↑ DeltaWave wrote:Yeah, change what I'm saying, add some assumptions, create some implications I never intended, and you come to the conclusion that it's anti-town.
Anyway, you've shown yourself to be crappy at paraphrasing. You add implications and assumptions that were never in the original statement. I can't trust you to accurately describe what anyone else is doing, so show me the originals if you want me to respond to something particular.
It isn't anti town then? I don't care whether or not you intended the implication, that doesn't mean you didn't imply something does it? You need to be more careful with what you're saying because it will incriminate you. What assumptions did I add? If you mean I assumed that you implyed what I thought you implyed, does that mean no one should ever infer something ever again, since it's an assumption, and it might not be what the author had intended when he hastily wrote it? That's ridiculous.
1. In
post 101 he attacks malpascp for a random vote on bv, and then claims to have a town read on bv in the same post (without giving any reasons).
2. In
post 104 he votes for pink, without reason again.
3. In
post 136 he votes for neil, without reason again, and seemingly with no thought for his vote on pink. On both of these occasions he says 'discuss' or 'I want comments' as if that's a justification for voting without reason. He also questions shinki in
post 113 for the same thing that he himself is guilty of.
4. Since voting for Neil, he's hardly contributed anything of merit, and he didn't before voting for Neil anyway. The only resembelance of a case is his
post 138 where he regurgitates the argument about Neil hammering; stating one thing that another player did that is scummy isn't enough to not contribute any more, and it isn't very town like.
All I wanted was your thoughts on this, since you said you had a null tell on all of this. Your response was that Fakinha's actions are the result of someone who doesn't have much information, but that just doesn't work does it? Look at his posts and tell me that he isn't being lazy and unhelpful. Incidentally I didn't ask you about his buddying (I presume you mean to you, despite the fact that you joined him on the Neil bandwagon) but it's interesting you mention it.
Fakinha, here is a definition for
bussing.
Neil it's hypocritical to attack Fakinha and DeltaWave for buddying when it's a null tell when it happens to you. The argument that it only contributes to a case if you think the person has a 'scum mindset' is far too convinient.
Isa, your post is complete rubbish. I wasn't willing to lynch Neil yesterday, and I don't know where you got that idea from. Lastly, you encourage others to start a wagon now so there is enough time to see it through, as if your willing to accept any wagon as long as it results in a lynch.
↑ neil1113 wrote:Again, if you discredit a case for whatever reason, you're not playing to your win condition. Null-tells do not always equal scum people.
I don't get this at all. How does discrediting a case act against your win condition? What if you discredit the case of someone who is the opposing faction, surely that works in your favour?
