to inadvertantly disagree with my other half.
Uh, thanks for the warm welcome. You're so totally classy. I'm catching up as fast as I can.BlackSpy wrote:Nice of you to show up approximately 15 hours before deadline and say nothing. Classy.
Crab Canon wrote:What info do you see coming out of that? Also, you think a Pineapple flip would be informative, but you're voting IceCream....idk about the people in this game.PP wrote:Also, a Pineapple flip (Pineapple turnover?) would provide more info here.
Well, there's that, plus Bowser's random vote on Pineapple, plus he's the L-1 vote. I think there are some nice ties there to analyze.Crab Canon wrote:I second this. There is way too much stalling of giving reads and reasons for reads in this game. Pretty unacceptable.MS wrote:-His insistence that he needs to see Pineapple's flip before he can make a single case grates at me. Bowser, just save time and answer this. Who do you think is scum if Pineapple flips town? Who do you think is scum if Pineapple flips scum?
Oh, It is perfectly understandable that you got that impression. I don't use arguments like that often, because people don't think they are convincing. The reason why we argued for not revealing is because we agreed on that before the game started. Parama hates meta and I didn't know most of the players here. I did expect there to be nameclaims before a lynch, and somewhere in the game a massnameclaim, but I didn't see the necessity for it to be right on day 1. So I agreed on Parama's stance and that became our official one.Crab Canon wrote:I had the idea you were markedly anti-meta but I can't check where I got the impression from and whether I remember wrong (probably I do) right now.
But this makes for a new questions: if you think meta is "very important" in a certain context, whythe hell was your slot (and both heads) drawing out an argument with mine against revealing heads?
And why did you use crappy meta on me (and VP) saying I'm scum for not responding to the reasonless accusation of us being scum - you would have had the knowledge I can barely play mafia at the moment.
Oj
Do you agree with me that you aren't the person to say nothing?Crab Canon wrote:We kind of feel there is a degree of sincerity to Pineapple's exasperated claim. Sigh. Anyone up for a last minute IceCream lynch?
That vote count is all kinds of effed up, but I think support may be there. If not, we'll be sure to vote pineapple (again).
@Smith - Oj is saying that you should have known CC would have dropped in activity a touch after having only one head to post. Additionally, this meta of me that you are claiming is laughable in my opinion. You make me sound like I rage anytime someone has suspicion of me, which is pretty inaccurate to say the least.
Well, that isn't helping either. Why am I doublevoting? Why are we voting for IceCream, otherhead? And why are the only serious wagons on players I don't really want to lynch?bv310 wrote:D2's Fifth official vote count!
Pineapple (L-1): Faranor, Chimaira, Bowser, TomAndJerry, Crab Canon
IceCream (L-4): Professor Paradox, Mr. Smith
Professor Paradox (L-4): MasterSpy, Pineapple
Bowser (L-5): Mr. Smith
With 10 alive, it will take 6 to lynch, 5 to no-lynch.
Deadline is Thursday, November 18 at 3pm Eastern Standard Time. That's about 7.5 hours from now.
EDIT: Vote count corrected.
Everything is situational. There are no hard and fast rules to follow in this game. I responded to IC's vote because he started the idiot wagon. I ignored your initial vote because I felt you were basically poking me with a stick to see if you could get a scummy rise out of me. I could see the town motivation for doing it, so I didn't much care about it. Now, your continued pursuit of it beyond that seems less town to me and that was when I was directly asking you to clarify what you meant by ignoring and such. Oj pursued the same. I still feel you're being intentionally ambiguous about it. Where exactly does your meta of me come from anyhow, because I don't recall playing many games with you recently?Smith wrote:Do you agree with me that you aren't the person to say nothing?
Because you already said that it is natural for you to react. (I know it depends on the situation) I expected an aknowledgement of the vote from town VP (or town Ojanen). I didn't get it. I wondered what the reason could be, and I think you didn't want the attention on you, which is scummy. As town nothing would have kept you from asking for a reason or two.Crab Canon wrote:I didn't say you poked me without reason. I said you poked me to see if I was scum, which isn't really going to get a rise out of me. I guess I disagree with you because I DO think the town reaction to a silly attack is to not distract the town with petty disagreements. You're also shifting the argument away from the meta argument you proposed initially. Why?
The part about meta-suspecting me due to not responding to the recent no reason vote was outside of the quote from your qt, which means it was madeMr Smith wrote: I'm basically too lazy to find arguments against Faranor and you, so I posted my real reason for suspecting you. The post was posted in our quicktopic last weekend, I think. In any case, before I knew you were busy. And then, that isn't really an excuse, because I posted about both heads of your hydra. And VP is definately here.
Well I'm not going to try to argue with you if you're just making a terrible assumption. I don't mind scrutiny regardless of alignment, but you should at least try to make it somewhat convincing. The premise of your argument is meta against both our heads and I my refutation is that your meta is terrible. What is Parama's reasoning since he hates meta so much?Mr Smith wrote:Because you already said that it is natural for you to react. (I know it depends on the situation) I expected an aknowledgement of the vote from town VP (or town Ojanen). I didn't get it. I wondered what the reason could be, and I think you didn't want the attention on you, which is scummy. As town nothing would have kept you from asking for a reason or two.Crab Canon wrote:I didn't say you poked me without reason. I said you poked me to see if I was scum, which isn't really going to get a rise out of me. I guess I disagree with you because I DO think the town reaction to a silly attack is to not distract the town with petty disagreements. You're also shifting the argument away from the meta argument you proposed initially. Why?