Mortal Kombat Mafia (Game Over: Mafia Win)

[Kise]

OH so BL claimed miller. I finally decided to read the last few pages instead of bullshitting. Nice one. And actually, I think BL is town because my character was kicking the heroes' asses in MK 2011 but I'm with the town here. The storyline is probably from Armageddon then and not the 2011 game.

[DemonHybrid]

VOTE COUNT FOR KOMBATANTS

Day 1 Vote Count (#3)

CooLDoG (10) - Darox, Albert B. Rampage, Fate, Toogeloo, xRECKONERx, Ghostwriter, Oversoul, Palisade, Internet Stranger, T-Bone
Fate (2) - CooLDoG, Nero Cain
Palisade (2) - Magister Ludi, Amrun

Not voting (13) - Snakeplissken, zMuffinMan, WeyounsLastClone, Timeater, springlullaby, Bunnylover, The Fonz, Mastermind of Sin, kiwieagle, Bogre, Kise

The deadline for Day 1 is August 25th, 8:00 PM EDT. With 25 alive, it takes 13 to select a Kombatant.

The stage for Day 1 is: The Pit!

[Bunnylover]

Lol, Bone that's totally Tekken dude.

Ermac is bad at first but then goes good. In the reinvented Mortal Kombat game (2011) Ermac is again bad, but it's because

Ermac is a bunch of spirits tied together that are controlled by Shao Khan.

So it really could go either way depending on which storyline the mod is using.

This is in my pm. As for why I am good, it just says because a man set me free and I see the light now lol.

[Darox]

BL, Kise, why are you not voting for Cooldog?

Do it, do it now.

[Amrun]

Unvote; Vote: CooLDog

[springlullaby]

Hello guys, I'm a miller. Thought I'd let you know.

[springlullaby]

haha 'k'ombatant
too cool <3 <3 <3

[Palisade]

I'm preoccupied elsewhere at the moment. But we have a CC. It's pretty clear one of the miller claims needs to be lynched. UNVOTE: Cooldog, VOTE: singersigner.

[Palisade]

...And you can tell exactly how distracted I am by the fact that I said singersigner rather than VOTE: springlullaby.

[springlullaby]

Actually, that's fine by me.

VOTE Springlullaby

[springlullaby]

Ahem. I fucked that up, haven't read my PM through.

Lemme think about this first.

UNVOTE

[Darox]

I'm preoccupied elsewhere at the moment. But we have a CC. It's pretty clear one of the miller claims needs to be lynched. UNVOTE: Cooldog, VOTE: singersigner.

FUCK.



YOU.

[Amrun]

What the sam hell is happening here?

[Toogeloo]

Ahem. I fucked that up, haven't read my PM through.

Lemme think about this first.

UNVOTE

ITT:
Scum didn't read the first couple pages and see a Miller claim already and thought they could get away with one themselves.

unvote;
vote: springlullaby

[Toogeloo]

By the way, how have you not read your PM? You had to confirm through it before we started playing the game. I imagine you had to have at least read through to that part, right?

[springlullaby]

Alright
1. I think there is a chance Bunnylover and I are both town. I had forgotten this was a large theme.
2. But checking up on Ermac, I don't see why that would be a miller role.

@Bunnylover: I'd like more flavor on you please. Specifically I'm going to leave out one major element of my role, please fill.

a. I'm Kabal.
b. I was formerly associated with the Black Dragon syndicate but decided to redeem myself and fight crime. Even being cruelly mangled could only further my hate of crime and evil. Unfortunately, my past and my ugliness make people not willing to trust me.
c. My being a miller is considered a XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (Please fill in the xxxx)


--------------------------

@Palissade, why would you want two miller to pit against each other? Eager to deflect heat from yourself?

[Amrun]

Fffffffff

No way are both millers town. NO WAY.

VOTE: springlullaby

[springlullaby]

By the way, how have you not read your PM? You had to confirm through it before we started playing the game.

I imagine you had to have at least read through to that part, right?

Do you really think that is a good argument?

1. I only skim read through my PM when I received it, and replied back.
2. My PM is complicated.
3. What 'part' are you referring to? The sentence in bold make no sense.

[springlullaby]

Fffffffff

No way are both millers town. NO WAY.

VOTE: springlullaby

Why? WHY

[Toogeloo]

Alright
1. I think there is a chance Bunnylover and I are both town. I had forgotten this was a large theme.
2. But checking up on Ermac, I don't see why that would be a miller role.

Statement 1 says you think you both are Millers (if you think BL is town, then you think he is Miller).
Statement 2 tries to discredit BL's claim to being a Miller.

[springlullaby]

Alright
1. I think there is a chance Bunnylover and I are both town. I had forgotten this was a large theme.
2. But checking up on Ermac, I don't see why that would be a miller role.

Statement 1 says you think you both are Millers (if you think BL is town, then you think he is Miller).
Statement 2 tries to discredit BL's claim to being a Miller.

No.
1. Statement one is me considering that Bunny lover may be truthful.
2. Statement two is me considering that Bynny lover may be lying.
And the rest of my post is me trying to check up with Bunnylover to see if we should trust each other.

[springlullaby]

Alright
1. I think there is a chance Bunnylover and I are both town. I had forgotten this was a large theme.
2. But checking up on Ermac, I don't see why that would be a miller role.

Statement 1 says you think you both are Millers (if you think BL is town, then you think he is Miller).
Statement 2 tries to discredit BL's claim to being a Miller.

Do you acknowledge selective quoting?

[springlullaby]

By the way, how have you not read your PM? You had to confirm through it before we started playing the game.

I imagine you had to have at least read through to that part, right?

Do you really think that is a good argument?

1. I only skim read through my PM when I received it, and replied back.
2. My PM is complicated.
3. What 'part' are you referring to? The sentence in bold make no sense.

Toogeloo, please answer question 3.

[Toogeloo]

The part of your PM that indicated your way of confirmation, ie. what the first two parts of the statement are referring to.

Also, I will not acknowledge selective quoting. Your post has a clear disconnect in delivery that appears as though you are trying assuage the suspicion on you and then immediately leap to a claim. Me pointing out what appears to be a logic fallacy didn't have anything to do with your claim, so I didn't feel it needed to be posted with the quote.

[Darox]

Bloody hell you people are worse than crack weasels.

Miller claims are stupid we get it. That doesn't mean we shouldn't kill Palisade asap.