Mina wrote:(I'm happy with how my Lrdwhyt and Elmo votes turned out)
Back to lurking!
Mina, I wasMina wrote:Why don't you and I Am Innocent both try a thought experiment? Maybe close your eyes, pretend for a minute you've just received a PM from Zachrulez saying that Percy is an innocent child. Now reread Percy's ISO, knowing that he's confirmed town. See if you still suspect him, or if evidence for his innocence pops up. Even if you don't change your opinion, at least you'll know you're being objective.
I understand why my tunneling can be frustrating, so if you need to mean to me, I can take it...Mina wrote:I Am Innocent, it is taking me a lot of willpower not to be very mean right now. You are very lucky that I'm not Benmage.
Why you are voting for Baby Spice and not Lrdwhyt? Is it just because Benmage is voting for Baby Spice?
The question is not silly. I'm asking how many times would you, would anyone, follow someone's lead suspect if they continuously flip town without begging the question of the person you're following alignment. Why can't you just give a number? Is it 1, 2, 3? I know If I was following someone I had real strong town read on, but lead town down 2 wrong lynches I'd be taking a strong reread of the person.Thor665 wrote:It's not deflection, it's pointing out how silly the question is to begin with.
How many mislynches will I "allow"? First off, I'm not sure that I'm the sole force that dictates who is lynched and whether that lynch is a mislynch or a scum lynch.
Second, the basis of your argument for how we're mislynching is based on a belief that Percy is scum and that BS is town all while you vote BS which is just three kinds of silly.
Therefore, at the very least, if this is a mislynch and it's bad that I'm allowing it then it must be equally culpable on your part for supporting/allowing it as well. I was curious to see how you'd respond to the question which is why I basically turned it around and fed it back at you, and your basic answer was 'deflection' and 'as many as it takes' so how about we consider those my answers as well.
Last man standing?Benmage Post 810 wrote:Damnit Sotty…that’s what I get for posting from my phone. Why have we never played together?Sotty7 wrote:False. Hi.Benmage Post 786 wrote:Percy and I are the two most experienced people here, true or false?
Also, hammer time.
Okay, fair enough if you're “not feeling” Baby as scum but reading this little block of text I see no reason for you to be fighting the Baby wagon like you are. You are actively derailing a wagon on a player who you admittedly have at least a slight scum read on. Why exactly?Mina Post 813 wrote:@Sotty: My reason was that Baby Spice put the third vote on LrdWhyt IsupposeI could concoct a conspiracy theory in which she was bussing LrdWhyt and preemptively setting one of us up as his buddy, but it just looked really weird and convoluted for a scum gambit. I wouldn't die of shock if she flipped guilty, and I kind of see Locke's point that setting contingencies based on the lynch is scummy (it's so much fun as scum to link your partner to every group suspect in existence). But meh. I guess I'm not really feeling it. She doesn't seem to be opportunistically tailoring her opinions to suit the masses.
1] Me too. But experience has taught me that sometimes you just have to take a deep breath and jump over that cliff already. Considering the set up of this game with the double lynch, I think the town can afford to play a little lose here.Mina Post 813 wrote:Why am I panicking?
1) Force of habit. I always second-guess myself at crunch time.
2) People should not be using lack of time and desire to get making compromise votes on Baby Spice instead of pushing a player they suspect more when we have time to reach a consensus. I mean...seriously, you have no problem whatsoever with Benmage's, IAI, and Furcolow's votes?
3) Furc's recent posts have looked so opportunistic and conscious of popular opinion that I'd rather that Furcolow and Lrdwhyt were the lynches. So I'd prefer we lynch LW right now, and then we move onto the next phase, in which I push Furc over Baby Spice.
First off I never classed anything Babyspice did asMina Post 813 wrote:Sotty, question. Why do you find Baby Spice's cognitive dissonance scummy and not Furcolow's? Also, do you think that Furcolow's play is similar to his town or scum meta?
Now this I can give you. In my opinion, it is your only legit point you have for stalling the Babyspice lynch.Mina Post 813 wrote:4) I'd rather everyone took a stand before the lynch.
I have already said why.Mina Post 813 wrote:Your turn. What's the rush for someone to hammer right away, Sotty? Why don't you want more discussion?
I pretty much agree with this.Thor665 Post 814 wrote:I'll preface this by saying that a lot of Mina's last post to Benmage resonated with me.Benmage wrote:^^^^^Wow scummiest post of this century. This is Lynch 1. Even if it goes through quickly, why/how would it affect your read on Lrd?? You’ve been pushing BS for 2 days. You should be jumping up and down and ecstatic about your 2 day lead suspect being lynched for whatever reason that have convinced others.
That said...I actually think Benmage has a decent point here. Earlier in the same post Percy was talking about how long and solid he has been on BS and now that the wagon is finally getting some good steam under it he wants to unvote to re-read LrdWhyt? Something is a little odd with this.
Do you find me scummy for unvoting Lrd when he was at lynch-1?jasonT1981 Post 828 wrote:slowly getting back on my feet.. got diagnosed with food poisioning and a burst blood vessel. Not as serious as I thought but still groggy on it...
Seriously shocked at Percys attempts at derealing the BS wagon at -1... I know he says its a 24hour thing but it seems more like scum getting cold feet on lynching his partner. I don't buy his reasons for it one bit. If anything it indicates more Percy is likely to be scum with a BS lynch. I would go as far as saying on the seere likelyhood BS flips scum Percy is an automatic policy lynch. We need to lynch him by the end of this day phase.
Reread Post 776. Never had a town read on Baby Spice.Sotty7 wrote:Benmage and IAI's votes do look suspect on face value. Both are voting for someone they believe is town out of spite. However, I still have a strong town read on IAI because I have seen scumIAI and this is totally different. He does earn a couple of scum points for the reasoning to his vote but not enough for me to abandon this read.
I'm not sure why that is. I think he's definitely scummy and you're sorta free-floating on my list, right now. I haven't found anything that looks associative between you, but I can't think of a good reason this isn't plausible. Why are you unimpressed?Sotty7 wrote:Also extremely unimpressed that you are also pairing me with Lrd like your BFF Baby. But at least your voting the right way round unlike Babyspice.
That is not the defence of Jason that I quoted, though. You said:Sotty7 wrote:No, I'm voting Babyspice for pushing scummy logic. Jason's slip wasn't a slip and thereforewasn'tscummy.
and I do think that is a very plausible explanation for at least parts of her play, in particular her stance on Benmage. I am not calling you out on a double standard, but I do think it's odd that you don't appear to have even considered this; in particularSotty7 wrote:He has a tendency to get into trouble like this because he tends to play on emotions and will just knee jerk to everything. As scum he is much more composed.
that, and as far as I can see, don't seem to find it an important thing to think about.Sotty7 wrote:I see no reason to attribute Babyspice's actions as VI over scummy. But as I think your question over, I guess I have no hardened reasoning why. I find her moves scummy and not stupid.
Would you like to see a Lrd lynch in the second part of today?Sotty7 wrote:Lrd's vote on Elmo is awful it does not count as scum hunting. Benmage's push on him is good in that respect.
how about you fix yourself? aBenmage wrote:Furc, remember when you said you were new. Well I am experienced and kscopes play has not been telling of his alignment.
That's why he's not the first lynch for today. I'm not saying he's confirmed town or for you to ignore him. I am only saying he's not lynch one.
So ya, fix yoself.
I appreciate the clarity. The way you areI Am Innocent Post 836 wrote:Reread Post 776. Never had a town read on Baby Spice.Sotty7 wrote:Benmage and IAI's votes do look suspect on face value. Both are voting for someone they believe is town out of spite. However, I still have a strong town read on IAI because I have seen scumIAI and this is totally different. He does earn a couple of scum points for the reasoning to his vote but not enough for me to abandon this read.
My vote for her is because I do not see a lynch on my Top 2 (Percy/Thor), and I see BS as equally likely to be scum as Lrdwhyt, Mina, Furc. So instead of picking a name out of a hat from these 4 players, I threw caution to the wind and picked BS because if she flips town, more fire will be added to the fires of My Top 2, which is very good if I am right about them.
Because it came right off the back of Baby calling that exact same scum team.Elmo Post 843 wrote:KScope's iso is always terrible, unfortunately.
I'm not sure why that is. I think he's definitely scummy and you're sorta free-floating on my list, right now. I haven't found anything that looks associative between you, but I can't think of a good reason this isn't plausible. Why are you unimpressed?Sotty7 wrote:Also extremely unimpressed that you are also pairing me with Lrd like your BFF Baby. But at least your voting the right way round unlike Babyspice.
I still don't think I am getting your point Elmo.Elmo Post 843 wrote:That is not the defence of Jason that I quoted, though. You said:Sotty7 wrote:No, I'm voting Babyspice for pushing scummy logic. Jason's slip wasn't a slip and thereforewasn'tscummy.and I do think that is a very plausible explanation for at least parts of her play, in particular her stance on Benmage. I am not calling you out on a double standard, but I do think it's odd that you don't appear to have even considered this; in particularSotty7 wrote:He has a tendency to get into trouble like this because he tends to play on emotions and will just knee jerk to everything. As scum he is much more composed.that, and as far as I can see, don't seem to find it an important thing to think about.Sotty7 wrote:I see no reason to attribute Babyspice's actions as VI over scummy. But as I think your question over, I guess I have no hardened reasoning why. I find her moves scummy and not stupid.
I really do think that it's odd that you don't have this train of thought if you're town. Why do you think it's scummy and not stupid?
Yes. He is my second suspect. I really want to see both Baby and Lrd lynched today, I think that's the scum team. Especially with how Baby was so desperate to link me to Lrd for extremely poor reasons.Elmo Post 843 wrote:Would you like to see a Lrd lynch in the second part of today?Sotty7 wrote:Lrd's vote on Elmo is awful it does not count as scum hunting. Benmage's push on him is good in that respect.
Haven't I done that whole game?Furcolow wrote:are you willing to put your neck on the line for a percy lynch?KaleiÐoscøpe wrote:yeah, but unless you have statistics, lurking is not a scumtell.
Still want to see Percy lynched here.
Lurking is a scumtell.KaleiÐoscøpe wrote:yeah, but unless you have statistics, lurking is not a scumtell.
How does this make any sense?Furcolow wrote: d2 is perfect to lynch him,and there is even a lynch between me and you to see how this guy flips
if he flips red, you're lynched next
if he flips green, policy lynch me and let percy fry when i flip green
problem fucking solved