Sorry if this looks a bit cluttered!
↑ Pine wrote: ↑ Maxous wrote:Maybe Rack, I want him to explain that Nero stance and comment.
Pine's defence of scooby is just weird. And unneccessary.
Why would you say it is 'unreasonable' to hold something against scooby when you agree that he is deserving of pressure for the same comment. Why even bother defending him at all if you think he deserves pressure?
And I want to know where the Mastin town read came from.
Having people screaming for a person's death when they haven't actually entered the game yet is a big pet peeve of mine. It pisses me off. If they've engaged with the game, and are withholding significant content (like Rack) then I condone it. All Scooby had done to that point was confirm, and people were ready to lynch him. What the fuck?
Mastin Townread is from experience and gut.
I'll be frank, i'm sceptical of all this.
I still find it hard to beleive you would of used the wording "unreasonable to hold against" if you did beleive he deserved pressure.
I think you were trying to white knight scooby but then realised how silly
this argument was when KK called you on it. And then you tried to cover it with 'well yeah, I agree he deserves pressure'.
And why do you have no read on Scooby if you beleive he deserves pressure?
People who deserve pressure are light scum reads yeah? Are at least people who are acting scummy.
firestarter wrote: Most of what KK has written so far I agree with, except maybe the stance on scooby.
I agree with Pine here, that death shouldn't be in the pipeline for someone who only posted
once, and that was to confirm.
I came in and did the same thing, confirmed. Where was the pressure on me?
You confirmed post #26. Scooby was post #93.
There is a very obvious difference.
And no, mini librarion was not pulling double standards as you seem to be suggesting.
Why does psyche's vote on rack look like a bus to you?
↑ mastin2 wrote:Ohgod. Oh, god. Firestarter. really. is. scum. That post. just.
so. IioA, bad reads, scummy tone...
I need to go back to my QT to type out the details in more...coherence.
I was actually interested in this...
@Jason: Is the tl;dr of your case on psyche 'he avoided a couple of questions before he eventually answered them'.
Frankly,
#308 is very unclear to me.
Are you calling ninja scummy or what? Are you calling benmage scum?
Which of Mastin's thoughts interested you?
Nothing drmyshottyizsik posts makes sense to me.
@Psyche: I don't know what "his posts are meh" means.
↑ redFF wrote:YO MAXOUS COMMENT ON CCV
You over-reacted.
I'm willing to give rack a bit more time to explain themselves but..stop dragging it out already.