I will agree on the town VI hypothesis for now. Another detail in her posts shows that she tends to be clueless about the fishy potential of her proposal.
Moreover, I have never seen scum fish so blatantly.
lewarcher 44 wrote:Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.
It sounds like you already had your mind made up.lewarcher 50 wrote:I will agree on the town VI hypothesis for now. Another detail in her posts shows that she tends to be clueless about the fishy potential of her proposal.
Moreover, I have never seen scum fish so blatantly.
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:C.E.S. Can you actually show us please? I am not really getting anything scummy on Quil. In fact, I would be more likely to examine the wagon on him for potential scum.
↑ lewarcher82 wrote:
This is a terrible idea. This equates you claiming a fluffy and adorable puppy. How is it possible that you do not realise this? And besides, this is fishing. Say that someone tells you that his dog is a German Shepherd who can find anything when he follows his nose. You will just assume that this person is likely a cop. Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.
This seems a little forced, with the preempt asking if we could vote Roxi and then doing so after it was suggested to try it under the pretense of being "curious".
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Ahhh, I am torn so much on Quilford when I play him, I can not stand him and his play style 99% of the time legit. But he does this a lot regardless of alignment, maybe slightly more so as town. In saying that I will push him to actually explain his reads as he always skates by doing this.
Something about these two posts reads scummy to me, but I can't quite put my finger on it. With the Quilford wagon sitting a L-4 at the time of this post and seemingly gathering speed it looks to me like a soft, ambiguous way to get on the wagon if it keeps getting more steam while also softly defending Quilford.↑ jasonT1981 wrote:C.E.S. Can you actually show us please? I am not really getting anything scummy on Quil. In fact, I would be more likely to examine the wagon on him for potential scum.
↑ Vi wrote:Vote: lewarcher82(L-8)
lewarcher 44 wrote:Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.It sounds like you already had your mind made up.lewarcher 50 wrote:I will agree on the town VI hypothesis for now. Another detail in her posts shows that she tends to be clueless about the fishy potential of her proposal.
Moreover, I have never seen scum fish so blatantly.
↑ Vi wrote:Vote: lewarcher82(L-8)
lewarcher 44 wrote:Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.It sounds like you already had your mind made up.lewarcher 50 wrote:I will agree on the town VI hypothesis for now. Another detail in her posts shows that she tends to be clueless about the fishy potential of her proposal.
Moreover, I have never seen scum fish so blatantly.
↑ Ghostlin wrote:↑ lewarcher82 wrote:
This is a terrible idea. This equates you claiming a fluffy and adorable puppy. How is it possible that you do not realise this? And besides, this is fishing. Say that someone tells you that his dog is a German Shepherd who can find anything when he follows his nose. You will just assume that this person is likely a cop. Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.
Yes, but in a petsPick, I'm pretty sure a good majority of us have two of the most common pets out there which are dogs and cats for our animals. Everyone thinks their pet is adorable, I'm sure no one submitted a pet they just hated in a 'pet you love' mafia game. And I'm not sure 'young and spry' relates to a specific mafia role, do you?
The thing that worries me is not that glowball naively chose to reveal her animal's flavor so to speak, but the fact that this is a huge overreach over information that really equates to nothing specific about the role.
Vote: lewatcherL-7
You'll excuse me if I don't buy that. You said you've never seen scum fish so blatantly, but you just said that only moronic scum does it - so have you or haven't you seen it done?↑ lewarcher82 wrote:I sure did. Feel free to meta me and see what I think of fishing as a scumtell. It is anti-town, but only moronic scum does it. But this does not prevent me from discussing the point with the player in the first place.↑ Vi wrote:Vote: lewarcher82(L-8)
lewarcher 44 wrote:Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.It sounds like you already had your mind made up.lewarcher 50 wrote:I will agree on the town VI hypothesis for now. Another detail in her posts shows that she tends to be clueless about the fishy potential of her proposal.
Moreover, I have never seen scum fish so blatantly.
I call rolefishing for lewarcher's pet.Quilford 73 wrote:lewarcher, can you link me to games where you've gotten memorably angry with other players? Do you often get angry with other players in game?